Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 29(4): 383-7, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11512649

ABSTRACT

This randomized controlled study examined intubating conditions and haemodynamic changes following sevoflurane nitrous oxide induction in four groups: three different doses of alfentanil compared with low-dose alfentanil and suxamethonium. All patients received atropine 0.3 mg i.v. before induction of anaesthesia with vital capacity breaths of sevoflurane 8% (more than 7% in the inspiratory gas) in 60% nitrous oxide and oxygen. Patients were allocated randomly to four groups of intravenous supplements: group SA20, alfentanil 20 microg x kg(-1); group SA25, alfentanil 25 microg x kg(-1); group SA30, alfentanil 30 microg x kg(-1); group SSA, alfentanil 10 microg x kg(-1) and suxamethonium 1 mg x kg(-1). Orotracheal intubation and assessment of intubating conditions was performed by one of the investigators who was blinded to the subject's group. Intubating conditions were satisfactory or excellent in 83%, 80%, 92% and 96% of patients in groups SA20, SA25, SA30 and SSA respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. The increase in heart rate associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation was effectively attenuated in all groups. Mean arterial pressure decreased significantly and similarly after induction in all groups. Two minutes after intubation the mean arterial pressure was increased significantly (P<0.05) compared to the post-induction value in group SSA. The intubating conditions obtained with sevoflurane plus alfentanil 30 microg x kg(-1) were comparable to those provided by the sevoflurane, suxamethonium and alfentanil 10 microg x kg(-1) combination.


Subject(s)
Alfentanil/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Methyl Ethers/administration & dosage , Neuromuscular Depolarizing Agents/administration & dosage , Succinylcholine/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pulse , Sevoflurane , Vital Capacity
2.
Anaesthesia ; 54(3): 271-6, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10364865

ABSTRACT

One hundred unpremedicated ASA 1 or 2 patients scheduled for elective surgery were divided equally into four groups and recruited into this prospective, randomised parallel groups study. Induction was with propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 or vital-capacity breath induction with sevoflurane (> 7% in the inspiratory gas) in 65% nitrous oxide and oxygen, or gaseous induction with sevoflurane plus alfentanil 5 micrograms.kg-1 or propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 and alfentanil 5 micrograms.kg-1. The conditions for laryngeal mask insertion were assessed and graded on a three-point scale using six variables. The overall condition for laryngeal mask insertion was assessed as excellent, satisfactory or poor on the basis of total score in each group. Excellent or satisfactory conditions were observed in 25 (100%) patients in the sevoflurane-alfentanil group, 22 (88%) in the propofol-alfentanil group and 16 (64%) patients each in the propofol and sevoflurane groups (p < 0.001). A sevoflurane-alfentanil combination provides better conditions for laryngeal mask insertion when compared with sevoflurane alone, or a propofol-alfentanil combination.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Laryngeal Masks , Methyl Ethers , Propofol , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alfentanil , Anesthetics, Combined , Female , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Humans , Laryngeal Masks/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Sevoflurane
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...