Defining practices suitable for care via teleconsultation in gynaecological and obstetrical care: a French Delphi survey.

OBJECTIVE: Delineate the scope of teleconsultation services that can be effectively performed to provide women with comprehensive gynaecological and obstetrical care. DESIGN: Based on the literature and experts' insights, we identified a list of gynaecological and obstetrical care practices suitable for teleconsultation. A three-round Delphi consensus survey was then conducted online among a panel of French experts. Experts using a 9-point Likert scale assessed the relevance of each teleconsultation practice in four key domains: prevention, gynaecology and antenatal and postnatal care. Consensus was determined by applying a dual-criteria approach: the median score on a 9-point Likert scale and the percentage of votes either below 5 or 5 and higher. SETTING: The study was conducted at a national level in France and involved multiple healthcare centres and professionals from various geographical locations. PARTICIPANTS: The panel comprised 22 French experts with 19 healthcare professionals, including 12 midwives, 3 obstetricians-gynaecologists, 4 general practitioners and 3 healthcare system users. Participants were selected to include diverse practice settings encompassing hospital and private practices in both rural and urban areas. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The study's primary outcome was the identification of gynaecological and obstetrical care practices suitable for teleconsultation. Secondary outcomes included the level of professional consensus on these practices. RESULTS: In total, 71 practices were included in the Delphi survey. The practices approved for teleconsultation were distributed as follows: 92% in prevention (n=12/13), 55% in gynaecology (n=18/33), 31% in prenatal care (n=5/16) and 12% in postnatal care (n=1/9). Lastly, 10 practices remained under discussion: 7 in gynaecology, 2 in prenatal care and 1 in postnatal care. CONCLUSIONS: Our consensus survey highlights both the advantages and limitations of teleconsultations for women's gynaecological and obstetrical care, emphasising the need for careful consideration and tailored implementation.

Does the use of antipyretics prolong illness? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the effects of antipyretics in acute upper and lower respiratory tract infections.

OBJECTIVE: Fever contributes to the inflammatory response; in some infections, antipyretics could prolong the illness. The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact of antipyretic treatments on the evolution of acute upper and lower respiratory tract infections (RTI). METHOD: A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with meta-analysis was conducted. Our primary endpoint was the time to recovery from illness. Our prespecified secondary endpoints were quality of life, duration and number of fever episodes, repeated medical visits, and adverse events. RESULTS: Out of the 1466 references found, 25 RCTs were included. There were two studies assessing mean fever clearance time, and five studies examining the duration of symptoms associated with the illness studied. No statistically significant differences were found when pooling the results of the different studies. The assessment of adverse events showed a significant difference disadvantaging non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. No meta-analysis could be performed for our other secondary endpoints. The quality of the evidence is limited by the small number of studies included for our primary endpoint and by heterogeneity between the studies. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the use of antipyretics does not prolong or shorten illness duration in acute upper and lower RTI. The symptomatic efficacy of antipyretics must be weighed against their adverse effects, particularly when fever is well-tolerated.