ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In the past decade, online physician review websites have become an important source of information for patients, with the largest and most popular being Healthgrades.com. Our study aims to investigate demographic and volume-based trends for online reviews of every Healthgrades-listed orthopaedic surgeon through a nationwide, retrospective analysis. METHODS: All available demographic and rating information for orthopaedic surgeons (n = 28,713; Healthgrades.com) was analyzed using one-way Analysis of Variance, Tukey Studentized Range (Honestly Significant Difference), linear regression, and Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean rating for all surgeons was 3.99 (SD 0.92), and the mean number of ratings was 13.43 (SD 20.4). Men had a greater mean rating at 4.02 compared with women at 3.91 (P < 0.0001), and DO surgeons had greater mean rating at 4.11 compared with MD surgeons at 3.90 (P < 0.0001). The correlation between rating and age had a significant negative correlation (P < 0.0001). The correlation between average online rating and number of reviews had a significant positive correlation (P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Our analysis suggests that greater online ratings are associated with the male sex and DO degrees. In addition, our study discovered that the number of ratings was positively correlated with greater mean online ratings, whereas older age was negatively correlated with greater mean online ratings.
Subject(s)
Orthopedic Surgeons , Orthopedics , Surgeons , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Satisfaction , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Many methods are used during shoulder surgery to prevent wound contamination with Cutibacterium acnes, but there are no accepted standards for prevention. Some surgeons use an electrosurgical instrument instead of a scalpel blade during open shoulder surgery in an effort to prevent deep tissue contamination with C. acnes. We sought to compare the transference rate of C. acnes between a scalpel blade at room temperature and an electrosurgical blade heated to 41°C (temperature of electrosurgical blade after standard deltopectoral approach). In our model, using a scalpel blade versus a heated electrosurgical blade resulted in no difference in pathogen transference.
ABSTRACT
Alopecia areata (AA) is a common form of non-scarring hair loss. The pathogenesis of AA is believed to involve multiple inflammatory cytokines, including possibly IL-17A. To assess the efficacy and safety of the IL-17A antagonist secukinumab in AA, we conducted a double-blinded, randomized prospective pilot study in which 11 subjects were treated with either secukinumab (n = 7) or placebo (n = 4) subcutaneously at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter until (inclusive of) week 20. The primary endpoint for the study was the percentage of patients achieving SALT50 at 24 weeks. A total of three subjects out of 11 completed the study through the primary endpoint, and therefore, we used the last observation carried forward method to analyze the missing data. At the primary endpoint or last completed observation, 0% (0/7) of the secukinumab-treated subjects achieved a 50% reduction in SALT score (SALT50), and likewise, 0% (0/4) of the placebo-treated subjects achieved SALT50. In the secukinumab group, one (14.3%) subject had some hair regrowth, one (14.3%) subject had worsening hair loss, and five (71.4%) subjects had no change in response to treatment. No adverse events attributable to the study drug were observed. The lack of a treatment response to most of our treated patients suggests that the TH17/IL-17 axis likely has no pathogenic role in AA and an alternative therapeutic approach should be considered for this disease. However, due to the low statistical power of this study, future studies may be required to corroborate these findings.
