Evaluation of osmolality and pH of various concentrations of methotrexate, cytarabine, and thiotepa prepared in normal saline, sterile water for injection, and lactated Ringer's solution for intrathecal administration.

BACKGROUND: Neurotoxicity of intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy has been variously attributed to the preservatives, volume, osmolality, and pH of the preparations. There has been little evaluation of how different drug concentrations or diluents can affect the osmolality and pH of the final solution. We conducted a three-part study: survey of cancer centers regarding the drug concentrations and diluent used in preparing IT chemotherapy; review of the literature on common practice of preparing IT chemotherapy; evaluation of the pH and osmolality of commonly used chemotherapy preparations for IT. METHOD: We surveyed selected cancer centers to provide information on their standard volume, drug concentrations, and choice of diluents. MEDLINE was searched for clinical reports using the MeSH terms of 'cytarabine,' 'methotrexate,' or 'thiotepa' with the subheading 'Cerebrospinal fluid' and combined with 'intrathecal' in all database fields. Data retrieved included the choice of diluent, volume, and/or drug concentration. We evaluated the pH and osmolality of methotrexate (1, 2, 5, and 10 mg/mL), cytarabine (2, 5, 10, and 25 mg/mL), and thiotepa (1, 2, and 5 mg/mL) in normal saline, sterile water for injection (SWFI), and lactated Ringer's solution. RESULTS: Nine centers were surveyed (seven in Canada, one in Australia, one in United Kingdom). Most centers used 5 mL of preservative-free normal saline, irrespective of the drug or drug concentration used. Forty-four reports in the literature were reviewed. Most reported 5 mL of preservative-free normal saline. Most information on drug concentrations was provided for methotrexate, with an average concentration of about 1-2.5 mg/ mL. Cytarabine 0.4-20 mg/mL and thiotepa 1 mg/mL were also reported. In our in vitro evaluation, there was a trend of increased pH associated with increasing concentration of methotrexate and cytarabine. There was no apparent impact of thiotepa concentration on the pH values of the final preparations, irrespective of the diluent used. Except for cytarabine 10 and 25 mg/mL, all the tested solutions have pH within 10% of the physiologic range of CSF. There was a concentration-dependent change in osmolality with methotrexate and cytarabine preparations. Osmolality was increased with increased concentrations in all except methotrexate mixed in SWFI and thiotepa mixed in normal saline and lactated Ringer's solution. Except for some thiotepa solutions, all the tested solutions have osmolality within 10% of the physiologic range of CSF. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited published literature on the potential impact of diluent and drug concentration on the pH and osmolality of IT chemotherapy preparation. Most cancer centers conventionally prepare IT chemotherapy with 5 mL of preservative diluent normal saline, irrespective of the specific drug or dose used. The conventional practice means that most methotrexate preparations are likely to have comparable pH and osmolality to CSF. In contrast, cytarabine preparations may show significantly higher pH than the CSF, while thiotepa preparations generally have lower osmolality than the CSF.

Trastuzumab and liposomal Doxorubicin in the treatment of mcf-7 xenograft tumor-bearing mice: combination does not affect drug serum levels.

PURPOSE: We assessed the combination of doxorubicin or liposomal doxorubicin with trastuzumab for alterations in peak serum drug levels, as these agents are increasingly being paired in the treatment of aggressive breast cancer. We hypothesized that trastuzumab would exhibit a slower rate of elimination from the serum when in combination with liposomal doxorubicin based on the known effects of liposomal doxorubicin on phagocytic cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), which are responsible in part for the uptake and degradation of antibodies. METHODS: Doxorubicin and trastuzumab serum levels were assessed following injection of free doxorubicin, liposomal doxorubicin, or trastuzumab into female RAG2-M mice bearing subcutaneous MCF-7(HER-2) tumors. The effects of combination drug treatment on tumor growth were compared to single-agent treatment. RESULTS: Peak serum trastuzumab levels were not altered as a result of addition of doxorubicin therapy, nor were doxorubicin levels altered over 24 h as a result of coadministration of trastuzumab. Liposomal doxorubicin administration did result in serum doxorubicin levels 200- to 1000-fold higher than with injection of free doxorubicin. CONCLUSIONS: For the specific combination of trastuzumab with doxorubicin, either in free or liposomal form, coadministered in mice, there was no impact of one drug on the other in terms of peak serum drug levels or efficacy.

Treatment of HER-2/neu overexpressing breast cancer xenograft models with trastuzumab (Herceptin) and gefitinib (ZD1839): drug combination effects on tumor growth, HER-2/neu and epidermal growth factor receptor expression, and viable hypoxic cell fraction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to assess the effects of single agent and combination treatment with trastuzumab and gefitinib on tumor growth and tumor microenvironment in two HER-2/neu overexpressing breast xenograft models, MDA-MB-435/LCC6(HER-2) (LCC6(HER-2); estrogen receptor negative) and MCF-7(HER-2) (estrogen receptor positive). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: LCC6(HER-2) and MCF-7(HER-2) cells, both in tissue culture and xenografts grown in SCID-Rag 2M mice, were treated with trastuzumab and gefitinib, alone or in combination. The rate of tumor growth was determined. In addition, tumor HER-2/neu and epidermal growth factor receptor expression, cell viability, cell cycle distribution, and proportion of viable hypoxic cells were determined by flow cytometric analyses of single tumor cell suspensions. RESULTS: Both tumor models were very sensitive to trastuzumab and moderately sensitive to gefitinib in vivo. The combination resulted in therapeutic effects, as judged by inhibition of tumor growth, which was greater (albeit not statistically significant) than that observed with trastuzumab administered as a single agent. Trastuzumab was effective in down-regulating HER-2/neu, and gefitinib mediated a reduction in epidermal growth factor receptor expression on tumor cells. In LCC6(HER-2) tumors, trastuzumab significantly reduced tumor cell viability, which was not improved by the addition of gefitinib. Gefitinib dramatically reduced the proportion of viable hypoxic cells in LCC6(HER-2) and MCF-7(HER-2) tumors. This effect was abrogated by the addition of trastuzumab. CONCLUSIONS: Although in vivo efficacy studies in two HER-2/neu overexpressing breast xenograft models showed that the combination of trastuzumab and gefitinib was effective, analyses of various cellular parameters failed to reveal beneficial effects and argue that this drug combination may not be favorable.

Drug interaction studies between paclitaxel (Taxol) and OC144-093--a new modulator of MDR in cancer chemotherapy.

The MDR modulator, OC144-093, is a potential candidate for use in cancer therapy and exhibits potent biological activity in vitro and in vivo when combined with anticancer agents such as paclitaxel. Its inhibitory interaction with P-glycoprotein (Pgp), the mdr1 gene product and a mechanistic participant in multidrug resistance, underlies its activity as a modulator of MDR. Having previously shown that OC144-093 is not a substrate for CYP3A we first examined the effects of OC144-093 on paclitaxel metabolism in vitro. Using human liver microsomes, we have demonstrated that OC144-093 inhibited the CYP3A mediated metabolism of paclitaxel at high concentrations only (Ki = 39.8 +/- 5.1 microM, n=3). Pharmacokinetic results also show that an oral dose of OC144-093, co-administered with paclitaxel caused negligible disturbance of the pharmacokinetic profile for paclitaxel when injected intravenously. In contrast, AUC values were elevated approximately 1.5-fold in all groups treated orally with paclitaxel and OC144-093. Cmax was enhanced approximately 2-fold in the co-dosed group. These characteristics are consistent with Pgp blockade in the gut enhancing oral bioavailability. Elimination properties of paclitaxel were affected only upon multiple dosing of OC 144-093. These results warrant the further clinical assessment of OC144-093 as an MDR reversing agent.