ABSTRACT
Iodipamide and iodoxamate were compared at equimolar clinical dosages in dogs with normal, incompletely obstructed and completely obstructed common bile ducts. Forty-eight experiments were performed under general anesthesia in six cholecystomized chronic bile fistula dogs. The peak biliary iodoxamate excretion rate, but not the peak bile iodoxamate concentration, was significantly higher with normal and incompletely obstructed common bile ducts. In complete obstruction, both a significantly higher total biliary iodoxamate excretion and concentration were obtained, but this was still insufficient for radiographic opacification by conventional technique. Lesser toxicity of iodoxamate is suggested by its significantly lower serum levels, its higher bile: urine excretion ratio and its faster compensatory urinary excretion in complete common bile duct obstruction. Iodoxamate appears on this evidence to be a better cholangiographic contrast agent than iodipamide.
