Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Periodontol ; 32(4): 390-400, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15811057

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouth rinse/spray can still be considered the gold standard in the chemical prevention of plaque formation and development of gingivitis. The product unfortunately has some side effects, such as extrinsic tooth staining, poor taste, taste disturbance, sensitivity changes in tongue, pain and irritation because of the alcohol content. These side effects led to the search of new formulations. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, long-term, parallel study, 48 moderate periodontitis patients rinsed for 6 months (starting immediately after a "one-stage, full-mouth" disinfection) with one of the following products: CHX 0.2%+alcohol (Corsodyl), CHX 0.05%+ cetyl pyridinium chloride (CPC) 0.05% and no alcohol (Perio-Aid Maintenance, a new formulation), or the placebo of the latter. After 1, 3 and 6 months a series of clinical and microbiological parameters were recorded for the supra- and subgingival area as well as for saliva. RESULTS: Although there was a significant treatment impact (mechanical debridement) in all groups, both CHX solutions further decreased both plaque and gingivitis indices (p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively), when compared with placebo. This was also reflected by additional reductions in the number of CFU/ml of aerobic and especially anaerobic species and by a suppression of Streptococcus mutans (versus an overgrowth for the placebo), in all niches. Differences between both CHX solutions were never encountered. The subjective ratings were slightly in favour of the new CHX-CPC formulation when compared with the other CHX-alcohol formulation, especially for taste of the product (p<0.05), but less impressive for the staining of teeth and tongue. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated the potential of a new CHX 0.05%+CPC 0.05% non-alcoholic formulation as an effective antiplaque agent for long-term use with reduced subjective side effects.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/administration & dosage , Cetylpyridinium/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Dental Prophylaxis/methods , Mouthwashes/administration & dosage , Periodontitis/prevention & control , Bacteria, Anaerobic/drug effects , Cetylpyridinium/adverse effects , Chlorhexidine/adverse effects , Dental Plaque/prevention & control , Dental Plaque Index , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Periodontal Index , Taste , Tooth Discoloration/chemically induced
2.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 13(6): 617-22, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12519336

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of endogenous and local factors on the occurrence of implant failure up to the abutment stage. The study comprised a group of 399 consecutive patients, which represented the total of patients who had been treated from 1995 to 1997 (with a total of 1263 Brånemark Brån-system implants) at the Department of Periodontology of the University Hospital, Catholic University Leuven. For each patient, the medical history was carefully examined. Data collection and analysis were mainly focused on endogenous factors such as hypertension, osteoporosis, hypo- or hyperthyroid function, chemotherapy, diabetes type I or II, Crohn's disease, some local factors (e.g. bone quality, reason for tooth loss) and breach of sterility during surgery. The reason for tooth loss, smoking habits, radiotherapy and other local bone factors (bone quality and quantity) were also recorded. Implant failures were recorded up to the abutment connection. The present study indicated a success rate until this stage of 97.8%. General factors such as heavy smoking, chemotherapy plus poor bone quality increased implant failure rate. Radiotherapy, limited bone volume and claustrophobia, which led to breaching the strict preoperative rules of asepsis, appeared to be the most relevant local factors for early implant failures.


Subject(s)
Dental Abutments , Dental Implants , Dental Restoration Failure , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density/physiology , Bone Resorption/complications , Chi-Square Distribution , Crohn Disease/complications , Dental Prosthesis Design , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Female , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hyperthyroidism/complications , Hypothyroidism/complications , Jaw Diseases/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/complications , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Smoking/adverse effects , Statistics as Topic , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...