Effects of conditions of an experimental model to evaluate methods of electric-fence strand addition to barbed-wire fence to contain goats.

Growing meat goats of 4 types (Boer and Spanish of both wethers and doelings) were used to evaluate conditions for a method of testing efficacy of electric-fence strand additions to barbed-wire fence used for cattle to also contain goats. Animals were allocated to 8 sets, with each set consisting of 5 groups. There was 1 goat of each of the 4 types in a group. One side of five 2.4- × 3.7-m evaluation pens consisted of barbed-wire strands at 30, 56, 81, 107, and 132 cm from the ground. Evaluation pens were adjacent to a pasture with abundant vegetation. Fence treatments (FT) were electrified strands (6 kV) at 15- and 43- (LowHigh), 15- and 23- (LowMed), 15- (Low), 23- (Med), and 43-cm (High), where Low, Med, and High abbreviations are for low, medium, and high heights from the ground, respectively. For adaptation, there were 4-wk and sequential exposures to evaluation pens: wk 1, no electric strands; wk 2, 1 strand at 0 kV; wk 3, LowHigh; and wk 4, LowHigh. There were 6 periods for measurements, each separated by 1 wk. During the 1-wk intervals on pasture, sets were exposed to 1 interval treatment without and another with 2 electric strands (6 kV) positioned next to supplement troughs, to potentially affect familiarity with electrified strands and influence subsequent behavior. All animal sets were used for measurements in period 1 in a completely randomized design (CRD). Four sets were also used in 4-wk subsequent measurement periods for a 5 × 5 Latin square (LS). All animal sets were exposed to the same FT in period 6 as in period 1. Behavior in evaluation pens was observed for 1 h with a video surveillance system in the 6 periods. There were no effects of gender and few and minor effects of preliminary and interval treatments. The percentage of animals that exited evaluation pens differed (P < 0.05) among FT, with the CRD approach in period 1 (25%, 47%, 38%, 66%, and 84%; SEM = 8.0) and with repeated measures in periods 1 and 6 (6%, 22%, 22%, 63%, and 81% for LowHigh, LowMed, Low, High, and Med, respectively; SEM = 4.9), and between breeds in periods 1 (34% and 70%) and 1 and 6 (28% and 50% for Boer and Spanish, respectively). For the LS approach, FT affected exit (31%, 23%, 16%, 35%, and 30%; SEM = 5.3) and breeds differed (P < 0.05), as well (12% and 43%). Exit decreased as period advanced (60%, 35%, 23%, 10%, and 8%, for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively; SEM = 5.3). In conclusion, breed should be considered in the model being developed. A LS approach was not suitable, but a CRD experiment after these adaptation procedures appears promising.

Effects of different fresh-cut forages and their hays on feed intake, digestibility, heat production, and ruminal methane emission by Boer x Spanish goats.

Twenty-four yearling Boer × Spanish wethers were used to assess effects of different forages, either fresh (Exp. 1) or as hay (Exp. 2), on feed intake, digestibilities, heat production, and ruminal methane emission. Treatments were: 1) Sericea lespedeza (SER; Lespedeza cuneata), a legume high in condensed tannins (CT; 20% and 15% in fresh forage and hay, respectively), 2) SER supplemented with polyethylene glycol (SER-PEG; 25 g/d), 3) alfalfa (Medicago sativa), a legume low in CT (ALF), and 4) sorghum-sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor), a grass low in CT (GRASS). Experiments were 22 d, which included 16 d for acclimatization followed by a 6-d period for fecal and urine collection, and gas exchange measurement (last 2 d). Intake of OM was 867, 823, 694, and 691 g/d (SEM = 20.1) with fresh forage, and 806, 887, 681, and 607 g/d with hay for SER, SER-PEG, ALF, and GRASS, respectively (SEM = 46.6). Apparent total tract N digestion was greater for SER-PEG vs. SER (P < 0.001) with fresh forage (46.3%, 66.5%, 81.7%, and 73.2%; SEM = 1.71) and hay (49.7%, 71.4%, 65.4%, and 54.8% for SER, SER-PEG, ALF, and GRASS, respectively; SEM = 1.57). Intake of ME was similar among treatments with fresh forage (8.24, 8.06, 7.42, and 7.70 MJ/d; SEM = 0.434) and with hay was greater for SER-PEG than ALF (P < 0.03) and GRASS (P < 0.001) (8.63, 10.40, 8.15, and 6.74 MJ/d for SER, SER-PEG, ALF, and GRASS, respectively; SEM = 0.655). The number of ciliate protozoa in ruminal fluid was least for SER with fresh forage (P < 0.01) (9.8, 20.1, 21.0, and 33.6 × 10(5)/ml; SEM = 2.76) and hay (P < 0.02) (6.3, 11.4, 13.6, and 12.5 × 10(5)/ml for SER, SER-PEG, ALF, and GRASS, respectively; SEM = 1.43). Methane emission as a percentage of DE intake was lower (P < 0.01) for SER vs. ALF and GRASS with fresh forage (6.6, 8.3, 9.4, and 9.2%; SEM = 0.64) and hay (4.3, 4.9, 6.4, and 6.7% for SER, SER-PEG, ALF, and GRASS, respectively; SEM = 0.38). In summary, methane emission in this short-term experiment was similar between a legume and grass low in CT as fresh forage and hay. The CT in SER markedly decreased N digestibility and elicited a moderate decline in ruminal methane emission. Supplementation with PEG alleviated the effect of CT on N digestibility but not ruminal methane emission, presumably because of different modes of action. In conclusion, potential of using CT-containing forage as a means of decreasing ruminal methane emission requires further study, such as with longer feeding periods.

Effects of restricted feed intake on heat energy by different goat breeds.

Sixteen Boer goat doelings, 16 Spanish doelings, and 8 Angora doelings and 8 wethers, 283, 316, and 330 d of age initially (SEM = 5.0), respectively, were used to evaluate effects of nutrient restriction on heat energy (HE). During the first and second 10-wk phases, 8 animals of each breed were fed a 50% concentrate pelletized diet at a level adequate for maintenance and moderate energy accretion (CONT). Other animals were fed approximately 50% of these amounts in phase 1 relative to initial BW, followed by the greater level of feeding in phase 2 based on initial or actual BW when greater (REST). Average daily gain was 43, -20, 16, -78, 8, and -48 g in phase 1 (SEM = 5.0) and 26, 44, 50, 65, 27, and 32 g in phase 2 (SEM = 3.5) for Angora-CONT, Angora-REST, Boer-CONT, Boer-REST, Spanish-CONT, and Spanish-REST, respectively. Total HE was greater for CONT vs. REST in both phases (P < 0.001), greater in phase 1 for Angora than for Boer (P < 0.01) and Spanish (P < 0.01), and greatest (P < 0.01) in phase 2 among breeds for Angora [481, 347, 430, 356, 424, and 338 kJ/kg of BW(0.75) per day in phase 1 (SEM = 11.1), and 494, 479, 445, 397, 444, and 406 kJ/kg of BW(0.75) per day in phase 2 (SEM = 11.3) for Angora-CONT, Angora-REST, Boer-CONT, Boer-REST, Spanish-CONT, and Spanish-REST, respectively]. Equations describing the temporal pattern of HE (kJ/kg of BW(0.75) per day), expressed as a percentage of the wk-0 value and corrected for corresponding breed × week CONT means, in phase 1 were 95.8 ± 2.43 - (8.18 ± 1.144 × week) + (0.655 ± 0.1098 × week(2)) for Angora (R(2) = 0.58), 95.3 ± 2.63 - (4.34 ± 1.237 × wk) + (0.271 ± 0.1187 × wk(2)) for Boer (R(2) = 0.41), and 97.4 ± 2.21 - (4.69 ± 1.068 × wk) + (0.282 ± 0.1021 × wk(2)) for Spanish (R(2) = 0.53). Phase 2 equations were 78.9 ± 2.22 + (8.74 ± 1.036 × wk) - (0.608 ± 0.0095 × wk(2)) for Angora (R(2) = 0.60), 77.5 ± 2.10 + (3.30 ± 0.978 × wk) - (0.153 ± 0.0942 × wk(2)) for Boer (R(2) = 0.39), and 80.6 ± 2.50 + (4.50 ± 1.165 × wk) - (0.208 ± 0.1122 × wk(2)) for Spanish (R(2) = 0.43). These equations indicate that changes in HE in response to nutrient restriction and realimentation were more rapid and of greater magnitude in Angora vs. Boer and Spanish. The temporal pattern of decline in HE by Boer and Spanish during restriction was similar, but the subsequent rise with realimentation was slower and smaller for Boer. In conclusion, most appropriate methods of predicting change in the maintenance energy requirement during and after periods of limited feed intake may differ among breeds of goats.

Effects of stage of lactation and dietary forage level on body composition of Alpine dairy goats.

Multiparous Alpine does (42) were used to determine how stage of lactation and dietary forage level affect body composition. The feeding and body composition portion of the study had a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement of treatments. Eighteen does were fed a 40% forage diet (40F) and 18 received a diet with 60% forage (60F) for approximately 2, 4, or 6 mo of lactation (59 +/- 1.3, 116 +/- 1.0, and 184 +/- 1.4 d, respectively), followed by determination of body composition (6 does per diet at each time of slaughter). Does were assigned sequentially to treatments as kidding occurred. The 60F diet had 20% more dehydrated alfalfa pellets than the 40F diet, with higher levels of corn and soybean meal and inclusion of supplemental fat in the 40F diet. Initial body composition measures were made with 6 other does a few days after kidding (0 mo; 4 +/- 0.6 d). Before parturition, does were fed a 50% concentrate diet free choice. Intake of dry matter was greater for 60F than for 40F, average daily gain tended to be affected by an interaction between diet and month (0, 24, 121, -61, 46, and 73 g), and 4% fat-corrected milk was less in mo 5 to 6 than earlier. Internal fat mass was greatest among times at 6 mo and greater for 40F than for 60F. Mass of the gastrointestinal tract was less for 40F than for 60F and decreased with increasing time in lactation. Concentrations of fat in the carcass (13.8, 13.1, 16.5, 11.2, 11.5, and 14.4%), noncarcass tissues (18.6, 24.2, 33.3, 14.3, 16.5, and 24.5%), and empty body (16.5, 18.7, 25.2, 12.9, 14.1, and 19.5% for 40F at 2 mo, 40F at 4 mo, 40F at 6 mo, 60F at 2 mo, 60F at 4 mo, and 60F at 6 mo, respectively) were affected by stage of lactation and diet. Based on daily change in tissue mass and energy, energy concentration in tissue mobilized or accreted was 16, 20, and 32 MJ/kg in 1 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 6 mo of lactation, respectively. In conclusion, based on tissue mass, more energy was expended by the gastrointestinal tract with 60F than with 40F. Considerable internal fat appeared to be mobilized in early lactation, particularly with the diet moderate to high in forage, with more rapid and a greater magnitude of repletion by does consuming the diet lower in forage. The concentration of energy in tissue mobilized or accreted varied with stage of lactation, being considerably greater at 5 to 6 mo of lactation than earlier.

Effects of breed and diet on growth and body composition of crossbred Boer and Spanish wether goats.

Sixty growing 3/4 Boer x 1/4 Spanish (BS) and Spanish (SP) wethers were used to determine influences of diet and breed on growth and body composition. A pelleted 50% concentrate diet (CD) and a diet based on grass hay (HD) were fed for ad libitum intake. Six wethers of each breed were slaughtered at 0 wk (total of 12). Six wethers of each diet-breed combination were slaughtered at 14 and 28 wk (24 per time) after consumption of the CD or HD. Initial BW of fed wethers were 21.6 and 18.8 kg for BS and SP, respectively (SEM = 0.7). Average daily gain during the entire experiment was influenced by an interaction (P < 0.05) between breed and diet (199, 142, 44, and 50 g/d for BS:CD, SP:CD, BS:HD, and SP:HD, respectively). Carcass mass was greater (P < 0.05) for CD vs. HD (56.2, 56.2, 53.2, and 54.0% of empty BW for BS:CD, SP:CD, BS:HD, and SP:HD, respectively). Mass of the liver (2.11, 1.92, 2.00, and 1.98% of empty BW; SEM = 0.05) and gastrointestinal tract (5.50, 4.83, 8.43, and 8.36% of empty BW for BS:CD, SP:CD, BS:HD, and SP:HD, respectively; SEM = 0.16) tended (P < 0.07) to be influenced by an interaction between breed and diet. Mass of internal fat (12.2, 12.1, 3.4, and 3.4% empty BW for BS:CD, SP:CD, BS:HD, and SP:HD, respectively; SEM = 0.3) differed (P < 0.05) between diets. Energy in the carcass (320, 236, 87, and 79 MJ), noncarcass tissues (318, 237, 77, and 72 MJ), and empty body (638, 472, 164, and 150 MJ) ranked (P < 0.05) BS:CD > SP:CD > BS:HD and SP:HD. Empty body concentration of protein was 18.3, 17.5, 18.3, and 19.7% (SEM = 0.3) and of fat was 24.0, 23.4, 10.8, and 10.3% for BS:CD, SP:CD, BS:HD, and SP:HD, respectively (SEM = 0.6). Energy concentration in accreted tissue was 17.0, 18.7, 16.3, and 6.4 MJ/kg for CD:wk 1 to 14, CD:wk 15 to 28, HD:wk 1 to 14, and HD:wk 15 to 28, respectively (SEM = 1.4). In conclusion, relatively high growth potential of growing Boer crossbred goats with a moderate to high nutritional plane does not entail a penalty in realized growth when the nutritional plane is low. Body composition of growing Boer and Spanish goats is fairly similar regardless of growth rate. For growing meat goats other than with a prolonged limited nutritional plane, an average energy concentration in accreted tissue is 17.3 MJ/kg.

Technical Note: Effects of tethering on herbage selection, intake and digestibility, grazing behavior, and energy expenditure by Boer x Spanish goats grazing high-quality herbage.

Twenty-four yearling Boer x Spanish goats were used in a crossover experiment to determine the effects of tethering on herbage selection, intake and digestibility, grazing behavior, and energy expenditure (EE) with high-quality herbage. Four 0.72-ha paddocks of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrium) were grazed in the spring. Each paddock hosted 6 animals, 3 with free movement and 3 attached to a 3-m tether that was moved daily and provided access to an area of 28.3 m(2). One animal of each treatment and paddock was used to determine herbage selection, fecal output, or grazing behavior and EE. Herbage DM mass in tethered areas before grazing averaged 2,649 and 2,981 kg/ha in periods 1 and 2, respectively. The CP concentration in ingesta was greater (P < 0.05; 23.1 and 20.3 +/- 0.82%) for free vs. tethered animals, although in vitro true DM digestion (75.7 and 76.5 +/- 1.20%, respectively) did not differ (P > 0.05) between treatments. Intake of ME based on in vitro true DM digestion and fecal output was greater (P < 0.05) for free vs. tethered animals (12.7 and 10.4 +/- 0.89 MJ/d). No treatment effects were observed (P > 0.05) for time spent ruminating or grazing (405 and 366 +/- 42.5 min/d, respectively), although mean EE was greater (P < 0.05) for free vs. tethered animals (633 and 512 +/- 27.4 kJ/kg of BW(0.75) for free and tethered, respectively), with differences (P < 0.05) between treatments at each hour of the day. Tethering animals may be acceptable to model those with free movement for some measures such as ingesta composition but appears inappropriate for others, such as energy metabolism.

Effects of different management practices on preweaning and early postweaning growth of Alpine kids.

Two sets of 40 dairy goat Alpine kids (3-9 days of age) were used to determine effects of group versus individual pens, preweaning access to forage and different milk feeding restriction regimens on preweaning and early postweaning growth. Treatments in the first experiment were: C1: individual pens; C2: two kids per pen; P: group pen; and PF: P plus free access to alfalfa hay. Treatment did not affect ADG gain in the 8-week preweaning phase (167, 173, 167 and 168g per day; S.E.=4.5) or in week 1-12 (137, 134, 149 and 128g per day for C1, C2, P and PF, respectively; S.E.=6.7). Treatments in the second experiment were: AL: ad libitum milk intake with two meals in week 3-8, then 50% of intake on the preceding few days with one meal in week 9-10; R-1X and R-2X: 75% of intake on the last few days of week 2 with one or two meals, respectively, in week 3-8, then, 50% intake with one meal in week 9-10; and R-2X-1X: 75% intake with two meals in week 3-6, then 37.5% intake with one meal in week 7-10. Milk DM intake in week 1-10 was greatest (P<0.05) among treatments for AL (174, 115, 128 and 113g per day for AL, R-2X, R-1X and R-2X-1X, respectively). Starter diet DM intake (g per day) was 51, 78, 72 and 143 in week 7-8 (S.E.=16); 138, 194, 165 and 249 in week 9-10 (S.E.=15); 343, 396, 388 and 417 in week 11-12 (S.E.=47); and 508, 530, 489 and 539 in week 13-14 (S.E.=38) for AL, R-2X, R-1X and R-2X-1X, respectively. ADG (g per day) was 139, 120, 119 and 131 in week 1-10 (S.E.=7) and 105, 109, 123 and 117 in week 11-14 (S.E.=16) for AL, R-2X, R-1X and R-2X-1X, respectively. In conclusion, although group pens and forage access may not enhance ADG of artificially reared dairy goat kids by promoting early dry feed consumption restricted feeding regimens can yield preweaning and early postweaning ADG comparable to ad libitum milk intake. Also, feeding milk in restricted amounts once daily appears feasible, and a second reduction in milk intake in the latter part of the suckling phase may further stimulate dry feed intake.

Dairy goat performance with different dietary concentrate levels in late lactation.

Alpine yearling doelings (22; 44+/-1.0kg) and mature does (25; 59+/-1.7kg) were used in an experiment with 16 weeks in late lactation, 8-13 weeks dry and 12 weeks in the subsequent lactation. Diets of 20, 35, 50 or 65% concentrate and 2.18, 2.34, 2.49 and 2.62Mcal/kg ME, respectively (20C, 35C, 50C and 65C treatments, respectively), were consumed ad libitum in late lactation, with a 35% concentrate diet (2.18Mcal/kg ME) in the first 4 weeks of the dry phase and 50% concentrate (2.65Mcal/kg ME) until kidding. Other goats consuming 20 or 35% concentrate in late lactation received 65 (2.65Mcal/kg ME) or 50% concentrate, respectively, in the dry phase (20A and 35A treatments, respectively). All goats consumed a 50% concentrate diet (2.42Mcal/kg ME) in the subsequent early lactation. DM intake in late lactation was similar among treatments (1.95, 2.21, 2.17, 2.10, 1.99 and 2.00kg per day for 20C, 35C, 50C, 65C, 20A and 35A, respectively; S.E.=0.098) and greater (P<0.05) for does versus doelings (2.16 versus 1.98kg per day; S.E.=0.058); DM intake in the dry phase was similar among treatments. Relative to BW, DM intake was greater (P<0.05) for doelings than for does in late lactation (4.16 versus 3.43% BW) and early lactation (4.56 versus 3.80% BW). The effect of dietary treatment on milk production in late lactation varied with parity (P<0.05); milk production by doelings was 1.39, 1.49, 1.43, 1.57, 1.29 and 1.52kg per day and by does was 1.01, 1.89, 2.38, 1.63, 1.17 and 1.34kg per day for 20C, 35C, 50C, 65C, 20A and 35A, respectively; S.E.=0.200). BW change during the entire 16 weeks late lactation phase was greater (P<0.05) for 65C than for other treatments except 50C (6.9, 5.6, 9.1, 10.4, 5.8 and 4.0kg for 20C, 35C, 50C, 65C, 20A and 35A, respectively; S.E.=1.28), although BW at kidding and litter weight were similar among treatments. BW, DM intake and milk production in the first 12 weeks of the subsequent lactation were not affected by dietary treatment or parity. In conclusion, with moderate to high quality forage in late lactation and a moderate level of concentrate in the dry period, the level of concentrate fed in late lactation and in the dry period may not affect subsequent lactation performance regardless of parity. Milk production by doelings in late lactation appears relatively less responsive to dietary concentrate level than that by does.