Consequences of the first and second COVID-19 wave on kidney transplant recipients at a large Indian transplant centre.

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of data comparing the consequences of first and second COVID-19 waves on kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in India. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective study of 259 KTRs with COVID-19 to compare first wave (March 15-December 31 2020, n = 157) and second wave (April 1-May 31 2021, n = 102). RESULTS: KTRs during second wave were younger (43 vs. 40 years; p-value .04) and also included paediatric patients (0 vs. 5.9%; p-value .003). Symptoms were milder during the second wave (45 vs. 62.7%; p-value .007); COVID-19 positive patients had less frequent cough (32 vs. 13.8%; p-value .001), fever was less frequent (58 vs. 37%; p-value .001), and we observed fewer co-morbidities (11 vs. 20.6%; p-value .04). The percentages of neutrophils (77 vs. 83%; p-value .001) and serum ferritin (439 vs. 688; p-value .0006) were higher during second wave, while lymphocyte counts were reduced (20 vs. 14%; p-value .0001). Hydroxychloroquine (11 vs. 0%; p-value .0001) and tocilizumab (7 vs. 0%; p-value .004) were more frequently prescribed during first wave, while utilization of dexamethasone (6 vs. 27%; p-value .0001) and remdesivir (47 vs. 65%; p-value .03) increased during the second wave. Mucormycosis (1.3 vs. 10%; p-value .01) and ICU admissions (20 vs. 37.2%; p-value .002) were more frequent during second wave. The 28-day mortality rate (9.6 vs. 10%; p-value 1) was not different. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a different clinical spectrum of COVID-19 amongst KTR with similar mortality between the two waves at a large Indian transplant centre.

Mucormycosis as SARS-CoV2 sequelae in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center experience from India.

PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) sequelae in the transplant population are scarcely reported. Post-COVID-19 mucormycosis is one of such sequelae, which is a dreadful and rare entity. The purpose of this report was to study the full spectrum of this dual infection in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). METHODS: We did a comprehensive analysis of 11 mucormycosis cases in KTR who recovered from COVID-19 in IKDRC, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India during the study period from Nov 2020 to May 2021. We also looked for the risk factors for mucormycosis with a historical cohort of 157 KTR who did not develop mucormycosis. RESULTS: The median age (interquartile range, range) of the cohort was 42 (33.5-50, 26-60) years with 54.5% diabetes. COVID-19 severity ranged from mild (n = 10) to severe cases (n = 1). The duration from COVID-19 recovery to presentation was 7 (7-7, 4-14) days. Ten cases were Rhino-orbital-cerebral-mucormycosis (ROCM) and one had pulmonary mucormycosis. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) was performed in all cases of ROCM. The duration of antifungal therapy was 28 (24-30, 21-62) days. The mortality rate reported was 27%. The risk factors for post-transplant mucormycosis were diabetes (18% vs 54.5%; p-value = 0.01), lymphopenia [12 (10-18) vs 20 (12-26) %; p-value = 0.15] and a higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio [7 (4.6-8.3) vs 3.85 (3.3-5.8); p-value = 0.5]. CONCLUSION: The morbidity and mortality with post-COVID-19 mucormycosis are high. Post-transplant patients with diabetes are more prone to this dual infection. Preparedness and early identification is the key to improve the outcomes.

Comparative Analysis of Kidney Transplant Recipients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Compared with Nonkidney Transplant Recipients: A Largest Single-center Report from the Second Wave of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in South East Asia.

Outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) compared with matched cohort are certainly lacking for different pandemic waves and geographic regions. In this single-center retrospective study of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) cases admitted during March 26, 2021 to June 7, 2021, a propensity-matched analysis in a 1:1 ratio was performed to compare the clinical profile and outcomes between KTR and non-KTR. A Cox proportional hazard model from the whole study population to analyze risk factors for severe disease and mortality was calculated. We identified 1052 COVID-19 cases, of which 107 (10.1%) were KTR. In propensity-matched analysis, KTR had higher fever (81.6 % vs. 60%; P = 0.01), lymphopenia (30% vs. 11.7%; P = 0.02), higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (43.3% vs. 25%; P = 0.05), and acute kidney injury (66.6% vs. 36.7%; P = 0.001). In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, there was no difference in mortality or severity of COVID-19. In Cox hazard proportional analysis, the European cooperative oncology group (ECOG) score of 1 to 2 [Hazard ratio (HR) 95% lower confidence interval (CI), upper CI = 4.9 (1.8-13.5); P <0.01], ECOG of >2 [HR = 20 (7.5, 54.7); P <0.01] and waitlisted status [HR = 1.9 (1.1-3.3); P = 0.02] was associated with significant mortality. Kidney transplantation [HR = 0.8 (0.47-1.44); P = 0.5] was not associated with mortality in the analysis. In our report, kidney transplantation status had a different spectrum but was not found to be independently associated with COVID-19 severity or mortality.

A Propensity-Matched Analysis of COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients Compared With Non-Kidney Transplant Patients: A Single-Center Report From India.

OBJECTIVES: Comparisons of COVID-19 incidence between kidney transplant recipients and patients who did not receive kidney transplant are underexplored in various geographic regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Indian, single-center, retrospective study analyzed COVID-19 data of patients hospitalized between May 12, 2020, and January 11, 2021. A propensity matching score was used to compare outcomes between the 2 groups. We also used multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses to assess association of kidney transplantation with mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1627 COVID-19 cases, 179 were kidney transplant recipients and 1448 were not kidney transplant patients (control group). Ofthe 436 reported in-hospital deaths, 20 (11.1%) were in the kidney transplant group and 416 (28.7%) were in the control group. Propensity matching identified 98 kidney transplantrecipients and167 controlpatients. InKaplanMeier survival plots for these patients, there was no statistical difference in mortality (log-rank, Mantel Cox test; P = .07) or severity (log-rank, Mantel Cox test; P = .07) with regard to COVID-19. In Cox analysis, age groups from 61 to 70 years (hazard ratio = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0-2.2; P = .04), 71 to 80 years (hazard ratio = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.0-2.5; P = .02), and >80 years (hazard ratio = 1.91; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1; P = .01)were associatedwith statistically significant greater mortality.Having a kidney transplant (hazard ratio = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P = 0.001) was not associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis, age was the most important predictor of mortality. Kidney transplant status was not found to have an independent association with mortality and severity.

Long-term follow-up of SARS-CoV-2 recovered renal transplant recipients: A single-center experience from India.

INTRODUCTION: Follow-up studies of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are scarcely reported. METHODS: We studied 142 hospitalized KTR for a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 9 (8-11) months who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 during May 2020 to Dec 2020. The outcomes were to assess persistent symptoms post-discharge; EuroQoL visual analogue score (EQ-VAS); EuroQoL 5-dimension score (E5-QD-5L) score and modified medical research dyspnea score (mMRC) at 1 month, 3-month, and beyond 6 months. Graft outcome was also analyzed. RESULTS: The age of the cohort was 43 (34-69) years and COVID-19 severity ranged from asymptomatic (4%), mild (50%), moderate (35%) to severe (12%). The most common persistent symptom was fatigue which significantly decreased in the follow-up (n = 45 [32.3] vs. 10 [7.4] vs. 4 [2.9]; p-value = 0.001) at 1-month, 3-month, and beyond 6 months respectively. Decrement in the mean (standard deviation) EQ-VAS score from baseline was also improved (28.6 [13] vs. 10.4 [12.5] vs. 7.5 [12.0]; p-value = 0.012). There was significant improvement in all EQ-5D-5L scores in follow-up. There was no deterioration in mMRC scores during the follow-up (n = 4, 3% vs. 7, 5% vs. 3, 2%; p-value = 0.86). Cases requiring oxygen had significantly poorer overall scores initially, but there was no difference at 6 months. All 10 graft losses had oxygen requirement and chronic graft dysfunction at baseline. CONCLUSION: Our initial assessment reports significant improvement in the quality of life in follow-up. The majority recovered from allograft dysfunction. Further research is warranted to study the full spectrum of follow-up.

Successful management of dengue in renal transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort from a single center.

INTRODUCTION: The literature on dengue infection in renal transplant recipients has shown wide diversity in clinical presentation and outcome. The objective of this study was to report the clinical profile, short-term and long-term outcomes of dengue among renal transplant recipients. METHODS: A total of 59 post-transplant dengue suspected cases were admitted from July 2019 to April 2020 of which 31 had confirmed dengue infection. The clinical and laboratory profile of the confirmed dengue cases (n = 31) were compared with non-dengue cases (n = 28). RESULTS: Among the clinical and laboratory features retro-orbital pain, conjunctival redness, thrombocytopenia on admission, and absence of arthralgia were significantly associated with dengue compared to non-dengue cases. No mortality was observed in the dengue cases. Allograft dysfunction, acute rejection and graft losses were identified in 64.5% (n = 20), 6.4% (n = 2) and 6.4% (n = 2) dengue cases respectively. No rejection or graft losses were observed in 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We report a differential clinical profile for dengue in transplant settings which will aid in the diagnosis. We also report successful management of dengue infection in renal transplant recipients with the majority having allograft dysfunction. A long-term follow-up of the cohort was uneventful.

Feasibility and safety of remdesivir in SARS-CoV2 infected renal transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort from a developing nation.

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection has drastically impacted the transplant communities. Remdesivir (RDV) has shown some promising results in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) albeit with low certainty. Data in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are still lacking. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort of 57 moderate to severe COVID-19 positive KTR in a single center who received RDV as a part of COVID-19 management. No dose adjustments were done. The outcomes were measured as acute kidney injury (AKI) recovery; liver function tests abnormalities; other side effects; graft loss and death. RESULTS: The median (inter-quartile range) age of presentation was 44 (31-51) years. The duration from onset of symptoms to RDV initiation was 6 (5-7) days. Thirty-two (56%) cases received RDV on the day of admission. Forty-six (81%) cases were on oxygen support upon initiation of RDV. Thirty-eight (66.6%) cases had acute kidney injury on admission. The median baseline, admission, and 28-day follow-up serum creatinine of the cohort were 1.59 (1.1-2.1), 2.13 (1.3-3.1), and 1.58 (1.05-2.1) mg/dl, respectively. A total of 8(14%) cases died in the study with 1 (1.7%) graft loss. All those cases that died were on oxygen therapy at the time of initiation of RDV. No liver function derangements or any other major adverse events with the drug were reported. CONCLUSION: RDV therapy is safe and clinically feasible in renal transplant recipients as seen in our cohort. Larger clinical registries and randomized clinical trials should be conducted to further explore the efficacy in transplant recipients.

Cytomegalovirus and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Co-infection in Renal Transplants: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center.

There is a scarcity of data regarding the impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection complicating the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) course. The objective of the study was to explore the clinical profile and outcome of CMV co-infection with COVID-19. This is a single-center retrospective study of COVID-19 cases with concomitant CMV infection. A total of 18 cases were diagnosed with CMV infection during the study period May 2020 to December 2020. The median age (Interquartile range) of the study was 45 (53-38) years with predominant male sex (n = 14, 77%). The baseline donor-recipient status for CMV included D+/R+ (10, 55%), D-/R+(6, 33%), and D+/R- (2, 12%). COVID-19 severity in the study included mild (1, 7%), moderate (5, 28%), severe (8, 44%), and critical (4, 22%) cases. Criteria for hyperinflammatory state was met by 77% (n = 14) of cases. The most common therapeutic modality for COVID-19 given was remdesivir (n = 13), tocilizumab (n = 4), and convalescent plasma (n = 4). The median CMV titer at diagnosis was 1200 (1800-1000) copies/mL. The median duration of hospital stay was 12.5 (14-11). Mortality observed in the study was four (22%). The management of CMV co-infection with COVID-19 is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and we suggest screening for CMV infection in all posttransplant COVID-19 cases.

Expanding donor pool by utilizing deceased donors with snake envenoming.

In India, the deceased kidney transplant program is still in its preliminary stage, and accepting deceased donors with snakebite is just a forward step to expand the donor pool. We report here the outcome of 8 successful renal transplantations from brain-dead donors who died from a neurotoxic snakebite. We accepted them as donors as they had no evidence of hemotoxic snakebite. 7 recipients did well. 1 died due to sepsis with a functioning graft. 1 required renal biopsy that showed acute tubular necrosis. 1 required re-exploration due to graft collection due to a surgical issue. Patient and graft survival in follow-up were similar to other matched deceased donors in our center. According to our experience, utilizing brain-dead donors who died from a neurotoxic snakebite is safe and may dramatically expand the donor pool especially in countries where death due to snakebite is high in numbers.