Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Tumori ; 102(5): 508-513, 2016 10 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26166222

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To investigate clinicopathologic characteristics, therapeutic methods, and prognostic factors in women with synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers (SEOCs). METHODS: A retrospective review of 2 cancer registry databases in Turkey was conducted to identify patients diagnosed with SEOCs between January 1995 and December 2012. Patients with recurrent, metastatic, and metachronously occurring tumors were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify prognostic predictors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The analysis included 63 women with SEOCs. Seventy-six percent of the patients had stage I endometrial cancer, and 60% of the patients had stage I ovarian cancer. Thirty-seven patients (58.7%) had endometrioid/endometrioid histology. Optimal cytoreduction was obtained in 47 (74.6%) patients. Recurrence developed in 17 patients (27%). Multivariate analysis confirmed lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as an independent poor prognostic factor for OS (odds ratio [OR] 3.1, p = 0.045), whereas early-stage disease and optimal cytoreduction were found to be independent good prognostic factors for both PFS (OR 12.85, p<0.001 and OR 4.58, p = 0.004, respectively) and OS (OR 7.31, p = 0.002 and OR 2.95, p = 0.028, respectively). The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 74% and 69%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that optimal cytoreduction, early-stage disease, and LVSI are the most significant factors affecting survival in women with SEOC.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Biomarkers, Tumor , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnosis , Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality , Endometrial Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/mortality , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Turkey/epidemiology
2.
Turk J Obstet Gynecol ; 12(3): 158-163, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28913061

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment methods, survival, and prognosis of uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with ULMS who were treated between January 1998 and October 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 37 women who met the inclusion criteria were included in the present study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the risk factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The majority of patients had stage 1 disease (IA, n=9 (24.3%); IB, n=23 (62.1%)). All patients underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Additionally, only pelvic, and pelvic plus para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 5 (13.5%) and 8 (21.6%) women, respectively. Adjuvant treatment was administered to 27 (72.9%) patients. Patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy had stage 1 disease. Recurrences occurred in 5 (13.5%) patients. The median follow-up period was 71 months (range 1-158 months). The 5-year PFS and OS rates were 68% and 74%, for all patients. The 5-year OS rates for women with stage 1 and ≥ stage 2 disease were 82% and 27%, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed stage 1 disease as the only independent predictor of both PFS (Odds ratio (OR) 10.955, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.686-71.181, (p=0.012)) and OS (OR 57.429, 95% CI 3.287-1003.269, (p=0.006)). CONCLUSIONS: Extensive surgery is not associated with prognosis and stage 1 disease is the only independent good prognostic factor for survival in patients with ULMS.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...