Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Scand J Med Sci Sports ; 27(12): 2040-2047, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27917543

ABSTRACT

This research investigated whether and how self-determined motivation predicts perceived susceptibility to injury during competition (marathon). Two correlational studies including 378 (Study 1) and 339 (Study 2) marathon runners were conducted. Participants filled out a questionnaire the day before the race measuring self-determined motivation, perceived susceptibilities to marathon-related injury and to keep running through pain, and control variables. Study 1 showed that self-determined motivation was negatively related to perceived susceptibility to marathon-related injury. Study 2 replicated this finding and showed that this relationship was partially mediated by perceived susceptibility to keep running through pain during the race. Moreover, results indicated that the predictive role of self-determination was mostly driven by controlled forms of motivation, and more particularly external regulation. These results suggest that self-determined motivation for sport is a protective factor of injury.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/psychology , Competitive Behavior , Motivation , Personal Autonomy , Protective Factors , Running/injuries , Adult , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Running/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Pain Res Manag ; 2016: 7134825, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27445624

ABSTRACT

Background. Through real-time behavioral observation systems, pain behaviors are commonly used by clinicians to estimate pain intensity in patients with low back pain. However, little is known about how clinicians rely on pain-related behaviors to make their judgment. According to the Information Integration Theory (IIT) framework, this study aimed at investigating how clinicians value and integrate information from lumbopelvic kinematics (LK), a protective pain behavior, and facial expression intensity (FEI), a communicative pain behavior, to estimate pain in patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP). Methods. Twenty-one experienced clinicians and twenty-one novice clinicians were asked to estimate back pain intensity from a virtual character performing a trunk flexion-extension task. Results. Results revealed that both populations relied on facial expression and that only half of the participants in each group integrated FEI and LK to estimate cLBP intensity. Among participants who integrated the two pain behaviors, averaging rule predominated among others. Results showed that experienced clinicians relied equally on FEI and LK to estimate pain, whereas novice clinicians mostly relied on FEI. Discussion. The use of additive rule of integration does not appear to be systematic when assessing others' pain. When assessing pain intensity, communicative and protective pain behaviors may have different relevance.


Subject(s)
Biomechanical Phenomena/physiology , Facial Expression , Judgment , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Low Back Pain/psychology , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Female , Humans , Lumbosacral Region/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Perception/physiology , Pelvis , Posture , Visual Analog Scale , Young Adult
4.
Eur J Appl Physiol ; 111(4): 611-20, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20938782

ABSTRACT

During leg flexion from erect posture, postural stability is organized in advance during "anticipatory postural adjustments" (APA). During these APA, inertial forces are generated that propel the centre of gravity (CoG) laterally towards stance leg side. This study examined how fear of falling (FoF) may influence this anticipatory postural control of medio-lateral (ML) stability. Ten young healthy participants performed a series of leg flexions at maximal velocity from low and high surface heights (6 and 66 cm above ground, respectively). In this latter condition with increased FoF, stance foot was placed at the lateral edge of the support surface to induce maximal postural threat. Results showed that the amplitude of ML inertial forces generated during APA decreased with FoF; this decrease was compensated by an increase in APA duration so that the CoG position at time of swing foot-off was located further towards stance leg side. With these changes in ML APA, the CoG was propelled in the same final (unipodal) position above stance foot as in condition with low FoF. These results contrast with those obtained in the literature during quiet standing which showed that FoF did not have any influence on the ML component of postural control. It is proposed that ML APA are modified with increased FoF, in such a way that the risk of a sideway fall induced by the large CoG motion is attenuated.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Anticipation, Psychological/physiology , Fear/physiology , Leg/physiology , Postural Balance/physiology , Posture/physiology , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Biological , Movement/physiology , Perception/physiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...