Pain experienced by infants and toddlers at urine collection bag removal: A randomized, controlled, clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In pre-continent children, collection bags are frequently used as a first-line option to obtain a urine specimen. This practice, acknowledged by several guidelines for the step of UTI screening, is driven by a perception of the technique as being more convenient and less painful. However, our own experience led us to consider bag removal as a painful experience. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether the use of an oleo-calcareous liniment to aid bag removal reduced the acute pain expressed by young children. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single blind study was carried out in two emergency pediatrics departments. Pre-continent children aged 0-36 months admitted with an indication for urine testing were eligible for the study. Urine for dipstick test screening was obtained using a collection bag. At micturition, the patients were randomized into bag removal with (intervention group) or without (control group) liniment. Bag removal was recorded on video in such a manner as to permit independent assessments of pain by two evaluators blinded to group allocation. Pain was assessed using the FLACC scale. FINDINGS: 135 patients were analyzed: 70 in the intervention group and 65 in the control group. The median FLACC scores [interquartile range] for the intervention and control groups, respectively 4.0 [2.0-7.0] and 4.0 [3.0-7.0], did not differ significantly (p = 0.5). A FLACC score ≥4 was obtained for 56% of the patients and a score ≥7 for 28%. CONCLUSION: Removal of urine collection bags caused moderate to severe pain in half of the children included. The use of an oleo-calcareous liniment did not reduce this induced pain.

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate vs. double dose fluticasone propionate on lung function and asthma control in children.

There is a large body of data to support the use of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus a long-acting beta(2)-agonist vs. increasing the dose of ICS in adults, but less data in children. This double-blind, parallel group, non-inferiority study compared lung function and asthma control, based on Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines, in children receiving either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SFC) 50/100 microg bd (n = 160) or fluticasone propionate (FP) 200 microg bd (n = 161) for 12 wks. Change from baseline in mean morning peak expiratory flow increased following both treatments, but was significantly greater in the SFC group compared with FP [Adjusted mean change (s.e.) (l/min): SFC: 26.9 (2.13), FP: 19.3 (2.12); treatment difference: 7.6 (3.01); 95% CI: 1.7, 13.5; p = 0.012)]. Asthma control improved over time in both groups. Mean pre-bronchodilator maximal-expiratory flow at 50% vital capacity and percentage rescue-free days showed significantly greater improvements in the SFC group compared with FP. All other efficacy indices showed comparable improvements in each group. Treatment with SFC 50/100 microg bd compared with twice the steroid dose of FP (200 microg bd), was at least as effective in improving individual clinical outcomes and overall asthma control, in asthmatic children previously uncontrolled on low doses of ICS.

Maintaining asthma control in persistent asthma: comparison of three strategies in a 6-month double-blind randomised study.

UNLABELLED: In patients controlled with SFC250 Diskus bd, this double-blind, randomised 6-month study compared continuing SFC250 to stepping down to either SFC100 bd or FP250 bd. Six hundred and three patients previously using 1,000 microg BDP (or equivalent) daily +LABA and controlled according to investigator's judgement were recruited. Patients received SFC250 bd during an 8-week open run-in period. Four hundred and seventy six patients (mean age=43 years, mean FEV(1)=2.9+/-1.0) who fulfilled the randomisation criterion ('Well-controlled' asthma according to the GOAL weekly definition for the last 2 weeks of the run-in period) entered a 24-week treatment period. The statistical hypothesis was based on a non-inferiority of SFC100 or FP250 compared to SFC250. The main criterion was the change from baseline in morning PEF over weeks 1-12 in the per-protocol population. The non-inferiority limit was -15 L/min. At inclusion, the three treatment groups were well balanced. Mean morning PEF was 476, 470 and 465 L/min in the SFC250, SFC100 and FP250 groups, respectively. The adjusted mean change in morning PEF over weeks 1-12 was +1.76+/-2.43 L/min for SFC250, -3.07+/-2.32 L/min for SFC100 and -16.51+/-2.46 L/min for FP250. SFC100 was at least as effective as SFC250 (treatment difference -4.83 [-12.39; 2.72], p=0.151) whereas FP250 was not (treatment difference -18.27 [-26.05; -10.49], p<0.001). Similar results were observed over weeks 13-24 in morning PEF (SFC100-SFC250=-4.54+/-3.84, p=0.238; FP250-SFC250=-20.11+/-3.92, p<0.0001). Secondary endpoints showed a similar pattern. Over weeks 1-12, SFC250 was significantly more effective than FP250 on evening PEF, daily symptoms and bronchodilator use. There was no difference between SFC100 and SFC250. The mean annual rate of moderate exacerbations was 0.16 in both SFC 250 and SFC 100 groups, and 0.21 in FP 250 group (ns, Poisson analysis). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In patients achieving asthma control with SFC250, stepping treatment down with SFC100 was at least as effective on lung function and symptoms as continuing SFC250, whereas FP250 was not.

Long-term safety of fluticasone propionate and nedocromil sodium on bone in children with asthma.

OBJECTIVE: Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy for pediatric asthma. However, few controlled long-term studies have investigated their effect on bone mineral density (BMD) and growth. METHODS: Children who were aged 6 to 14 years and had persistent asthma were randomized to 24 months' treatment with fluticasone propionate (FP) 200 micro g/d or nedocromil sodium (NS) 8 mg/d (if uncontrolled, maximum doses of 400 micro g/d and 16 mg/d, respectively). BMD was assessed blind and analyzed at a central facility on the basis of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements of the lumbar spine and femoral neck at months 0, 6, 12, and 24. Height was measured at months 0, 12, and 24. Efficacy parameters (lung function, asthma control, occurrence of exacerbations) were measured every 3 months. RESULTS: In total, 174 children were randomized to treatment (87 received FP, and 87 received NS). At month 24, the adjusted mean percentage increase in lumbar spine BMD was 11.6% in the FP group compared with 10.4% in NS-treated children (95% confidence interval for treatment difference: -0.7% to 3.1%). The corresponding increases in femoral neck BMD were 8.9% and 8.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference in growth between the 2 groups: adjusted mean growth rates were 6.1 cm/y with FP and 5.8 cm/y with NS. FP was significantly superior for every efficacy parameter investigated and was similarly well tolerated as NS. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term effects of FP and NS on BMD accrual and growth are similar among children with asthma. The benefit:risk ratio of FP may be considered superior to that of NS.