Ambient air pollution and lung cancer risk among never-smokers in the Women's Health Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Ambient air pollution is classified as a human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). However, epidemiologic studies supporting this classification have focused on lung cancer mortality rather than incidence, and spatial and temporal resolutions of exposure estimates have varied considerably across studies. METHODS: We evaluated the association of outdoor air pollution and lung cancer incidence among never-smoking participants of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study, a large, US-based cohort of postmenopausal women (N = 65,419; 265 cases). We used geospatial models to estimate exposures to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) based on residential addresses at baseline and throughout follow-up. We also characterized exposures to traffic-related air pollution by proximity to major roadways. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for the risk of lung cancer in association with these exposure metrics using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: No compelling associations of PM2.5 and NO2 exposures with lung cancer risk were observed. An increased risk of lung cancer was observed when comparing those individuals with residences <50 versus ≥200 meters from a primary limited access highway (HR = 5.23; 95% confidence interval = 1.94, 14.13). CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not exclude lung cancer risk estimates observed in association with PM2.5 and NO2 exposures identified in previous studies. Our results suggest that residential proximity to major roadways may be a proxy for carcinogenic exposures not correlated with PM2.5 or NO2 levels. New studies of air pollution and lung cancer incidence should characterize additional aspects of proximity to major roadways.

Poultry and livestock exposure and cancer risk among farmers in the agricultural health study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate cancer risk associated with raising animals as commodities, which is associated with a variety of exposures, such as infectious agents and endotoxins. METHODS: Information was available for 49,884 male farmers in the Agricultural Health Study, who reported livestock and poultry production at enrollment (1993-1997). Cancer incidence data were obtained through annual linkage to state registries. Using Poisson regression analyses, we evaluated whether the number and type of animals raised on the farm impacted cancer risk. RESULTS: Overall, 31,848 (63.8%) male farmers reported raising any animals. Lung cancer risk decreased with increasing number of livestock on the farm (p trend = 0.04) and with raising poultry (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4-0.97). Raising poultry was associated with an increased risk of colon cancer (RR = 1.4; 95% CI: 0.99-2.0) with further increased with larger flocks (p trend = 0.02). Risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma was also elevated in those who raised poultry (RR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0-2.4), but there was no evidence of increased risk with larger flocks (p trend = 0.5). Raising sheep was associated with a significantly increased risk of multiple myeloma (RR = 4.9; 95% CI: 2.4-12.0). Performing veterinary services increased the risk of Hodgkin lymphoma (RR = 12.2; 95% CI: 1.6-96.3). CONCLUSIONS: We observed an inverse association between raising poultry and livestock and lung cancer risk and some evidence of increased risk of specific lymphohematopoietic malignancies with specific types of animals and performing veterinary services. Further research into associations between raising animals and cancer risk should focus on identification of etiologic agents.

Retinal degeneration and other eye disorders in wives of farmer pesticide applicators enrolled in the agricultural health study.

Retinal degeneration is the leading cause of visual impairment in older adults. An association between retinal degeneration and fungicide use was observed previously among farmer pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study, a large study of farm families from Iowa and North Carolina. The objective of this investigation was to determine whether wives of these farmer pesticide applicators were at increased risk of retinal degeneration. Self-reported cross-sectional data obtained via questionnaire between 1993 and 1997 from 31,173 wives were used. Associations of specific pesticides and groups of pesticides based on function (fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, and fumigants) or chemical structure (organophosphates, organochlorines, and carbamates) with eye disorders were evaluated using logistic and hierarchical logistic regression analyses. Self-reported retinal degeneration was associated with the wife's fungicide use (odds ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.2, 3.1) after adjustment for age and state of residence. Specific fungicides that appeared to drive this association were maneb or mancozeb and ziram. No associations between pesticide use and other eye disorders were found. Although these findings for retinal degeneration are based solely on self-reported disease, they are consistent with those reported for farmer pesticide applicators. These findings suggest that exposure to some fungicides and other pesticides may increase the risk of retinal degeneration and warrant further investigation.