ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The viral pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted cancer patient management around the world. Most reported data relate to incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe COVID-19. The safety of systemic anti-cancer therapy in oncology patients with non-severe COVID-19 is an important matter in daily practice. METHODS: ONCOSARS-1 was a single-center, academic observational study. Adult patients with solid tumors treated in the oncology day unit with systemic anti-cancer therapy during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium were prospectively included. All patients (n = 363) underwent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) serological testing after the first peak of the pandemic in Belgium. Additionally, 141 of these patients also had a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test during the pandemic. The main objective was to retrospectively determine the safety of systemic cancer treatment, measured by the rate of adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared with SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. RESULTS: Twenty-two (6%) of the 363 eligible patients were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and/or serology. Of these, three required transient oxygen supplementation, but none required admission to the intensive care unit. Hematotoxicity was the only adverse event more frequently observed in SARS-CoV-2 -positive patients than in SARS-CoV-2-negative patients: 73% vs 35% (P < 0.001). This association remained significant (odds ratio (OR) 4.1, P = 0.009) even after adjusting for performance status and type of systemic treatment. Hematological adverse events led to more treatment delays for the SARS-CoV-2-positive group: 55% vs 20% (P < 0.001). Median duration of treatment interruption was similar between the two groups: 14 and 11 days, respectively. Febrile neutropenia, infections unrelated to COVID-19, and bleeding events occurred at a low rate in the SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. CONCLUSION: Systemic anti-cancer therapy appeared safe in ambulatory oncology patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were, however, more treatment delays in the SARS-CoV-2-positive population, mainly due to a higher rate of hematological adverse events.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Belgium/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Cancer Care Facilities , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Cutaneous metastases from cervix cancer are rarely described, and can appear years after a complete remission of the cancer. They may have multiple presentation as nodules, papules or telangiectasies. Unfortunately, these are associated with poor prognosis. We here report the case of a woman who developed cutaneous metastasis in the situation of a cervix cancer that appears to be stable under bevacizumab.
Les métastases cutanées provenant du cancer du col de l'utérus sont rarement décrites, et peuvent apparaître plusieurs années après une rémission complète du cancer. Elles peuvent avoir plusieurs types de présentations telles que : nodules, papules, télangiectasies. Malheureusement, ces dernières sont associées à un mauvais pronostic. Nous rapportons le cas d'une patiente qui a développé des métastases cutanées alors que son cancer primitif était stable sous traitement par bévacizumab.
