Blood pressure variability assessed by office, home, and ambulatory measurements before and during antihypertensive drug treatment: a sub-analysis of the REVERENT randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) can be assessed using office (OBP), home (HBP), or ambulatory BP (ABP) measurements. This analysis investigated the association and agreement between OBP, HBP, and ABP measurements for BPV assessment at baseline and 10 weeks after initiating antihypertensive drug therapy. METHODS: Untreated hypertensive patients with elevated BPV were randomized to receive an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ramipril) or a calcium channel blocker (nifedipine GITS) in a 10-week, open-label, blinded-end point study. BPV was assessed using standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) (reading-to-reading analyses). RESULTS: Data from 146 participants from three research centers (Athens/Greece; Milan/Italy; Shanghai/China) were analyzed [mean age 53 ±â€Š10 (SD) years, male individuals 60%, baseline systolic OBP, HBP, and 24 h ABP 144 ±â€Š9, 138 ±â€Š10, and 143 ±â€Š10 mmHg, respectively]. Post-treatment minus pre-treatment systolic CV difference was: OBP: 0.3%, P = 0.28; HBP: -0.2%, P = 0.20; 24 h ABP: 1.1%, P < 0.001. Home and ambulatory (not office) BPV indices presented weak-to-moderate correlation, both before and during treatment (range of coefficients 0.04-0.33). The correlation coefficient between systolic HBP CV and awake ABP CV was 0.21 and 0.28 before and during treatment, respectively (P < 0.05/< 0.001, respectively). Home and ambulatory (not office) BPV indices presented slight to fair agreement (range 64-73%) in detecting participants with high systolic BPV (top quartile of respective distributions) both before and during treatment (kappa range 0.04-0.27). CONCLUSION: These data showed a weak-to-moderate association between out-of-office (but not office) BPV indices both before and during BP-lowering treatment, with reasonable agreement in detecting individuals with high BPV. Out-of-office BP measurements provide more similar and consistent BPV information than office measurements.

Seasonal effects on blood pressure variability in treated hypertensive patients assessed by office, home, and ambulatory measurements.

This study investigated the seasonal effect on blood pressure (BP) variability. Patients on stable antihypertensive drug treatment were assessed with office (OBP), home (HBP), and ambulatory BP (ABP) measurements in winter, next summer, and in next winter. Fifty-eight participants with full data for winter and summer were analyzed (mean age 65.2 ± 7.9 [SD], 64% males). OBP, HBP and ABP (24-h; daytime) were lower in summer than in winter (P < 0.01), whereas nighttime ABP was unchanged (p = NS). Standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV) and average real variability (ARV) for systolic OBP were higher in winter than summer (p < 0.01/ < 0.05/ < 0.01, respectively). These indices for HBP and ABP measurements did not differ in winter and summer (p = NS). Forty participants had complete data for winter-summer-next winter and HBP/ABP variability indices did not differ for both winters versus summer. These preliminary data suggest that BP variability is unaffected by seasonal changes in contrast to average BP levels.

The value of myocardial strain imaging in the evaluation of patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: a review of the literature.

Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) is considered to be the most common, complex, cyanotic congenital heart disease (CHD) representing 7-10% of all congenital heart defects, whereas the patients with ToF are the most frequently operated in their early infancy or childhood. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) consists a valuable imaging technique for the diagnosis and serial follow-up of CHD patients. Furthermore, in recent years, advanced echocardiography imaging techniques have come to the fore, aiming to achieve a complete and more accurate evaluation of cardiac function using speckle tracking imaging modalities. We conducted a review of the literature in order to assess the myocardial deformation of patients with repaired ToF (rToF) using echocardiographic and CMR parameters. Patients with rToF have impaired myocardial strain parameters, that are well standardized either with the use of speckle tracking echocardiography or with the use of CMR imaging. Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction (low GLS) and myocardial dyssynchrony are commonly identified in rToF patients. Impaired left atrium (LA) and right atrium (RA) mechanics are, also, a common finding in this study population, but the studies using atrial strain are a lot fewer than those with LV and RV strain. No studies using myocardial work were identified in the literature, as far as rToF patients are concerned, which makes it an ideal field for further investigation.

Blood pressure variability assessed by office, home, and ambulatory measurements: comparison, agreement, and determinants.

The present study compared the blood pressure variability (BPV) among office (OBP), home (HBP), and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measurements and assessed their determinants, as well as their agreement in identifying individuals with high BPV. Individuals attending a hypertension clinic had OBP measurements (2-3 visits) and underwent HBP monitoring (3-7 days, duplicate morning and evening measurements) and ABP monitoring (24 h, 20-min intervals). BPV was quantified using the standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and variability independent of the mean (VIM) using all BP readings obtained by each method. A total of 626 participants were analyzed (age 52.8 ± 12.0 years, 57.7% males, 33.1% treated). Systolic BPV was usually higher than diastolic BPV, and out-of-office BPV was higher than office BPV, with ambulatory BPV giving the highest values. BPV was higher in women than men, yet it was not different between untreated and treated individuals. Associations among BPV indices assessed using different measurement methods were weak (r 0.1-0.3) but were stronger between out-of-office BPV indices. The agreement between methods in detecting individuals with high BPV was low (30-40%) but was higher between out-of-office BPV indices. Older age was an independent determinant of increased OBP variability. Older age, female sex, smoking, and overweight/obesity were determinants of increased out-of-office BPV. These data suggest that BPV differs with different BP measurement methods, reflecting different pathophysiological phenomena, whereas the selection of the BPV index is less important. Office and out-of-office BP measurements appear to be complementary methods in assessing BPV.

Automated blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: validation process modification and evaluation of a novel professional device which detects atrial fibrillation and adapts its blood pressure measurement algorithm.

OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure (BP) measurement in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients is problematic and automated monitors are regarded as inaccurate. The optimal procedure for validating BP monitors in AF is questionable. This study evaluated the accuracy of a novel professional oscillometric upper-arm cuff device (Microlife WatchBP Office), which has an algorithm for detecting AF and then applies an AF-specific BP measurement algorithm. BP variability, which is inherently increased in AF patients, was considered in the analysis. METHODS: Subjects with sustained AF were included in a validation study using the same arm sequential measurement method of the Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) for special populations. Analysis was performed in all subjects and separately in those with and without high reference BP variability (>12/8 mmHg SBP/DBP). RESULTS: Thirty-five subjects with 105 paired test/reference BP measurements were included (mean age 76.3 ±â€Š8.4 years, reference SBP/DBP 128.2 ±â€Š19.5/72.5 ±â€Š12.1 mmHg, pulse rate 68.3 ±â€Š14.9 bpm). Validation Criterion 1 (mean difference ±â€ŠSD) was 0.0 ±â€Š7.7/0.2 ±â€Š7.0 mmHg in all 105 BP pairs (threshold ≤5 ±â€Š8 mmHg). Criterion 1 was 0.5 ±â€Š6.1/-0.2 ±â€Š6.8 mmHg in 18 subjects (54 BP pairs) with low reference BP variability and -0.6 ±â€Š9.2/0.6 ±â€Š7.3 mmHg in 17 (51 pairs) with high variability. Criterion 1 did not differ in pulse rate < 70 vs. ≥ 70 bpm Validation Criterion 2 (SD of differences for 35 individuals) was 5.38/6.20 mmHg (SBP/DBP; threshold ≤6.95/6.95). CONCLUSION: A technology which detects AF and activates an AF-specific BP measurement algorithm introduces a challenging solution for clinical practice. Validation of BP monitors in AF patients should not ignore their inherently high BP variability.

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory central blood pressure in adolescents and young adults: association with peripheral blood pressure and preclinical organ damage.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship of 24-h ambulatory central blood pressure (ABP) with preclinical organ damage in youth. METHODS: Individuals aged 10-25 years referred for suspected hypertension and healthy volunteers had simultaneous 24-h peripheral and central ABP monitoring (Mobil-O-Graph 24 h PWA). Central BP was calculated using two different calibration methods (c1 using oscillometric systolic/diastolic ABP; c2 using mean arterial/diastolic ABP). Their association with preclinical organ damage [left ventricular mass index (LVMI), carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), 24-h pulse wave velocity (PWV)] was investigated. RESULTS: A total of 136 participants were analyzed (age 17.9 ±â€Š4.7 years, 54% adolescents, 77% males, 34% with elevated ABP). Twenty-four-hour peripheral systolic ABP (pSBP) was higher than c1 systolic ABP (c1SBP) by 14.1 ±â€Š3.7 mmHg, but lower than c2SBP by 6.5 ±â€Š7.6 mmHg (all P < 0.01). c2SBP quartiles provided better stratification of preclinical organ damage than pSBP. Both c1SBP/c2SBP were significantly associated with LVMI (r = 0.35/0.33) and IMT (r = 0.23/0.42; all P < 0.01; primary endpoint). These associations were stronger for c2SBP compared with those of pSBP in adolescents but not in adults. PWV was more closely associated with pSBP than c2SBP (r = 0.94/0.83, P < 0.01). LVMI variation was best determined by c2SBP in adolescents and pSBP in adults; IMT by c2SBP and PWV by pSBP in both subgroups. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that in young individuals, the calibration method for 24-h central ABP plays a major role in determining its association with preclinical organ damage. In adolescents, 24-h central ABP appears to be more strongly associated with early cardiac and carotid damage than peripheral BP.

Home and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children, adolescents and young adults: comparison, diagnostic agreement and association with preclinical organ damage.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the association of home (HBP), ambulatory (ABP) and office blood pressure (OBP) measurements with preclinical organ damage in young individuals. METHODS: Individuals referred for elevated blood pressure and healthy volunteers aged 6-25 years were evaluated with OBP (2-3 visits), 7-day HBP and 24-h ABP monitoring. Organ damage was assessed by echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI), carotid ultrasonography [intima--media thickness (IMT)] and pulse wave velocity (PWV) using piezo-electronic or oscillometric technique. RESULTS: Analysis included 251 individuals (mean age 14 ±â€Š3.9 years, 70.9% men: 31.1% children, 54.6% adolescents, 14.3% young adults) of whom 189 had LVMI, 123 IMT and 198 PWV measurements. Office, ambulatory and home hypertension was diagnosed in 29.5, 27.1 and 26.3% of participants. The agreement of OBP with ABP was 74.5% (kappa 0.37) and HBP 76.1% (kappa 0.41), with closer agreement between HBP and ABP (84.9%, kappa 0.61). LVMI gave comparable correlations with systolic OBP, 24-h ABP and HBP (r = 0.31/0.31/0.30, all P < 0.01). The same was the case for IMT (0.33/0.32/0.37, all P < 0.01) and piezo-electronic PWV (0.55/0.53/0.52, all P < 0.01), whereas oscillometric PWV gave stronger correlations with OBP than ABP or HBP. In linear regression analysis, the variation of LVMI was determined by night-time ABP, of IMT by HBP and of PWV by OBP and 24-h ABP. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that in young individuals, target organ damage is mainly determined by out-of-office rather than office BP. Home and ambulatory BP give comparable associations with preclinical organ damage.

Diagnostic accuracy of a novel cuffless self-blood pressure monitor for atrial fibrillation screening in the elderly.

Blood pressure (BP) monitors equipped with atrial fibrillation (AF) detection algorithm are attractive screening tools for AF in elderly hypertensives. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a novel cuffless pocket-size self-BP monitor (Freescan, Maisense) equipped with an AF detection algorithm, which displays results for the detection of "AF" or "Arrhythmia" during routine BP measurement. Subjects aged >65 years or 60-65 years with hypertension, diabetes, or cardiovascular disease were subjected to BP measurements using the Freescan device with simultaneous continuous Holter electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring. Readings with device notification "Instability" (29%) or "Error" (20%) were discarded. Data from 136 subjects with five valid Freescan BP measurements were analyzed (age 73.8 ± 7.1 years, males 63%, treated hypertensives 88%, AF in ECG 21%). Analysis of 680 Freescan readings vs ECG revealed specificity 99%, sensitivity 67%, and diagnostic accuracy 93% for AF diagnosis. When the "Arrhythmia" notification was considered as AF diagnosis, the sensitivity was improved (93%, 96%, and 93%, respectively). Analysis of AF diagnosis in subjects (diagnosis defined as at least three of five readings indicating "AF" or "Arrhythmia") revealed specificity, sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy for AF detection at 94%, 100%, and 95%, respectively. These data suggest that the Freescan cuffless device could be used as a useful screening tool for AF detection during routine self-measurement of BP in the elderly.

Blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: review and meta-analysis of evidence on accuracy and clinical relevance.

: Atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexists with hypertension in the elderly and multiplies the risk of stroke and death. Blood pressure (BP) measurement in patients with AF is difficult and uncertain and has been a classic exclusion criterion in hypertension clinical trials leading to limited research data. This article reviews the evidence on the accuracy of BP measurement in AF performed using different methods (office, ambulatory, home) and devices (auscultatory, oscillometric) and its clinical relevance in predicting cardiovascular damage. The current evidence suggests the following: (i) Interobserver and intra-observer variation in auscultatory BP measurement is increased in AF because of increased beat-to-beat BP variability and triplicate measurement is required; (ii) Data from validation studies of automated electronic BP monitors in AF are limited and methodologically heterogeneous and suggest reasonable accuracy in measuring SBP and a small yet consistent overestimation of DBP; (iii) 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring is feasible in AF, with similar proportion of errors as in individuals without AF; (iv) both auscultatory and automated oscillometric BP measurements appear to be clinically relevant in AF, providing similar associations with intra-arterial BP measurements and with indices of preclinical cardiac damage as in patients without AF, and predict cardiovascular events and death; (v) Screening for AF in the elderly using an AF-specific algorithm during routine automated office, home or ambulatory BP measurement has high diagnostic accuracy. In conclusion, in AF patients, BP measurement is important, reliable, and clinically relevant and should not be neglected in clinical research and in practice.

Atrial Fibrillation Detection During 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: Comparison With 24-Hour Electrocardiography.

This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a novel 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitor (Microlife WatchBP O3 Afib) with implemented algorithm for automated atrial fibrillation (AF) detection during each ABP measurement. One hundred subjects (mean age 70.6±8.2 [SD] years; men 53%; hypertensives 85%; 17 with permanent AF; 4 paroxysmal AF; and 79 non-AF) had simultaneous 24-hour ABP monitoring and 24-hour Holter monitoring. Among a total of 6410 valid ABP readings, 1091 (17%) were taken in ECG AF rhythm. In reading-to-reading ABP analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ABP monitoring in detecting AF were 93%, 87%, and 88%, respectively. In non-AF subjects, 12.8% of the 24-hour ABP readings indicated false-positive AF, of whom 27% were taken during supraventricular premature beats. There was a strong association between the proportion of false-positive AF readings and that of supraventricular premature beats (r=0.67; P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that in paroxysmal AF and non-AF subjects, AF-positive readings at 26% during 24-hour ABP monitoring had 100%/85% sensitivity/specificity (area under the curve 0.91; P<0.01) for detecting paroxysmal AF. These findings suggest that in elderly hypertensives, a novel 24-hour ABP monitor with AF detector has high sensitivity and moderate specificity for AF screening during routine ABP monitoring. Thus, in elderly hypertensives, a 24-hour ABP recording with at least 26% of the readings suggesting AF indicates a high probability for AF diagnosis and should be regarded as an indication for performing 24-hour Holter monitoring.

Seasonal variation in meteorological parameters and office, ambulatory and home blood pressure: predicting factors and clinical implications.

This study investigated the relationship between seasonal variations in blood pressure (BP) and the corresponding changes in meteorological parameters and weather-induced patients' discomfort. Hypertensives on stable treatment were assessed in winter-1, summer and winter-2 with clinic (CBP), home (HBP) and 24-hour ambulatory BP (ABP). Discomfort indices derived from temperature, humidity and atmospheric pressure that reflected subjects' discomfort were evaluated. Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension was assessed with a questionnaire. Sixty subjects (mean age 65.1±8.8 [s.d.], 39 men) were analyzed. CBP, HBP and daytime ABP were lower in summer than in winter (P<0.01). Nighttime ABP was unchanged, which resulted in a 55% higher proportion of non-dippers (P<0.001). All the discomfort indices that reflected weather-induced subjects' discomfort were higher in summer (P<0.05) and systolic daytime ABP was <110 mm Hg in 15 subjects (25%). Seasonal changes in temperature and the discomfort indices were correlated with BP changes (P<0.05). Multivariate analyses revealed that winter BP levels, seasonal differences in temperature, female gender and the use of diuretics predicted the summer BP decline. In conclusion, all aspects of the BP profile, except nighttime ABP, are reduced in summer, resulting in an increased prevalence of non-dippers in summer with unknown consequences. Seasonal BP changes are influenced by changes in meteorological parameters, anthropometric and treatment characteristics. Trials are urgently needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of excessive BP decline in summer and management guidelines for practicing physicians should be developed.

Changing relationship among clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure with increasing age.

Studies in adults have shown similar levels of home (HBP) and daytime ambulatory blood pressure (dABP), which are lower than clinic blood pressure (CBP) measurements. This study investigated the impact of age on these differences. A total of 642 untreated children, adolescents, and adults referred to a hypertension clinic were evaluated with CBP, HBP, and dABP measurements within 4 weeks (mean age 38.6 ± 19.4 years; range 5-78 years; 61.1% males). In children, dABP was higher than both CBP and HBP. These differences were progressively eliminated with increasing age, and after the age of 30 years, dABP was similar to HBP, and both were lower than CBP. In subjects aged ≥60 years, dABP appeared to be lower than HBP. Age and hypertension appeared to be the main independent predictors of the differences among the three methods.These data suggest that the relationship between office and out-of-office blood pressure measurements is not the same across all age groups and should be taken into account in the evaluation of subjects with elevated blood pressure in clinical practice.

Asleep home blood pressure monitoring in obstructive sleep apnea: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is known to be related to nocturnal blood pressure (BP) and nondipping hypertension. This pilot study evaluated night-time BP assessed using a home monitor in patients with OSA. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Patients referred to a sleep clinic were subjected to polysomnography, clinic BP measurements, and home BP monitoring using a device that allows daytime (3 days, two duplicate readings per day) and automated night-time BP measurement (3 nights, three readings per night). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included [72% men, mean age 48.7±10.8 years, clinic BP 131.2±19.6/84.1±11.9 mmHg, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI): 35.2±25.7]. All BP measurements were significantly correlated with the polysomnography indices. There was a consistent trend toward stronger correlations of the night-time diastolic home BP with the AHI (r=0.56), the duration of desaturation (0.53), and the maximum (-0.57) and minimum (-0.48) arterial oxygen saturation (all P<0.001). In stepwise multivariate analysis (independent variables age, sex, body weight, smoking status, and BP parameters), the AHI was associated independently with weight and night-time diastolic home BP (R=0.53). CONCLUSION: In patients with OSA, the assessment of night-time BP using a home monitor appears to be feasible and related to the severity of OSA. Given the wide availability of home BP monitoring in clinical practice, this method appears to be useful in the evaluation of BP in patients with OSA.

Arterial stiffness predicts risk for long-term recurrence in patients with type 2 diabetes admitted for acute coronary event.

OBJECTIVES: to investigate the predictive value of arterial stiffness (AS) estimation for long-term recurrences in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) following acute coronary event. PATIENTS AND METHODS: prospective observational study involving 119 DM2 patients without history of coronary heart disease admitted with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Medical history, anthropometrics, smoking, HbA1c, lipid profile, troponine-I levels, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were recorded. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) was measured 1 month after discharge. Patients were followed up for 36 months or to reach an end-point: cardiovascular death, acute coronary event, angioplasty or hospitalization for acute heart failure. To facilitate analysis, patients were divided into two groups according to cf-PWV, using the accepted cut-off value of 12m/s. RESULTS: overall, 34 patients had a recurrence. In Kaplan-Meier analysis patients with cf-PWV>12m/s had mean time-to-event 353±43 days compared to 505±115 days for patients with cf-PWV≤12m/s, log rank=0.0252. In multivariate analysis factors independently associated with recurrence were age (66.53±6.87 vs. 61.54±10.77 years, p=0.015), LVEF (41.66±8.21 vs. 47.58±8.11%, p=0.001) and cf-PWV (13.94±2.91 vs. 12.35±2.77m/s, p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: AS estimation in patients with DM2 after STEMI discriminate patients at higher risk for 3-year recurrence, and maybe valuable for distinguishing patients likely to require a more rigorous therapeutic intervention.

Automated blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The measurement of blood pressure in atrial fibrillation is considered as difficult and uncertain, and current guidelines recommend the use of the auscultatory method. The accuracy of automated blood pressure monitors in atrial fibrillation remains controversial. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed of studies comparing automated (oscillometric or automated Korotkov) versus manual auscultatory blood pressure measurements (mercury or aneroid sphygmomanometer) in patients with sustained atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: Twelve validations were analyzed (566 patients; five home, three ambulatory and three office devices). Pooled correlation coefficients between automated and manual blood pressure measurements were stronger for SBP than DBP (r  =  0.89 versus 0.76, P  <  0.001). Automated measurements were higher than manual measurements [pooled average SBP difference 0.5 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.9, 1.9; DBP 2.5 mmHg, 95%CI -0.6, 5.7). The mean difference was within 5 mmHg in six and four (SBP and DBP, respectively) of six validations. The SD of mean difference was within 8  mmHg in two and three (SBP and DBP, respectively) of four validations. The proportion of absolute automated-manual differences within 5 mmHg was at least 65% in four and two (SBP and DBP, respectively) of eight validations. Three studies showed no impact of heart rate on the automated-manual blood pressure differences. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence and significant heterogeneity in the studies that validated automated blood pressure monitors in atrial fibrillation. These monitors appear to be accurate in measuring SBP but not DBP. Given that atrial fibrillation is common in the elderly, in whom systolic hypertension is more common and important than diastolic hypertension, automated monitors appear to be appropriate for self-home but not for office measurement.

Assessment of the diurnal blood pressure profile and detection of non-dippers based on home or ambulatory monitoring.

BACKGROUND: A unique advantage of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring is the assessment of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) and the detection of non-dippers. This study assessed nocturnal BP and non-dippers using a novel home BP (HBP) monitor. METHODS: Eighty-one hypertensives performed within 2 weeks ABP (24-h, Microlife WatchBP O3) and HBP monitoring (Microlife WatchBPN) during daytime (6 days, duplicate morning and evening measurements) and nighttime (automated asleep measurements, 3 nights, 3 readings/night). Patients' preference in using ABP or HBP was assessed by a questionnaire. RESULTS: Strong associations were found between ABP and HBP (intraclass correlation coefficients for awake systolic/diastolic 0.75/0.81; asleep 0.87/0.85). No statistically significant difference was found between HBP and ABP (mean difference ± SD awake systolic/diastolic 1.5 ± 10.1/-1.1 ± 6.0 mm Hg, P = 0.20/0.09; asleep -0.4 ± 7.8/-1.0 ± 5.3, P = 0.63/0.09). There was substantial agreement (74%, kappa 0.2) between ABP and HBP in the detection of non-dippers, which was similar to the previously reported test-retest reproducibility of repeated ABP monitoring in the diagnosis of non-dippers. Moderate to severe disturbance from ABP monitoring was reported by 18% of the participants and severe restriction of their daily activities by 9, vs. 3 and 1.5%, respectively for HBP (P < 0.001/ <0.01, for comparisons respectively). Nighttime BP monitoring and cuff discomfort were the main complaints for ABP (46 and 32%, respectively) and HBP (34 and 28%), whereas 89% reported more nighttime sleep disturbance by ABP than HBP (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: HBP monitoring appears to be a reliable and well accepted by users alternative to ABP for the assessment of nocturnal BP and the detection of non-dippers.