Microphysiological systems in early stage drug development: Perspectives on current applications and future impact.

Microphysiological systems (MPS) are making advances to provide more standardized and predictive physiologically relevant responses to test articles in living tissues and organ systems. The excitement surrounding the potential of MPS to better predict human responses to medicines and improving clinical translation is overshadowed by their relatively slow adoption by the pharmaceutical industry and regulators. Collaboration between multiorganizational consortia and regulators is necessary to build an understanding of the strengths and limitations of MPS models and closing the current gaps. Here, we review some of the advances in MPS research, focusing on liver, intestine, vascular system, kidney and lung and present examples highlighting the context of use for these systems. For MPS to gain a foothold in drug development, they must have added value over existing approaches. Ideally, the application of MPS will augment in vivo studies and reduce the use of animals via tiered screening with less reliance on exploratory toxicology studies to screen compounds. Because MPS support multiple cell types (e.g. primary or stem-cell derived cells) and organ systems, identifying when MPS are more appropriate than simple 2D in vitro models for understanding physiological responses to test articles is necessary. Once identified, MPS models require qualification for that specific context of use and must be reproducible to allow future validation. Ultimately, the challenges of balancing complexity with reproducibility will inform the promise of advancing the MPS field and are critical for realization of the goal to reduce, refine and replace (3Rs) the use of animals in nonclinical research.

Comparative nonclinical assessments of the biosimilar PF-06410293 and originator adalimumab.

Adalimumab, a recombinant fully human monoclonal antibody targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF), is approved in the United States and Europe to treat various inflammatory and autoimmune indications. Biosimilars are approved biologics highly similar, but not identical, to approved biotherapeutics. To support clinical development of PF-06410293, an adalimumab biosimilar, nonclinical studies evaluated the structural, functional, toxicologic, and toxicokinetic similarity to originator adalimumab sourced from the United States (adalimumab-US) and European Union (adalimumab-EU). Structural similarity was assessed by peptide mapping. Biologic activity was measured via inhibition of TNF-induced apoptosis and Fc-based functionality assessments. In vivo nonclinical similarity was evaluated in a toxicity study in cynomolgus monkeys administered subcutaneous PF-06410293 or adalimumab-EU (0 or 157 mg/kg/week). Peptide mapping demonstrated PF-06410293, adalimumab-US, and adalimumab-EU had identical amino acid sequences. Comparative functional and binding assessments were similar. Effects of PF-06410293 and adalimumab-EU were similar and limited to pharmacologically mediated decreased cellularity of lymphoid follicles and germinal centers in spleen. Toxicokinetics were similar; maximum plasma concentration and area-under-the-concentration-time curve ratio of PF-06410293:adalimumab-EU ranged from 1.0 to 1.2. These studies supported PF-06410293 entry into clinical development. Many regulatory agencies now only request nonclinical in vivo testing if there is residual uncertainty regarding biosimilarity after in vitro analytical studies.

Evaluation of Therapeutics for Severely Debilitating or Life-Threatening Diseases or Conditions: Defining Scope to Enable Global Guidance Development.

A significant regulatory gap exists to facilitate global development of therapeutics for nononcology severely debilitating or life-threatening diseases or conditions (SDLTs). In a 2017 publication, a streamlined approach to the development of treatments for SDLTs was proposed to facilitate earlier and continued patient access to new, potentially beneficial therapeutics.1 However, a major hindrance to broad adoption of this streamlined approach has been the lack of universally accepted, objective criteria to define SDLTs. This article serves to extend the 2017 publication by further addressing the challenge of defining SDLT scope in order to stimulate broader discussion and facilitate development of regional and ultimately international guidelines on the development of therapeutics for SDLTs. Using case examples, we describe key attributes of SDLTs and provide criteria for consideration of an SDLT scope definition.

An Industry Perspective on the 2017 EMA Guideline on First-in-Human and Early Clinical Trials.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2017 issued a revised guideline on nonclinical and clinical aspects of first-in-human (FIH) and early clinical trials (CTs). External input was solicited during a draft comment phase, and although some industry suggestions were adopted, others were not. We agree that subject safety is of utmost priority, and believe that minimizing risk must be balanced with efficient and informative study designs to bring new medicines to patients.

Industry Perspective on Biomarker Development and Qualification.

Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies routinely use biomarkers to obtain quantitative metrics for drug exposure, efficacy, and safety and to inform clinical trial design with regard to patient selection, treatments, and outcomes. Biomarker science has the unique capability to catalyze precompetitive collaborations between academia, industry, regulatory agencies, and other stakeholders with the ultimate goal of accelerating the delivery of safe and effective medicines to patients, particularly in areas of high unmet need.

Current nonclinical testing paradigms in support of safe clinical trials: An IQ Consortium DruSafe perspective.

The transition from nonclinical to First-in-Human (FIH) testing is one of the most challenging steps in drug development. In response to serious outcomes in a recent Phase 1 trial (sponsored by Bial), IQ Consortium/DruSafe member companies reviewed their nonclinical approach to progress small molecules safely to FIH trials. As a common practice, safety evaluation begins with target selection and continues through iterative in silico and in vitro screening to identify molecules with increased probability of acceptable in vivo safety profiles. High attrition routinely occurs during this phase. In vivo exploratory and pivotal FIH-enabling toxicity studies are then conducted to identify molecules with a favorable benefit-risk profile for humans. The recent serious incident has reemphasized the importance of nonclinical testing plans that are customized to the target, the molecule, and the intended clinical plan. Despite the challenges and inherent risks of transitioning from nonclinical to clinical testing, Phase 1 studies have a remarkably good safety record. Given the rapid scientific evolution of safety evaluation, testing paradigms and regulatory guidance must evolve with emerging science. The authors posit that the practices described herein, together with science-based risk assessment and management, support safe FIH trials while advancing development of important new medicines.

Nonclinical Evaluation of PF-06438179: A Potential Biosimilar to Remicade® (Infliximab).

INTRODUCTION: PF-06438179, a potential biosimilar to Remicade® (infliximab, Janssen Biotech, Inc.), is a chimeric mouse-human monoclonal antibody targeting human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF). METHODS: Analytical (small subset reported here) and nonclinical studies compared the structural, functional, and in vivo nonclinical similarity of PF-06438179 with Remicade sourced from the United States (infliximab-US) and/or European Union (infliximab-EU). RESULTS: The peptide map profiles were superimposable, and peptide masses were the same, indicating identical amino acid sequences. Data on post-translational modifications, biochemical properties, and biological function provided strong support for analytical similarity. Administration of a single intravenous (IV) dose (10 or 50 mg/kg) of PF-06438179 or infliximab-EU to male rats was well tolerated. There were no test article-related clinical signs or effects on body weight or food consumption. Systemic exposures [maximum drug concentration (C max) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)] in rats administered PF-06438179 or infliximab-EU were similar, with mean exposure ratio of PF-06438179 relative to infliximab-EU ranging from 0.88 to 1.16. No rats developed anti-drug antibodies. A 2-week IV toxicity study was conducted with once-weekly administration of 10 or 50 mg/kg of PF-06438179 to male and female rats. PF-06438179-related hyperplasia of sinusoidal cells occurred in the liver in rats administered 50 mg/kg, but was not adverse based on its minimal to mild severity. The no-observed adverse-effect level for PF-06438179 was 50 mg/kg. At this dose, C max was 1360 µg/mL and AUC at 168 h was 115,000 µg h/mL on day 8. CONCLUSIONS: The analytical and nonclinical studies have supported advancement of PF-06438179 into global comparative clinical trials. FUNDING: Pfizer Inc.

An evaluation of reproductive and developmental toxicity of sitaxentan (thelin) in rats.

Sitaxentan sodium (Thelin) is a once daily, orally bioavailable, highly selective endothelin A receptor antagonist. Initially approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension, sitaxentan was withdrawn in 2010 following the recognition of a pattern of idiosyncratic liver injury. During development of this drug, a series of nonclinical studies investigated the effects of orally administered sitaxentan on fertility, embryofetal development, and pre- and postnatal development in the rat; results of these studies are reported here. In the fertility study, sitaxentan did not affect mating behavior, fertility, sperm morphology, or estrous cycle. Sitaxentan was teratogenic in the embyrofetal development study, which was expected based on its pharmacologic mechanism of action. Teratogenic effects included malformations of the head, mouth, face, and large blood vessels. In the pre- and postnatal study, sitaxentan administration was associated with reduced pup survival, large or abnormally shaped livers, and delays in markers of auditory and sexual development. Sitaxentan was detected in plasma of suckling pups receiving milk from females dosed with sitaxentan. These nonclinical study findings were reflected in the sitaxentan product label warnings.

Evaluation of sitaxentan (Thelin®) toxicity in juvenile rats and regulatory interactions during the development of a European Medicines Agency pediatric investigation plan.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by increasing pulmonary vascular resistance leading to right heart failure and death. Sitaxentan (Thelin®) demonstrated efficacy in adult PAH; however, PAH therapy for children is critically needed. To support development for pediatric patients, sitaxentan (10, 30, or 60mg/kg/day) toxicity was assessed in juvenile (postnatal day 22-14weeks) rats. Sitaxentan did not affect survival, clinical signs, or body weight; no target organ of toxicity was identified. Hematologic changes were decreased erythrocyte parameters, prothrombin time, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Reproductive development and function in both sexes was unaffected, as assessed by mating performance; fertility, estrous cyclicity, and maintenance of normal pregnancy up to mid-gestation; sperm count, morphology, and motility; and testicular changes. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) on reproductive development and function was 60mg/kg/day; for toxicity, the NOAEL was 30mg/kg/day (coagulation parameter changes). Sitaxentan did not adversely affect physical development, cognitive ability, or reproductive function at exposures that were 58- and 61-fold higher than those found in adults after therapeutic exposure (100mg/day). This study is discussed in the context of evolving European pediatric drug legislation and guidance.

An overview of the preclinical toxicity and potential carcinogenicity of sitaxentan (Thelin®), a potent endothelin receptor antagonist developed for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Sitaxentan (Thelin®), an endothelin receptor antagonist with a long duration of action and high specificity for the endothelin receptor A subtype, was used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension. It was withdrawn from the market due to an idiosyncratic risk of drug-induced liver injury identified from emerging clinical trial data and clinical case reports. The preclinical safety profile of sitaxentan is presented, including single- and repeat-dose toxicity in mice, rats, and dogs and carcinogenicity in mice and rats. Sitaxentan-related adverse effects included coagulopathy in rats and dogs, increased serum alkaline phosphatase activity in mice and dogs, and hepatic hypertrophy in all species. Decreased albumin, erythrocyte count, hemoglobin concentration and hematocrit, and increased coagulation times and liver weight were also noted. These effects generally occurred at systemic exposures (AUC(0-24)) that were substantially greater than those seen in humans. Twice-daily (vs. once daily) dosing resulted in increased toxicity, which correlated with increased trough plasma sitaxentan concentrations. Sitaxentan appeared to have a low potential for testicular and hepatic toxicity and was not carcinogenic. These studies suggested that sitaxentan would have a reasonable margin of safety when used as directed in humans and supported a positive benefit:risk assessment at the time of marketing approval.