Policy brief on the current status of certification of electronic Health Records in the US and Europe.

If Electronic Health Record systems are to provide an effective contribution to healthcare, a set of benchmarks need to be set to ensure quality control and interoperability of systems. This paper outlines the prevailing status of EHR certification in the US and the EU, compares and contrasts established schemes and poses opportunities for convergence of activity in the domain designed to advance certification endeavours generally. Several EU Member States have in the past proceeded with EHR systems quality labeling and/or certification, but these differ in scope, in legal framework under which they operate, in policies (legislation and financial incentives), in organization, and perhaps most importantly in the quality criteria used for benchmarking. Harmonization, therefore, became a must. Now, through EuroRec (with approaches ranging from self-assessment to third party certification depending on the level of confidence needed) and its Seals, the possibility to achieve this for EHR systems has started in the whole of Europe. The US HITECH Act also attempts to create incentives for all hospitals and eligible providers to adopt and use electronic information. A centerpiece of the Act is to put in place strong financial incentives to adopt and meaningfully use EHRs. The HHS/EHR Certification Programme makes use of ISO/IEC 170XX standards for accreditation, testing and certification. The approved test method addresses the functional and the interoperability requirements defined in the Final Rule criteria and standards. To date six Authorized Testing and Certification Bodies (ATCBs) are testing and certifying products in the US.

Certification of Electronic Health Record systems and the importance of the validation of clinical archetypes.

If Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems are to provide an effective contribution to healthcare across Europe, a set of benchmarks need to be set to ensure the quality of such systems. This article describes the results of the EU funded QRec- project and emphasizes the need for validation of clinical archetypes to support the semantic interoperability between EHR systems and other interacting eHealth applications.

Health data exchange, health data sharing and decentralised clinical data collections--recommendations from a Belgian expert group.

The Belgian Federal Health Authorities are willing to redefine their eHealth vision and to reformulate their strategy in consensus with healthcare professionals and other domain experts. The National Health Insurance Institute ordered end 2007 a study to a group of experts, representing the majority of the eHealth stakeholders. The aim of the study was to define the strategy to be followed regarding health data exchange, data sharing, decentralised clinical data collections and Electronic Health Records. The experts issued, June 2008, a description of the current standing regarding nationally available (or to be made available) services as well as a set of priorities (structural and technological ones) for the coming years. This paper presents the experts' recommendations and some translated excerpts of their report.