ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Isolated tricuspid valve surgery has been associated with early mortality rates of up to 10%. With rapidly emerging interventional catheter-based options, the question arises whether current technical and perioperative protocols in cardiac surgery translate into lower than previously expected mortality rates, especially when looking at data from high-volume centers. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center analysis in 369 patients undergoing isolated tricuspid valve repair (n = 256) or replacement (n = 113) between 2009 and 2021. Surgical approaches included full sternotomy, as well as right-sided minithoracotomy. According to a recently introduced clinical risk score, patients were divided into scoring groups, and observed (O) versus expected (E) early mortality were compared. Pre- and postoperative tricuspid valve function was also analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 30-day mortality was 4.1%, ranging from 0% (scoring group 0-1 points) to 8.7% (scoring group ≥ 10 points), which was substantially lower than the expected early mortality (2% in the lowest to 34% in the highest scoring group). Preoperative tricuspid regurgitation was severe in 71.3% (n = 263), moderate to severe in 14.9% (n = 55), and mild or less in 6.5% (n = 24). The corresponding postoperative values were 0% (n = 0), 1.4% (n = 5), and 81.6% (n = 301). CONCLUSION: Our high-volume center data indicate substantially lower than predicted 30-day mortality in different cardiac surgical risk scoring groups. The majority of patients had zero to minimal residual tricuspid valve insufficiency postoperatively. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare tricuspid valve functional results and long-term outcomes of surgical versus interventional procedures in patients undergoing isolated tricuspid valve procedures.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been found to correlate with the severity of aortic valve stenosis and to provide prognostic information in aortic stenosis patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. There is a paucity of data describing the association between clinical outcomes after TAVI and NT-proBNP levels. We investigated the evolution and prognostic value of NT-proBNP levels after TAVI. METHOD AND RESULTS: We prospectively collected data on the baseline characteristics, NT-proBNP levels (baseline, post-treatment and discharge) and adverse clinical outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI from 2007 to 2010. Using a univariable and multivariable Cox regression model, pre- and postimplantation NT-proBNP tertile levels were correlated to 30-day and 1-year mortality. A total of 373 patients underwent TAVI with either the Medtronic CoreValve or Edwards SAPIEN prosthesis. The cumulative 30-day and 1-year mortality was 7.3% and 18%, respectively. Rehospitalization for heart failure was observed in 0.8% at 30 days and 7.8% at 1 year. The tertile baseline NT-proBNP levels were identified as ≤1570 ng/L, 1571 to 4690 ng/L and ≥4691 ng/L. In the univariable analysis, baseline (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.001-1.02; P=.02) and post-treatment NT-proBNP (HR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.002-1.04; P=.04) were predictors for 1-year mortality. In the multivariable analysis, however, only baseline NT-proBNP and atrial fibrillation were identified as predictors for the 1-year mortality (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; P=.006 and HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.25-9.5; P=.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: NT-proBNP and atrial fibrillation were predictors for 1-year mortality, offer independent prognostic information, and identify patients being at increased risk for mortality. Thus, NT-proBNP reveals more incremental value for patient selection and should be included in the risk stratification of patients undergoing TAVI.
