Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 40(4): 737-744, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30923086

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our aim was to use 2D convolutional neural networks for automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and traumatic contusion injury from axial T2-weighted MR imaging in a cohort of patients with acute spinal cord injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients who underwent 3T MR imaging within 24 hours of spinal cord injury were included. We developed an image-analysis pipeline integrating 2D convolutional neural networks for whole spinal cord and intramedullary spinal cord lesion segmentation. Linear mixed modeling was used to compare test segmentation results between our spinal cord injury convolutional neural network (Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation) and current state-of-the-art methods. Volumes of segmented lesions were then used in a linear regression analysis to determine associations with motor scores. RESULTS: Compared with manual labeling, the average test set Dice coefficient for the Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation model was 0.93 for spinal cord segmentation versus 0.80 for PropSeg and 0.90 for DeepSeg (both components of the Spinal Cord Toolbox). Linear mixed modeling showed a significant difference between Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation compared with PropSeg (P < .001) and DeepSeg (P < .05). Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation showed significantly better adaptability to damaged areas compared with PropSeg (P < .001) and DeepSeg (P < .02). The contusion injury volumes based on automated segmentation were significantly associated with motor scores at admission (P = .002) and discharge (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation of the spinal cord compares favorably with available segmentation tools in a population with acute spinal cord injury. Volumes of injury derived from automated lesion segmentation with Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center segmentation correlate with measures of motor impairment in the acute phase. Targeted convolutional neural network training in acute spinal cord injury enhances algorithm performance for this patient population and provides clinically relevant metrics of cord injury.


Subject(s)
Deep Learning , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Motor Disorders/etiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Contusions/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male
2.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 38(3): 648-655, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28007771

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acute markers of spinal cord injury are essential for both diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between early MR imaging biomarkers after acute cervical spinal cord injury and to evaluate their predictive validity of neurologic impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 95 patients with acute spinal cord injury and preoperative MR imaging within 24 hours of injury. The American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale was used as our primary outcome measure to define neurologic impairment. We assessed several MR imaging features of injury, including axial grade (Brain and Spinal Injury Center score), sagittal grade, length of injury, maximum canal compromise, and maximum spinal cord compression. Data-driven nonlinear principal component analysis was followed by correlation and optimal-scaled multiple variable regression to predict neurologic impairment. RESULTS: Nonlinear principal component analysis identified 2 clusters of MR imaging variables related to 1) measures of intrinsic cord signal abnormality and 2) measures of extrinsic cord compression. Neurologic impairment was best accounted for by MR imaging measures of intrinsic cord signal abnormality, with axial grade representing the most accurate predictor of short-term impairment, even when correcting for surgical decompression and degree of cord compression. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of applying nonlinear principal component analysis for defining the relationship between MR imaging biomarkers in a complex clinical syndrome of cervical spinal cord injury. Of the assessed imaging biomarkers, the intrinsic measures of cord signal abnormality were most predictive of neurologic impairment in acute spinal cord injury, highlighting the value of axial T2 MR imaging.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Nervous System Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Cord Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Nervous System Diseases/physiopathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Cord Compression/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Cord Compression/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Young Adult
3.
J Neurosurg Sci ; 59(2): 119-28, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25649067

ABSTRACT

Acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is an important cause of impairment globally with estimates of incidence varying from 10.4 to 83 million inhabitants annually. These injuries typically impact younger individuals, reduce quality of life years, and are costly to patients, with lifetime costs estimated to exceed $ 4 million. Given the lifetime impact of SCI, establishing clear practice guidelines for the acute non-operative management of these injuries remains important. In 2013 the Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) released revised guidelines on the topic of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). In the present article, we explore the seven general management subsections of the cervical SCI guidelines, review the key literature supporting each recommendation, and review the additional literature since the publication of the 2013 guidelines. Our review found a paucity of significant updates within several of the SCI guideline sections. As a result of our findings we propose a collaborative, multi-institutional prospective study to evaluate many pressing limitations of the current literature. In particular, the development of common data elements that allow consistent, reproducible data collection should be made a priority.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Humans
5.
Stud Fam Plann ; 15(2): 93-7, 1984.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6710552

ABSTRACT

Of the 5,918 clients undergoing early abortions at a subsidized, widely advertised clinic in New Delhi, India, in 1980 and 1981, an unexpectedly high percentage were both young and nulliparous. An estimated 85 percent were married and the mean gestation period was six to eight weeks. Another significant characteristic of these women was the small percentage of single-para patients relative to both the nulliparous and the two-parity patients; 35 percent had no children, 19 percent had one child, and 27 percent had two children. Only 20 percent had more than two children. Newspaper ads attracted about two-thirds of the abortion clients.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , India , Middle Aged , Parity , Pregnancy , Referral and Consultation , Social Class
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...