Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Radiat Res ; 162(3): 270-86, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15332997

ABSTRACT

Computerized video time lapse (CVTL) microscopy was used to observe cellular events induced by ionizing radiation (10-12 Gy) in nonclonogenic cells of the wild-type HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cell line and its three isogenic derivative lines in which p21 (CDKN1A), 14-3-3sigma or both checkpoint genes (double-knockout) had been knocked out. Cells that fused after mitosis or failed to complete mitosis were classified together as cells that underwent mitotic catastrophe. Seventeen percent of the wild-type cells and 34-47% of the knockout cells underwent mitotic catastrophe to enter generation 1 with a 4N content of DNA, i.e., the same DNA content as irradiated cells arrested in G(2) at the end of generation 0. Radiation caused a transient division delay in generation 0 before the cells divided or underwent mitotic catastrophe. Compared with the division delay for wild-type cells that express CDKN1A and 14-3-3sigma, knocking out CDKN1A reduced the delay the most for cells irradiated in G(1) (from approximately 15 h to approximately 3- 5 h), while knocking out 14-3-3sigma reduced the delay the most for cells irradiated in late S and G(2) (from approximately 18 h to approximately 3-4 h). However, 27% of wild-type cells and 17% of 14-3-3sigma(-/-) cells were arrested at 96 h in generation 0 compared with less than 1% for CDKN1A(-/-) and double-knockout cells. Thus expression of CDKN1A is necessary for the prolonged delay or arrest in generation 0. Furthermore, CDKN1A plays a crucial role in generation 1, greatly inhibiting progression into subsequent generations of both diploid cells and polyploid cells produced by mitotic catastrophe. Thus, in CDKN1A-deficient cell lines, a series of mitotic catastrophe events occurred to produce highly polyploid progeny during generations 3 and 4. Most importantly, the polyploid progeny produced by mitotic catastrophe events did not die sooner than the progeny of dividing cells. Death was identified as loss of cell movement, i.e. metabolic activity. Thus mitotic catastrophe itself is not a direct mode of death. Instead, apoptosis during interphase of both uninucleated and polyploid cells was the primary mode of death observed in the four cell types. Knocking out either CDKN1A or 14-3-3sigma increased the amount of cell death at 96 h, from 52% to approximately 70%, with an even greater increase to 90% when both genes were knocked out. Thus, in addition to effects of CDKN1A and 14-3-3sigma expression on transient cell cycle delay, CDKN1A has both an anti-proliferative and anti-apoptosis function, while 14-3-3sigma has only an anti-apoptosis function. Finally, the large alterations in the amounts of cell death did not correlate overall with the small alterations in clonogenic survival (dose-modifying ratios of 1.05-1.13); however, knocking out CDKN1A resulted in a decrease in arrested cells and an increase in survival, while knocking out 14-3-3sigma resulted in an increase in apoptosis and a decrease in survival.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/deficiency , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Cyclins/deficiency , Exonucleases/deficiency , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Microscopy, Video/methods , Neoplasm Proteins/deficiency , Tumor Stem Cell Assay/methods , 14-3-3 Proteins , Apoptosis/radiation effects , Cell Cycle/radiation effects , Cell Division/radiation effects , Cell Line, Tumor/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor/radiation effects , Cell Survival/radiation effects , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21 , Exoribonucleases , Humans , Mitosis/radiation effects , Time Factors
3.
Ultrasound Med Biol ; 29(11): 1653-9; author response 1661-2, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14654160

ABSTRACT

This commentary addresses the matter of misinterpretation of thermal dose as discussed by Herman and Harris (2002), and shows that the thermal doses they would consider as ineffective (i.e., "safe") for producing a hyperthermia-induced teratologic effect, can be highly effective ones. The matter of whether or not thermal thresholds exist for teratologic effects is reviewed. There are only opinions about thresholds. The critical experiments for ascertaining whether or not a threshold exists have not been undertaken. A power computation illustrates the requisite sample sizes (litters, fetuses) for undertaking an experimental test of whether the hyperthermic teratologic response in rats is characterized by threshold or simple linearity kinetics.


Subject(s)
Congenital Abnormalities/etiology , Hot Temperature , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/adverse effects , Animals , Body Temperature , Computational Biology , Female , Guinea Pigs , Humans , Models, Biological , Pregnancy , Rats , Sample Size , Time Factors
4.
Radiat Res ; 159(6): 705-12, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12751952

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to examine the viability and proliferation of uninucleated and multinucleated giant cells formed after 6 Gy X irradiation. The pedigrees of 102 individual EJ30 giant cells present 5 days after irradiation were analyzed from time-lapse movies captured over 6.3 days from 100 fields (100x). Pedigree analysis enabled us to study the proliferation of giant cells. The average starting size (area) of the giant cells (14500 +/- 9100 microm(2)) was approximately 25 times larger than the normal-sized cells observed after irradiation (560 +/- 200 microm(2)). From a total of 76 pedigrees of uninucleated giant cells, 42 had giant cells that either died or were arrested, while 34 divided at least once and produced progeny that divided again (five three times and three four times) before the progeny died or were arrested. Twenty-four pedigrees contained progeny that were lost from observation after dividing at least once. While most progeny continued to have giant cell morphology, two uninucleated giant cells ultimately produced progeny that contained two normal-sized cells. From a total of 26 multinucleated giant cells, only three divided. Two divided only once, but one produced progeny that divided two times. In all, 37 out of 102 giant cells divided at least once; eight of these divided four or five times with two of these pedigrees ultimately producing two normal-sized daughter cells. These results suggest that a small fraction of giant cells might be potentially clonogenic.


Subject(s)
Giant Cells/cytology , Microscopy, Video/methods , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Division/radiation effects , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Male , Stem Cells/radiation effects , Time Factors , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/radiotherapy , X-Rays
5.
Radiat Res ; 158(6): 667-77, 2002 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12452769

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to quantify the modes and kinetics of cell death for EJ30 human bladder carcinoma cells irradiated in different phases of the cell cycle. Asynchronous human bladder carcinoma cells were observed in multiple fields by computerized video time-lapse (CVTL) microscopy for one to two cell divisions before irradiation (6 Gy) and for 6-11 days afterward. By analyzing time-lapse movies collected from these fields, pedigrees were constructed showing the behaviors of 231 cells irradiated in different phases of the cell cycle (i.e. at different times after mitosis). A total of 219 irradiated cells were determined to be non-colony-forming over the time spans of the experiments. In these nonclonogenic pedigrees, cells died primarily by necrosis either without entering mitosis or over 1 to 10 postirradiation generations. A total of 105 giant cells developed from the irradiated cells or their progeny, and 30% (31/105) divided successfully. Most nonclonogenic cells irradiated in mid-S phase (9-12 h after mitosis) died by the second generation, while those irradiated either before or after this short period in mid-S phase had cell deaths occurring over one to nine postirradiation generations. The nonclonogenic cells irradiated in mid-S phase also experienced the longest average delay before their first division. Clonogenic cells (11/12 cells) divided sooner after irradiation than the average nonclonogenic cells derived from the same phase of the cell cycle. The early death and long division delay observed for nonclonogenic cells irradiated in mid-S phase could possibly result from an increase in damage induced during the transition from the replication of euchromatin to the replication of heterochromatin.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle/radiation effects , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , X-Rays , Cell Death , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Heterochromatin/metabolism , Humans , Kinetics , Male , Microscopy, Video , Mitosis/radiation effects , Software , Time Factors , Tumor Cells, Cultured
6.
Radiat Res ; 158(3): 251-91, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12175305

ABSTRACT

Around 30 years ago, a very prominent molecular biologist confidently proclaimed that nothing of fundamental importance has ever been learned by irradiating cells! The poor man obviously did not know about discoveries such as DNA repair, mutagenesis, connections between mutagenesis and carcinogenesis, genomic instability, transposable genetic elements, cell cycle checkpoints, or lines of evidence historically linking the genetic material with nucleic acids, or origins of the subject of oxidative stress in organisms, to name a few things of fundamental importance learned by irradiating cells that were well known even at that time. Early radiation studies were, quite naturally, phenomenological. They led to the realization that radiations could cause pronounced biological effects. This was followed by an accelerating expansion of investigations of the nature of these radiobiological phenomena, the beginnings of studies aimed toward better understanding the underlying mechanisms, and a better appreciation of the far-reaching implications for biology, and for society in general. Areas of principal importance included acute tissue and tumor responses for applications in medicine, whole-body radiation effects in plants and animals, radiation genetics and cytogenetics, mutagenesis, carcinogenesis, cellular radiation responses including cell reproductive death, cell cycle effects and checkpoint responses, underlying molecular targets leading to biological effects, DNA repair, and the genetic control of radiosensitivity. This review summarizes some of the highlights in these areas, and points to numerous examples where indeed, many things of considerable fundamental importance have been learned by irradiating cells.


Subject(s)
Cells/radiation effects , Radiation Genetics/history , Radiobiology/history , Animals , DNA/radiation effects , Genes/radiation effects , Genetics, Microbial/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/genetics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/history , Radiation Injuries, Experimental/history , Societies, Scientific/history
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...