ABSTRACT
In ventral fusion after anterior cervical discectomy there is still a remarkable number of cage subsidence and segmental kyphosis seen. The aim of the present study is to assess whether the cage design influences the extent of correction loss during follow-up. Sixty patients with single-level cervical disc herniation were randomly treated with two different cervical inter-body cages (group 1: Solis cage, Stryker Company and group 2: Shell cage, AMT Company). Clinical and radiological follow-up was done before and after surgery, 3 and 6 months post-surgery. Clinical follow-up was done with the help of Odom's criteria. Both groups were similar in the baseline parameters (age, sex, treated level). Statistically, the subsidence was significantly higher at 3 and 6-month follow-ups in group 1 than in group 2, however, clinical results showed no significant differences. In 67%, subsidence was seen in the anterior lower aspect of the treated segment. Segmental kyphosis was seen in seven patients of group 1 and two patients of group 2. A significant correlation is found between Odom's criteria and subsidence. Although there was no significant difference in a short-term clinical result between the two treatment groups, we recommend the use of cages which preserve the determined segmental height and lordosis.
Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Diskectomy , Internal Fixators/adverse effects , Kyphosis/etiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Equipment Design , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kyphosis/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Spine/diagnostic imaging , Spine/pathology , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Multilevel discectomy and inter-vertebral body fusion combined with anterior plate-screw fixation is the common procedure in cervical spine surgery. The correct placement of the screws is an important factor for the outcome of these operations. Yet no systematic approach has been undertaken to optimize the geometry of the fixation-plates regarding the position of the screw-perforations. In this study MRI scans of 50 consecutive patients were analyzed regarding the height of each segment (C3-C7), the anterior-posterior diameter of the vertebral body and the distance between the vertebral arteries. Based on this data we developed "Standard Spine Models". Using these models we designed two plates each for single and two-level surgery, and three plates each for three- and four-level surgery. These ten plates do fit the cervical spines of all 50 patients examined in this study. With these plates the screw-perforations could be positioned efficiently over the bodies of the concerned vertebrae. This should facilitate the selection of a plate and the positioning of the screws. Thus the surgeons might save time and the screws might be positioned more exactly and entirely in the vertebral bodies, ensuring a secure fixation.