Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 32(5): 561-565, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35501952

ABSTRACT

Introduction: While laparoscopy is now widely accepted for inguinal hernia repair in infants, it traditionally has required general anesthesia. We sought to evaluate the safety of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in infants under spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all inguinal hernia repairs at a single institution between December 2011 and June 2019 in patients younger than 6 months of age. Four groups were compared: laparoscopic under general anesthesia, laparoscopic with spinal anesthesia, open with spinal anesthesia, and open under general anesthesia. Main outcome measures include operative time, cost, and postoperative outcomes. These were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis median comparison. Results: Of the 226 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 54% (122/226) of patients underwent general anesthesia, while 46% (104/226) had spinal. When compared to general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia was associated with significantly shorter procedure times (P < .01) and lower cost (P < .01) for both open and laparoscopic approaches. Complications were few and underpowered to calculate significance across each group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can be safely performed in infants under spinal anesthesia without significant compromise of early perioperative outcomes. Advantages may include shorter procedure time and lower cost.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Spinal , Hernia, Inguinal , Laparoscopy , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Laparoscopy/methods , Ligation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 37(12): e780-e783, 2021 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30829845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fatal child abuse can be mistaken for sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) in the emergency department setting. It is unknown if there are characteristics that distinguish abusive from nonabusive causes of SUIDs in the emergency department. METHODS: Using a matched case-control design, we reviewed the medical examiner records of deaths of infants younger than 12 months who were found unresponsive at a residence, required cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and had a complete forensic autopsy between 2009 and 2015. Infants with a manner of death as homicide were cases; controls were those with the manner of death as accident, natural, or undetermined. Each case was matched with 5 controls based on age (months). Differences between cases and controls were evaluated with respect to demographic, parental, and household characteristics and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 12 cases (homicides) and 169 controls (nonhomicides), of which 60 were selected for the matched analysis. We found no significant differences between cases and controls with respect to age, race, sex, maternal substance use, Child Protective Services involvement prior to death, presence of male head of household, surviving siblings, or emergency medical services transport. Cases were more likely to have Child Protective Services involvement at the time of death (83% vs 38%; P = 0.01), sentinel injuries (odds ratio, 9.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-122.43), and return of spontaneous circulation (odds ratio, 29.99; 95% confidence interval, 3.70-241.30). CONCLUSIONS: Child Protective Services agency involvement at time of death, sentinel injury, and return of spontaneous circulation were more often associated with abusive causes of SUID. Further study is needed to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse , Sudden Infant Death , Accidents , Autopsy , Cause of Death , Child Abuse/diagnosis , Female , Homicide , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Retrospective Studies , Sudden Infant Death/epidemiology , Sudden Infant Death/etiology
3.
Conn Med ; 80(5): 291-6, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27328578

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine if driving simulator training lowers motor vehicle crash (MVC) rates for novice teen drivers. We enrolled 215 high school students, and randomly assigned 89 to the control group, and 126 to the intervention group. Twelve months after the intervention, participants completed a survey asking about crash history and driving infractions. Nearly two-thirds (n = 137, 63%) of participants completed the presimulator survey, follow-up survey, and obtained a license. Nearly one-third of the intervention group (n = 42, 33%) completed some of the 12 simulator training modules: 2-5 modules (n = 8, 19%), 6-11 modules (n = 7, 17%), and all 12 modules (n = 27, 64%). Postsimulator training involvement in a MVC (intervention = 19.0% vs control = 12.0%, P > .05) and driving infractions (intervention = 7.1% vs control = 18.0%, P > .05) did not differ significantly. Simulator training did not produce a measurable reduction in self-reported driving infractions and MVCs. Future evaluation of driving simulator training should include approaches that ensure higher completion rates.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Automobile Driving/education , Simulation Training/methods , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Connecticut , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...