[The indoor sport: is it a risk factor for allergic rhinitis?]. / La pratique sportive en salle serait-elle un facteur de risque de rhinite allergique ?

INTRODUCTION: The high prevalence of allergic rhinitis that occurs in elite athletes has been extensively investigated. However, data among recreational athletes practicing indoor activities remain contradictory. The aim of the present study was to determine whether taking part in gym based sporting activities constitutes a risk factor for allergic rhinitis in recreational athletes. METHODS: A group of 50 recreational athletes was examined. A specific questionnaire for the screening of allergic rhinitis and a battery of skin prick-tests to aeroallergens were administered to each participant. Measurements of nasal symptoms, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and lung function were also obtained before and after a training session. RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of the participants were atopic, 18% suffered from allergic rhinitis. This prevalence is similar to that of the general population (16.9%). After exercise, nasal symptom prevalence did not change significantly. However, an improvement in nasal inspiratory flow was observed in 70% of the participants. No statistically significant change in lung function was noticed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that the occasional practice of sport in the gyms does not constitute a risk factor for atopy or allergic rhinitis. However, this kind of activity induces an increase in the nasal patency of both the healthy and the rhinitic subjects.

[Inhalation therapy: provocation tests, infectious risks, acute bronchiolitis and ENT diseases. GAT aerosolstorming, Paris 2011]. / Aérosolthérapie: tests de provocation, risques infectieux, bronchiolites et pathologie ORL. Aérosolstorming du GAT, Paris 2011.

Communications from the 2011 meeting of the GAT are reported in this second article on the practical management of bronchial provocation tests and infectious risks associated with the use of nebulization. Recent advances on the role of nebulized hypertonic saline in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis in infants and of the nebulization in sinusal diseases are also reported.

North African reference equation for peak nasal inspiratory flow.

AIM: To assess, in healthy North African subjects, the applicability and reliability of a previously published reference equation and normal values for peak nasal inspiratory flow, and to calculate a peak nasal inspiratory flow reference equation in this population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Anthropometric data were recorded in 212 volunteers (100 females and 112 males) aged 13-27 years. Peak nasal inspiratory flow was measured several times. Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine the reference equation. RESULTS: The previously published reference equation and normal values did not reliably predict peak nasal inspiratory flow in the study population. In our subjects, the reference equation (r2 = 30 per cent) for peak nasal inspiratory flow (l/min) was 1.4256 × height (m) + 33.0215 × gender (where 0 = female, 1 = male) + 1.4117 × age (years) - 136.6778. The lower limit of normal was calculated by subtracting from the peak nasal inspiratory flow reference value (84 l/min). CONCLUSION: This is the first published study to calculate a reference equation for peak nasal inspiratory flow in North African subjects. This equation enables objective evaluation of nasal airway patency in patients of North African origin.

[A survey of nebulization practices in France conducted in 2004 by the GAT]. / NUAGES: une enquête sur la pratique de la nébulisation en France.

METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 50 000 general practicioners (GP) and specialists. RESULTS: 4,898 physicians (9.4%) responded, including 59.1% GP, 16.9% pneumologists, 13% pediatricians and about 10% other specialists, ENT, allergologists, and intensivists. The main reason for pneumologists to prescribe nebulization was the efficiency on long term of approved drugs. GP prescribe nebulization for its local effects, using unapproved drugs, on short periods of time, especially in COPD, asthma, bronchitis and tracheitis/laryningitis. Although pneumologists have been trained during their fellowship and do not ask for further education, MG have learned by their own experience and are asking for further education. CONCLUSION: This study should help to develop teaching programs on nebulization with the aim to optimize its practice.

[Aerosol: present and future]. / Aérosols: présent et futur.

INTRODUCTION: Aerosols, these particles considered initially like "magic", are slowly delivering their secrets. STATE OF ART: For several years studies on the subject have increased and companies have maximised their efforts to improve the technology for transforming drugs into the optimal aerosol. Recently new systems have appeared on the market. Mesh nebulisers can reduce the inhalation time, metered dose inhalers have modified their formulations to improve the efficiency of drug deposition and dry powder inhalers require lower inspiratory flows. PERSPECTIVES/CONCLUSIONS: In the near future new systems using technologies of greater or lesser sophistication should appear on the market.

N.U.A.G.E.S: a survey of nebulisation practice in France with regard to ERS guidelines.

UNLABELLED: A survey of nebulisation practice in France was conducted under the aegis of the French respiratory society in 2004. METHODS: Analysis of a questionnaire was obtained from 3674 physicians. RESULTS: A total of 2439 physicians were general practitioners (GPs), 698 were chest physicians, and 537 paediatricians. The main reasons to use nebulisation are (1) for chest physicians efficacy in treating various pathologies with long-term administration (1 wk to 1 month) of approved drugs, and (2) for GP's local action properties. While chest physicians learned about nebulisation during their university training and do not ask for additional information, GPs learned by practical experience or from colleagues and ask for further information. CONCLUSION: This study will help to develop targeted educational programmes on nebulisation practice.

[Prospective evaluation of the method of measurement of the peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) in allergic rhinitis. Observational study "Pratic in ORL"]. / Evaluation prospective de la méthode de mesure du flux inspiratoire nasal par le PNIF dans la rhinite allergique. Résultats de l'observatoire "Pratic en ORL".

OBJECTIVES: To establish the ENT specialists's interest for the nasal obstruction measurement by the Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) for the primary care medical management of patients with allergic rhinitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A nation wide mail survey was conducted on the whole set of 2,800 French ENT specialists. Physicians had to use the PNIF in 4-consecutive patients with allergic rhinitis and assess through a questionnaire their interest for this tool. RESULTS: About 8% of all ENTs (n = 228) responded. 65.3% of them had used the PNIF with their 4 patients, 29.7% used it in only 1 to 3 of their patients, and 5% did not use it at all. The PNIF was mainly used in moderate to severe rhinitis (94%) in contrast with mild rhinitis (32%) and in persistent rhinitis (94.2%) compared to intermittent rhinitis (54.8%). The primary motivation to use the PNIF on a systematic basis was to quantitatively assess nasal obstruction and to obtain an objective measurement of nasal obstruction. Conversely, the reasons for not using the PNIF were the needless of an objective measurement of nasal obstruction, the drawback of the PNIF in the patient physician relationship and lack of patient's acceptance of the device. Most physicians considered training for a correct usage of the PNIF was easy. Finally, about 2 thirds of the sample gave a positive rating on the usefulness of the PNIF for their patients. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the interest of the practitioners to dispose of a simple and reliable tool for the follow up of nasal obstruction in allergic rhinitis.

[Dry powder inhalers in extreme clinical situations]. / Les poudres sèches dans les situations cliniques extrêmes.

INTRODUCTION: Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) require a certain threshold of inspiratory effort to generate respirable particles. We undertook a literature review to determine whether this may, in particular clinical settings (young children, elderly subjects, acute or chronic respiratory obstructive syndromes - asthma and COPD), constitute a limitation on their use. STATE OF THE ART: Currently marketed DPIs exhibit different technical characteristics. Many factors may influence their efficacy, so that the predictive utility of in vitro tests is limited. Published clinical studies indicate that aerosol therapies inhaled with DPIs show clinical efficacy even at low inspiratory air flows in adults and children with acute asthma, in acute bronchoconstriction experimentally provoked by methacholine or histamine, in acute asthma attacks in adults and children, and in COPD-related airway obstruction. The efficacy of DPIs appears comparable to that of p-MDIs or nebulisation. However, the studies often have some limitations (including limited statistical power and patient selection) that may affect their value. PERSPECTIVES: The published studies analysed suggest that DPIs may be used in the great majority of clinical situations, subject to careful patient education. Nevertheless, p-MDIs with spacers remain recommended by international guidelines for children under the age of 6. CONCLUSIONS: Additional well-designed clinical studies remain desirable to establish firmly the efficacy of DPIs in these situations.

A history of nebulization.

The simplest and most natural route of drug delivery to the lungs is the inhaled one. From the historical and medical point of view, it was a Greek, Pedanus Discorides, the father of the science of pharmacy, who, during the first century prescribed inhaled fumigation. Pipes were also used to inhale hallucinogenic substances. All shamans knew the psychotropic effects of poisonous plants such as Datura stramonium, especially Red Indians, in their peace calumets; but Indians of Madras used fumigations of Datura ferox to treat asthma. Since 1803, this therapeutic was imported in Great Britain and cigarettes with leaves of datura were used by asthmatics until 1992. In the middle of the nineteenth century, to treat grapevines diseases and in response to the fashion of inhaling thermal waters, spray technology was developed for the effervescent waters at the thermal spas. The onslaught of tuberculosis, similar to AIDS a century later, brought back into practice the inefficacious use of antiseptic aerosol therapy. With the discovery of adrenaline, ephedrine aerosols enjoyed a rebirth. The perfecting of jet nebulizers by R. Tiffeneau, father of FEV1 and M.B. Wright, father of peak-flow, allowed a better practice of inhalotherapy. In 1949, the United States, ultrasonic nebulizers made their first appearance in the form of humidifiers, but doctors were quick to add medications to produce therapeutic aerosols. After 150 years, with the improvement of nebulizer systems and new nebulized medications, the nebulization story is still not concluded.

[Specific bronchial provocation test with solid aerosols. Quantification of results]. / Test de provocation bronchique spécifique avec aérosols solides. Quantification des résultats.

OBJECTIVES: To determine 1) the level of specific bronchial reactivity by challenge with flour and 2) the criteria of positivity using a new method for the expression of the results. METHOD: Thirty-eight asthmatic subjects, occupationally exposed to wheat flour, performed a challenge with lactose then with flour. The instantaneous measurement of the concentration and of the inspiratory airflow were used to calculate the inhaled dose and to establish the dose-response relationships. The results were given 1) by the dose of flour provoking a 20% fall in FEV1 (PDf20), 2) by the comparison of the variation of the FEV1 during the challenge with flour to the distribution of the values observed during the challenge with lactose (inferior limit of the confidence interval at 99.7%). RESULTS: The variations of the FEV1 were not significantly related to the inhaled dose of lactose. The specific bronchial reactivity to flour was a continuous data and three groups were distinguished: 1) subjects (n = 15) with high bronchial reactivity had a fall of FEV1 of more than 20% 2) subjects (n = 13) without significant variation of the FEV1 for doses higher than 1,400 micrograms by comparison to the distribution of the values of the lactose test 3) subjects (n = 10) with a significant fall of FEV1 by comparison to the distribution of the values of the lactose test but lower than 20%. For this group with moderate reactivity, the flow of the inhaled dose may be determinant for the bronchial response. CONCLUSIONS: PDf 20 measures the specific bronchial reactivity. However, if the fall in FEV1 is lower than 20%, the specific challenge with flour may be compared to the challenge with lactose to detect the subjects with moderate reactivity. Our results confirmed the role of the inhaled dose and suggested the role of the dose rate in the outset of bronchial obstruction among asthmatic subjects.

Computerized equipment for the delivery of inhaled doses of solid particles in specific bronchial challenge.

An apparatus to generate solid particles was tested for use in diagnosing occupational asthma. This equipment measures the inhaled dose of dry particles during specific inhalation challenge. It includes an aerosol generator, a cyclone type particle size selector, and an inhalation chamber to which a patient breathing at tidal volume can be connected for the test. It is fully controlled by a standard personal computer in automatic mode, acting on the flow rate and the aerosol generator to maintain the concentration at a fixed value, usually 3 mg/m3. The dose of aerosol delivered to the patient was calculated from the aerosol concentration, and the inhaled volume was calculated by integration of the corresponding signals. The coefficient of variation for this measurement was estimated to be 12%. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of aerosol inside the inhalation chamber was measured for three substances: lactose, wheat flour, and buckwheat flour. The MMAD of the aerosol inside the chamber was also estimated from the particle size distribution of the raw powder. The relative difference between the measured MMAD and the calculated value was less than 15%. The corresponding relative difference between the measured geometrical SD and the calculated value was found to be less than 26%.

The effect of zafirlukast on repetitive exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: the possible role of leukotrienes in exercise-induced refractoriness.

BACKGROUND: Single doses of zafirlukast attenuate exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), but previous studies have not measured zafirlukast's effects after regular dosing or its duration of effect beyond 4 hours. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of zafirlukast 20 mg and 80 mg twice daily compared with placebo on exercise challenges performed at 2 and 8 hours after the last dose of regular administration. METHODS: Twenty-four adult patients with stable asthma taking beta(2)-agonists, inhaled corticosteroids, or both received treatment with zafirlukast (20 mg and 80 mg) and placebo. The patients were treated twice daily for 14 days in a randomized, double-blind, 3-way cross-over fashion, with a 7-day washout period between each treatment. Exercise challenges were performed at 2 and 8 hours after the morning dose on day 14. FEV(1) was measured before exercise and at set intervals after exercise until it returned to within 7% of its baseline value. RESULTS: Both zafirlukast treatments significantly reduced EIB, as measured by the area under the FEV(1) time curve after the 2-hour (P <.001) and 8-hour (P <.001) exercise challenges and maximum fall in FEV(1) at the 2-hour challenge (P <.001). The comparison at 8 hours between treatments was affected by the unexpected finding that EIB was less in the placebo group after the 8-hour challenge than after the 2-hour challenge, as measured by the within-group change in the maximum fall in FEV(1) (P <.001) and the area under the FEV(1) time curve (P =.0023). CONCLUSION: Regular zafirlukast treatment protects against EIB for at least 8 hours after regular dosing. A refractory period, which may be caused by exercise-induced leukotriene release, may last for up to 6 hours after the initial response to exercise.

Quantification of the dose of inhaled flour: relation with nonspecific bronchial and immunological reactivities.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between specific bronchial reactivity and respective nonspecific bronchial and immunological reactivities. Twenty-one patients underwent bronchial challenges with lactose and flour. The aerosol of particles was generated by a computer-controlled aerosolizer. Specific bronchial challenge results were expressed as the provocative dose of flour (PDf) that caused a 20% or 15% decrease in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). For each subject, the decrease in FEV1 observed during the challenge with flour was compared with the calculated lower limit of the 99.7% confidence interval for the lactose challenge. The subjects also underwent a nonspecific challenge with methacholine and a measurement of the specific immunoglobulin E against wheat. The inhalation of lactose did not significantly affect FEV1. Nine subjects had high reactivity to wheat flour with a PDf20 <400 microg. Five subjects had intermediate reactivity: FEV1 fell by <20% but by significantly more than that in the test with lactose. For 7 subjects, there was no significant change in FEVI for inhaled doses of flour over 1390 microg. The results for specific bronchial challenge were significantly correlated with those for the methacholine test (p<0.02). Positive skin tests and specific immunoglobulin E against wheat were observed more frequently in the high reactivity group. Specific bronchial challenge can be performed safely to establish precise dose-response curves. The provocative dose of flour causing a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in one second is useful for evaluating the degree of specific reactivity but is not suitable in cases of intermediate reactivity in which comparison with the lactose test is necessary. Specific reactivity is probably a function of immunological and nonspecific bronchial reactivities.

Increased nitric oxide in exhaled air in patients with systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the lung production of nitric oxide (NO) in patients with systemic sclerosis. METHODS: The NO concentration and its rate of production by the lungs were measured in the exhaled air in 14 patients with systemic sclerosis and in 12 healthy control subjects using the chemiluminescent method. RESULTS: The NO concentration and its rate of production were significantly increased in scleroderma patients (mean +/- SEM, 18.7 +/- 1.7 ppb and 5.8 +/- 0.5 nmol/min, respectively), as compared with control subjects (11.2 +/- 0.8 ppb and 4.3 +/- 0.4 nmol/min, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: The pulmonary production of NO is increased in scleroderma patients, which might reflect and contribute to the inflammatory processes of the lungs in systemic sclerosis.

Blood gas measurement during exercise: a comparative study between arterialized earlobe sampling and direct arterial puncture in adults.

Sampling arterialized earlobe blood is thought to be easier and less painful than direct arterial puncture, and to allow measurement of blood gas values during exercise without the need to insert an arterial cannula. However, arterialized earlobe oxygen tension (PO2) often underestimates arterial PO2 at rest, and is not fully validated during exercise. We have therefore conducted a prospective study to compare values of PO2 and carbon dioxide tension (PCO2) and the discomfort experienced by adult subjects undergoing the two methods of blood sampling during exercise. Seventy consecutive adult patients were studied. Blood samples were drawn simultaneously from the radial artery and arterialized earlobe of each patient during the last minute of an 8 min exercise. Values of PO2 and PCO2 were measured by means of blood gas electrodes. The correlation coefficients between the two samples were 0.92 for PO2 and 0.91 for PCO2. However, the bias and the limits of agreement between the two methods were wide for PO2 (mean+/-2SD of the differences between the two methods: 0.63+/-1.50 kPa (4.7+/-11.2 mmHg)). The bias and the limits of agreement were smaller for PCO2. Patients felt that the earlobe method was not associated with less discomfort than radial artery puncture. We conclude that arterialized earlobe blood oxygen tension is not a good substitute for arterial oxygen tension during exercise, and should not be used to assess arterial oxygen tension in adults during exercise.

[Nebulization: principles and generating process]. / Nébulisation: principes et générateurs.

After a brief historical background, principles of nebulization are reviewed, i.e., factors at the origin of particle sedimentation, the procedure advantages and the importance of the particle size. Inhaled particles reach alveolar bronchioli via three mechanisms: impaction, sedimentation and diffusion. There are two different types of nebulizers: pneumatic and ultrasonic. To optimize its benefits nebulization should consist of a slow and deep inspiration followed by a pause in order to improve particle sedimentation. Nebulization should always be associated with kinesitherapy.