Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants.

An understanding of how to counteract the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants is essential in the event of haemorrhage, emergency surgery and overdose. This review summarizes strategies for the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants, including the use of novel agents.

Desmopressin for treatment of platelet dysfunction and reversal of antiplatelet agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Essentials The optimal management of patients with platelet dysfunction undergoing surgery is unclear. This meta-analysis compared perioperative administration of desmopressin to placebo. Desmopressin reduced red cell transfusions, blood loss and risk of re-operation due to bleeding. There were too few events to determine if there was a change in the risk of thrombotic events. SUMMARY: Background Platelet dysfunction, including that caused by antiplatelet agents, increases the risk of perioperative bleeding. The optimal management of patients with platelet dysfunction undergoing surgery is unclear. Objectives To assess whether desmopressin reduces perioperative allogeneic red cell transfusion and bleeding in patients with platelet dysfunction. Patients/Methods We searched for randomized controlled trials in The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, the Transfusion Evidence Library and the ISI Web of Science to 7th July 2016. Data were pooled using mean difference (MD), relative risks or Peto odds ratios (pOR) using a random-effects model. Results Ten trials with 596 participants were identified, all in the setting of cardiac surgery. Platelet dysfunction was due to antiplatelet agents in six trials and cardiopulmonary bypass in four trials. Patients treated with desmopressin were transfused with fewer red cells (MD, -0.65 units; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], -1.16 to -0.13 units), lost less blood (MD, -253.93 mL; 95% CI, -408.01 to -99.85 mL) and had a lower risk of re-operation due to bleeding (pOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.84). The GRADE quality of evidence was very low to moderate, suggesting considerable uncertainty over the results Conclusions Desmopressin may be a useful agent to reduce bleeding and transfusion requirements for people with platelet dysfunction or with a history of recent antiplatelet drug administration undergoing cardiac surgery.

Modern-day management of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (AUGIH) is a common medical emergency and can present with life threatening haemorrhage. In the U.K., there are 70,000 hospital admissions per year. In the majority of cases, the aetiology is non-variceal in origin, but in other cases it is due to variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. It is also a leading indication for transfusion of blood components. This review explores recent randomised data on the efficacy and safety of red blood cell transfusion for AUGIH. In addition, the evidence base for use of other blood components and pro-haemostatic pharmacological agents is discussed, including acid suppression, antifibrinolytics and fibrinogen.

Intravenous immunoglobulin-induced haemolysis: a case report and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: To review the incidence and clinical features of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)-induced haemolysis. BACKGROUND: Haemolysis can be a severe complication of IVIg administration. It is due to the passive transfer of blood group antibodies and may result in significant anaemia and renal failure. METHODS: We report a case of severe IVIg-induced haemolysis; review the data reported to vigilance groups (The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, European Union Drug Regulatory Authorities, Food and Drug Administration and the Canada Vigilance Centre) between January 1998 and May 2012; and systematically review IVIg-induced haemolysis case reports (between January 1948 and January 2013). RESULTS: Nine hundred-twenty five cases of IVIg-induced haemolysis were identified from a review of cases reported to vigilance groups; 62 case reports were included in the systematic review. The majority of these were due to administration of doses of at least 2 g kg(-1) of IVIg (97%). IVIg-induced haemolysis was reported most commonly for patients with blood group A (65%) or AB (26%). One case report noted that in two patients with IVIg-induced haemolysis both received IVIg from the same batch. CONCLUSION: We make the following recommendations for the management of suspected cases of IVIg-induced haemolysis: Stop IVIg infusion and perform tests for haemolysis. Check titres of anti-blood group antibodies in IVIg. Provide supportive management for patient with fluid and/or red blood cell transfusions if necessary. Consider quarantine of the IVIg batch if found to be high titre for anti-A/B. Report reaction to regulatory/vigilance body.