Risk factors, management, and outcomes in isolated parafalcine or tentorial subdural hematomas.

INTRODUCTION: Indications for hospitalization in patients with parafalcine or tentorial subdural hematomas (SDH) remain unclear. This study derived and validated a clinical decision rule to identify patients at low risk for complications such that hospitalization can be avoided. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective medical record review of adult patients with parafalcine or tentorial SDHs was completed. The primary outcome was significant injury, defined as injury that led to neurosurgery, discharge to another facility, or death. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify variables independently associated with the outcome in the derivation cohort. These variables were then validated on a separate cohort from a different institution abstracted without knowledge of the identified variables. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, 134 patients with parafalcine/tentorial SDHs were identified. The mean age was 63 ± 19 years with 82 (61%) male. Seventy-one (53%) had significant injuries. Variables independently associated with significant injury included: age over 60, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.46 (95% CI 1.24, 9.62), initial Glasgow Coma Scale score below 15, aOR =7.92 (95% CI 2.78, 22.5), and additional traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) on computerized tomography (CT), aOR =5.97 (95% CI 2.48, 14.4). These three variables had a sensitivity of 71/71 (100%, 95% CI 96, 100%) and specificity of 12/63 (19%, 95% CI 10, 31%). The validation cohort (n = 83) had a mean age of 62 ± 22 years with 50 (60%) male. The three variables had a sensitivity of 36/36 (100%, 95% CI 92, 100%) and specificity of 7/47 (15%, 95% CI 6.2, 28%). All 39 (100%, 95% CI 93, 100%) patients from both cohorts who underwent neurosurgery had additional TBI findings on their CT scan. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with parafalcine/tentorial SDHs who are under 60 years with initial GCS scores of 15 and no addition TBIs on CT are at low risk and may not need hospitalization. Furthermore, patients with isolated parafalcine/tentorial SDHs are unlikely to undergo neurosurgery. Prospective, external validation with a larger sample size is now recommended. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

TRIAD XI: Utilizing simulation to evaluate the living will and POLST ability to achieve goal concordant care when critically ill or at end-of-life-The Realistic Interpretation of Advance Directives.

OBJECTIVE: Utilize simulation to evaluate if living wills (LW) or POLST achieves goal concordant Care (GCC) in a medical crisis. METHODS: Nurses and resident-physicians from a single center were randomized to a clinical scenario with a living will (LW), physician orders for life sustaining treatment (POLST) or no document. Primary outcomes were resuscitation decision and time to decision. Secondary outcome was the effect of education. RESULTS: Total enrollment was 57 and less than 30% received prior training. Types of directives were linked to resuscitation decisions (P = .019). Participants randomized to "No Document" or POLST specifying "CPR" performed resuscitation. If a terminal condition presented with a POLST/ do not resuscitate-comfort measures only (DNR-CMO), 73% resuscitated. The LW or POLST specifying DNR combined with medical support resulted in resuscitations in 29% or more of the scenarios. Documents did not significantly affect median time-to-decision (P = .402) but decisions for "No Document" and POLST/CPR were at least 10 s less than other scenarios. Scenarios involving POLST DNR/Limited Treatment had the highest median time of 43 s. Prior training in LWs and POLST exerted a 10% improvement in decision making (P = .537). CONCLUSION: GCC was not always achieved with a LW or POLST. This conclusion supports prior research identifying problems with the interpretation and discordance with LW's and POLST.