Off-label psychopharmacologic prescribing for children: history supports close clinical monitoring.

The review presents pediatric adverse drug events from a historical perspective and focuses on selected safety issues associated with off-label use of medications for the psychiatric treatment of youth. Clinical monitoring procedures for major psychotropic drug classes are reviewed. Prior studies suggest that systematic treatment monitoring is warranted so as to both minimize risk of unexpected adverse events and exposures to ineffective treatments. Clinical trials to establish the efficacy and safety of drugs currently being used off-label in the pediatric population are needed. In the meantime, clinicians should consider the existing evidence-base for these drugs and institute close clinical monitoring.

The ethical use of placebo in clinical trials involving children.

The authors reviewed various statements describing the ethical use of placebo-controls in clinical trials involving minors. Attention was focused upon the Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Studies to Evaluate Drugs in Pediatric Populations, published by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) (Kaufman et al. 1995). A brief review of certain key documents and a possible expansion of the guidelines are presented. Specifically, it is recommended that a review and update of guidelines for the use of placebo-controlled trials in children be undertaken by a working group comprised of stakeholders, including academic clinical and research professionals, bioethicists, consumers, members of key government agencies, and the pharmaceutical industry.

AACAP 2002 research forum: placebo and alternatives to placebo in randomized controlled trials in pediatric psychopharmacology.

OBJECTIVE: The use of placebo in the pediatric age group has come under increasing scrutiny. At the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, the Academy's Workgroup on Research conducted a research forum. The purpose was to identify challenges and their solutions regarding the use of placebo in randomized controlled trials in pediatric psychopharmacology. METHOD: Workgroups focused on problems and solutions in five areas: ethics and human subjects, research design and statistics, partnering with consumers, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and pharmaceutical industry perspectives, and psychosocial treatments. RESULTS: In many but not all circumstances, inclusion of a placebo control is essential to meet the scientific goals of treatment outcome research. Innovative research designs; involvement of consumers in planning and implementing research; flexibility by industry, academia, the National Institutes of Health, and regulatory agencies acting in partnership; and concomitant use of evidence-based psychosocial services can and should assist in making placebo-controlled trials acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Properly designed placebo-controlled trials remain necessary, ethical, and feasible.

Long-term, open-label study of risperidone in children with severe disruptive behaviors and below-average IQ.

OBJECTIVE: This study determined the long-term safety and effectiveness of risperidone in treating severe disruptive behavior in children with subaverage intelligence. METHOD: This 48-week, open-label extension included 107 children ages 5-12 years with severe disruptive behavior disorders (according to DSM-IV criteria and a score of > or = 24 on the conduct problem subscale of the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form) and subaverage intelligence (IQ 36-84) who completed at least 2 weeks of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of risperidone. All patients received 0.02-0.06 mg/kg/day of oral risperidone; the purpose was to accumulate long-term safety data. Scores on the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form were also obtained. RESULTS: The mean risperidone dose was 1.5 mg/day. The most common adverse events reported were somnolence (33%), headache (33%), rhinitis (28%), and weight gain (21%). Somnolence was usually mild and transient. The mean weight increase was 5.5 kg; half was attributable to developmentally expected growth. Transient and asymptomatic increases in prolactin levels were observed. There were no significant changes in Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale scores and no cases of tardive dyskinesia. No clinically relevant changes in ECGs or vital signs were noted. Risperidone was associated with rapid, significant improvement on the conduct problem subscale score of the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form in patients previously treated with placebo; improvement was maintained during long-term treatment and in patients previously given risperidone. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term risperidone appears to be generally safe, well tolerated, and effective for treating severely disruptive behaviors in children with subaverage intelligence.

Treatment recommendations for the use of antipsychotics for aggressive youth (TRAAY). Part II.

OBJECTIVE: To develop treatment recommendations for the use of antipsychotic medications for children and adolescents with serious psychiatric disorders and externalizing behavior problems. METHOD: Using a combination of evidence- and consensus-based methodologies, recommendations were developed in six phases as informed by three primary sources of information: (1) current scientific evidence (published and unpublished), (2) the expressed needs for treatment-relevant information and guidance specified by clinicians in a series of focus groups, and (3) consensus of clinical and research experts derived from a formal survey and a consensus workshop. RESULTS: Fourteen treatment recommendations on the use of atypical antipsychotics for aggression in youth with comorbid psychiatric conditions were developed. Each recommendation corresponds to one of the phases of care (evaluation, treatment, stabilization, and maintenance) and includes a brief clinical rationale that draws upon the available scientific evidence and consensus expert opinion derived from survey data and a consensus workshop. CONCLUSION: Until additional research from controlled trials becomes available, these evidence- and consensus-based treatment recommendations may be a useful approach to guide the use of antipsychotics in youth with aggression.

Treatment recommendations for the use of antipsychotics for aggressive youth (TRAAY). Part I: a review.

OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence for the safety and efficacy of nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments for aggression in children and adolescents. METHOD: and searches (1990-present) were conducted for double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of atypical antipsychotics for aggression and for literature on the use of other pharmacological agents and psychosocial interventions for aggression. Case reports and adult literature regarding the safety of atypical antipsychotics were used where controlled data for youth were lacking. RESULTS: Controlled data on the treatment of aggression in youth is scarce. Psychosocial interventions may be effective alone or in combination with pharmacological treatments. Psychotropic agents (e.g., stimulants, mood stabilizers, beta-blockers) have also been shown to have limited efficacy in reducing aggression. Antipsychotics, particularly the atypical antipsychotics, show substantial efficacy in the treatment of aggression in selected pediatric populations. Atypical antipsychotics are generally associated with fewer extrapyramidal symptoms than are typical antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial interventions and atypical antipsychotics are promising treatments for aggression in youth. Double-blind studies should examine the safety and efficacy of atypical antipsychotics compared to each other and to medications from other classes, the efficacy of specific medications for different subtypes of aggression, combining various psychotropic medications, optimal dosages, and long-term safety.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of risperidone for the treatment of disruptive behaviors in children with subaverage intelligence.

OBJECTIVE: The short-term efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of disruptive behaviors was examined in a well-characterized cohort of children with subaverage intelligence. METHOD: In this 6-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study of 118 children (aged 5-12 years) with severely disruptive behaviors and subaverage intelligence (IQ between 36 and 84, inclusive), the subjects received 0.02-0.06 mg/kg per day of risperidone oral solution or placebo. The a priori primary efficacy measure was the change in score from baseline to endpoint on the conduct problem subscale of the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form. RESULTS: The risperidone group showed significantly greater improvement than did the placebo group on the conduct problem subscale of the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form from week 1 through endpoint (change in score of -15.2 and -6.2, respectively). Risperidone was also associated with significantly greater improvement than placebo on all other Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form subscales at endpoint, as well as on the Aberrant Behavior Checklist subscales for irritability, lethargy/social withdrawal, and hyperactivity; the Behavior Problems Inventory aggressive/destructive behavior subscale; a visual analogue scale of the most troublesome symptom; and the Clinical Global Impression change score. The most common adverse effects reported during risperidone treatment were headache and somnolence. The extrapyramidal symptom profile of risperidone was comparable to that of placebo. Mean weight increases of 2.2 kg. and 0.9 kg occurred in the risperidone and placebo groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of severely disruptive behaviors in children with subaverage IQ.