ABSTRACT
Background Anti-microbial resistance (AMR) is an ongoing epidemic contributing to extremely high healthcare costs and hospital admissions. Inappropriate dispensing of antibiotics is one of the root causes of AMR. Hence, our study aimed to assess antibiotic-dispensing patterns and AMR awareness among pharmacists from South-Central India. Methodology This cross-sectional observational study was conducted over a period of two months from June to July 2023. The pharmacies in urban and semi-urban areas of coastal and central districts of the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh were surveyed. Data were collected using a predesigned questionnaire for antibiotic-dispensing patterns and awareness of AMR, as approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Aster Ramesh Hospital, Vijayawada, India. The data were collected and analyzed descriptively by cross-tabulation. Results Among the 389 pharmacies that responded, 78% (n = 303) were dispensing antibiotics over the counter (OTC) and 22% (n = 86) were dispensing antibiotics only for valid prescriptions. It was found that antibiotics were dispensed OTC for common ailments such as the common cold, cough, sore throat, nasal congestion, fever, diarrhea, and urinary tract infections. As per the World Health Organization-recommended Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) criterion, antibiotics under the Watch group such as macrolides (azithromycin), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, levofloxacin, and ofloxacin) and third-generation cephalosporins (cefixime and cefpodoxime) were found to be widely dispensed OTC. The most common antibiotics dispensed OTC were azithromycin (54.1%), amoxicillin (47.5%), cefixime (40%), amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (15.2%), ofloxacin (13.5%), ciprofloxacin (10%), and doxycycline (6.6%). Among the OTC dispensers, 82.5% (n = 250) were unaware of AMR and 17.5% were partially aware. However, 57% (n = 49) were unaware of AMR and its effects, in pharmacies dispensing antibiotics for valid prescriptions. Conclusion Our findings aggregate evidence on the alarming trend of inappropriate antibiotic-dispensing patterns that may further exacerbate AMR. Strict regulatory enforcement and periodical monitoring to regulate antibiotic dispensing to control unethical dispensing are inevitably necessary.
ABSTRACT
Electric injuries are uncommon but can lead to numerous long-term complications as well as death. Occupational exposure is the most common cause of injury among the affected population. Both low-voltage and high-voltage electrocution are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with certain presentations are at a high risk of arrhythmia post-injury. Here, we discuss the presentation and management of high-voltage electrocution in a 35-year-old electrician.
ABSTRACT
Background: Endotracheal intubation to protect airway patency in critically ill patients with the use of videolaryngoscopes has been emerging and their expertise to handle is crucial. Our study focuses on the performance and outcomes of King Vision video laryngoscope (KVVL) in intensive care unit (ICU) compared to Macintosh direct laryngoscope (DL). Materials and methods: This comparative study was conducted by randomizing 143 critically ill patients in ICU into two groups: KVVL and Macintosh DL (n = 73; n = 70). The intubation difficulty was assessed by Mallampati score III or IV, apnea syndrome (obstructive), cervical spine limitation, opening mouth <3 cm, coma, hypoxia, anesthesiologist nontrained (MACOCHA) score. The primary endpoint was the glottic view measured by Cormack-Lehane (CL) grading. The secondary endpoints were a first-pass success, the time required for intubation, airway morbidities, and manipulations required. Results: The KVVL group showed the primary endpoint of significantly improved glottic visualization measured in terms of CL grading compared with the Macintosh DL group (p < 0.001). In the KVVL group, the first pass success rate was higher (95.7%) compared to the Macintosh DL group (81.4%) (p < 0.05). The time required for intubation in the KVVL group (28.77 ± 2.63 seconds) was significantly less compared with Macintosh DL (38.84 ± 2.72 seconds) group (p < 0.001). The airway morbidities observed were similar in both groups (p = 0.5) and the manipulation required for endotracheal intubation was significantly less (p < 0.05) in our KVVL group (16 cases; 23%) compared to the Macintosh DL group (8 cases; 10%). Conclusion: We found that the performance and outcomes of KVVL in intubating critically ill ICU patients were promising when handled by experienced operators who are experts in anesthesiology and airway management. How to cite this article: Dharanindra M, Jedge PP, Patil VC, Kulkarni SS, Shah J, Iyer S, et al. Endotracheal Intubation with King Vision Video Laryngoscope vs Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope in ICU: A Comparative Evaluation of Performance and Outcomes. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(2):101-106.
