The UK Mentoring and Support Programme (MSP) for those considering a career in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS). A review of a 'Register Interest in OMFS' website and the MSP as two key resources created by the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons to promote recruitment and retention (2008-2020).

In 2008, to create a rapid route for information transfer in relation training and recruitment for OMFS trainees, the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) created a website to "Register Your Interest in OMFS" (RYIO). From 2011 a Mentoring and Support Programme (MSP) was created to provide focussed guidance for trainees aiming for specialty training. This paper reviews the effectiveness and cost of these programmes. Between 2008 and 2020, 1744 individuals used RYIO on 2715 occasions. Of these registrations, 1772 were by dentists, 193 dental students, 589 doctors and 161 medical students. 2354 were from UK and Ireland and 351 from the rest of the world. 188 registrants subsequently became UK OMFS trainees or specialists. All registrants valued the information provided. In response to RYIO trainee feedback the new 'Taste of OMFS 2020' programme was created. The MSP was originally called the Junior Trainee Programme (JTP). The MSP scheme provides a layer of mentorship/support which runs parallel to the medical/dental training post or period of study. Of 180 members of MSP, 72 have obtained specialty training posts in OMFS. There are 88 current members. Full information is available on the BAOMS website www.baoms.org.uk. Reviewing both programmes, participant feedback is excellent with tangible results whilst cost effectiveness is high.

Workforce intelligence: what data do we need to collect to understand trends in substantive oral and maxillofacial surgery consultant posts? A retrospective review and plan for the future.

Understanding workforce pressures within surgery is an inexact science. This paper assembles evidence regarding oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) consultant appointments in the UK and plans for prospective data collection in the future. Information about the number of OMFS specialists joining the UK specialist list was obtained from the General Medical Council and compared to a database of substantive OMFS consultant posts. OMFS consultants were asked to contribute information about their training programmes and consultant appointments (date, interview experience, and sub-specialty interest). This information was collated on Excel© and analysed using WinStat©. Data on OMFS consultant posts advertised in 'NHS Jobs' and the British Medical Journal were collected. The mean (SD) number of specialists joining the specialist list per year is 24.1 (5.2) with a median of 24 and a range of 15 - 36. The number of trainees completing training and numbers joining the OMFS specialist list are in balance at present. The median delay between OMFS specialist listing and appointment as a consultant was 72 days and mean of 169 with the 25th centile of five days, standard deviation of 239 days and maximum of 5.2 years. Of those returning data, 135 (47%) candidates were the sole interviewee and 83 (29%) had one other candidate at their successful interview. The mean application ratio for each post was 1.9 and the median number of candidates was one, mean 1.6 and maximum candidates seven. About half of the posts were filled by trainees from their regional training rotation. Prospective data collection on advertised posts, interviews held, expected retirements/new posts, combined with a route for trainees approaching CCT to highlight their availability may streamline recruitment and allow a more rapid recognition of recruitment problems.

Duration of specialty training in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the United Kingdom for trainees joining the OMFS specialist list between 2002 and 2019.

INTRODUCTION: OMFS Specialty Training in the UK is usually 5 years and 'starts' at Specialty Training Year 3 (ST3). In 2007 a pilot of 'run-through' training started with Core Training (CT) posts linked to specialty training (ST1 posts). ST1 posts are usually 12 months but may be up to 24 months. METHOD: UK OMFS consultants joining the OMFS specialist list between 2002 and 2019 were contacted regarding their training. If their training was extended beyond the expected date of completion, they were asked to give a primary and secondary reason from a simplified list. Results were analysed with Winstat©. RESULTS: A total of 382 consultants were contacted, 325 responding (86%) and of these 290 were appointed at ST3 and their mean extension of training time was 0.63 years. For those 35 who were appointed to ST1, their training was on average 0.77 years longer than planned. Undertaking a Fellowship (33%) was the commonest reason for extension, followed by administrative delay (24%), unsuccessful attempts at the FRCS exam (12%) and training reasons (10%). Female trainees (n=37) spent on average 1.28 years longer than planned in training compared to male trainees (288 - 0.67 years). Gender differences were also present in the main reasons for extension with 12% of female respondents giving family reasons as the main cause, whereas only 2% of males gave this reason. Problems with training was the main cause for extension for 19% of females compared to 8% of males. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding factors which extend training and the length of these extensions could have the twin benefits of openness for new trainees and directing support to existing trainees. Differential attainment and Equality Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) are domains whose monitoring is required by the General Medical Council and undertaken by training authorities. The small numbers of trainees in OMFS programmes may not always allow training variance to be recognised.

First degree hotspots for OMFS recruitment 1967-2010: dental and medical schools where OMFS specialists and trainees were more likely to start their careers.

Evidence around careers shows that many surgeons were inspired early in their career and this was often based on their undergraduate experience. In this context we have reviewed the location of the first degrees of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) consultants and specialty trainees to look for any patterns or trends. It has been shown that there is variation across medical schools when core surgical trainee recruitment is analysed. To our knowledge no previous paper has undertaken a similar analysis of medical and dental schools in the context of OMFS. The first-degree universities of OMFS specialists and trainees were compiled from the Medical and Dental Register, tabulated and analysed. There were 680 entries in total with dates of graduation ranging from 1967 - 2010. The relative frequency of first-degree locations based on the number of current places for medical and dental students was calculated to aid comparison. There are 'hot-spots' from where many OMFS specialists originate and also universities that rarely or never produce OMF surgeons. Reviewing these figures in the context of the number of places available to students and against time, points to areas where OMFS appears to be promoted, and others were the specialty has a low impact. The University of London leads the way for both medicine and dentistry-first trainees by a considerable margin. Glasgow is the next most productive for dentistry and Nottingham for medicine. The 13 current medical schools from which no OMFS specialists or trainees have originated are Brighton, Cambridge, Anglia Ruskin, Exeter, Hull, Keele, Lancaster, Norwich, Plymouth, Swansea, University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), and Warwick. Other new medical schools are opening this year. There are opportunities for all OMFS units and training rotations to look at 'best practice' for OMFS recruitment and apply as many inspiring interventions as they can in their local medical and dental schools, and in foundation and core training programmes.

Changes in United Kingdom oral and maxillofacial surgical specialty trainees since 1995 - numbers, gender, first degrees, and nations of origin.

Training in UK surgery has changed dramatically since 1995, from a relative lack of structure to time-limited and highly documented programmes. Training in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) has shared these changes and included some significant changes of its own. Minutes from the OMFS Specialty Advisory Committee (SAC) were reviewed over the last 25 years to record the number and location of newly approved posts. The General Medicine Council's (GMC) OMFS specialist list in 2019 was combined with the records of OMFS specialists' dental qualifications held by the General Dental Council (GDC) and augmented from a database of OMFS trainees and consultants in the UK. Data on demographics, location, and nature of the first medical or dental degree were noted for analysis. A total of 691 OMFS specialists and trainees were identified from GMC, OMFS SAC and consultant databases. Of these, 12 consultants held only dental qualification/registration. First degree data could not be obtained for 12 specialists (all male). A further 20 OMFS specialists, whose training was outside the UK, were also excluded from further analysis. In 1995 there were 95 national training posts, by 2013 there were 150. Over the last quarter of a century, there has been an increase in medicine first trainees, an increase in female trainees and specialists, and a relative decrease in OMFS trainees from the Indian subcontinent. The varied origins of the OMFS workforce has contributed to greater diversity and inclusion within the specialty. In the UK, OMFS appears to have produced the correct number of specialists whilst maintaining a high standard of training. The next change in OMFS training programmes is to deliver The Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board's (PMETB) recommendations. As we move to achieve this it is imperative that as new doors open, we do not close others.

Legislation for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMFS) in the UK lags behind the patient care we provide: an illustrative timeline and recommendations for the future.

OMFS is the surgical specialty which bridges dentistry and medicine. As the specialty of OMFS emerged from the dental specialty of Oral Surgery during the 1980s the Dentists Act 1984, whose purpose included preventing medical practitioners providing unregulated general dental care, was published. In 2008 the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board (PMETB) review of training in OMFS concluded that dual qualification was essential and recommended that OMFS specialists should only be required to register with one regulator, the General Medical Council. For OMFS to continue to provide high quality patient care, and to help the GDC and GMC in their roles regulating our specialty, BAOMS has identified 5 areas for regulatory change: (1) All OMFS specialists should be able to practice the full curriculum of OMFS with only GMC registration if they wish to - this was recommendation 4 of the PMTEB Review of OMFS in 2008. (2) If an OMFS specialist or trainee is registered with both the GMC and GDC. (3) A Memorandum of Understanding between the GMC and GDC should prevent any fitness to practice concerns being processed by both regulators. (4) Dually registered OMFS specialists should be able to indicate that they have had "appraisal of the full scope of practice" to comply with GDC Continuing Professional Development (CPD) regulations. (5) Oral Surgery specialist list should retain Route 11 for OMFS specialists as the Oral Surgery Curriculum is entirely within the OMFS curriculum. Legislative changes may be the best route to deliver these recommendations. Until these changes happen, the GMC, GDC and BAOMS should work together in the best interests of patients.

The future of OMFS lies in creating pathways to implement the PMETB recommendations and inspiring our trainees. Enough time has been spent debating, we need to deliver!: Re: Newman L, Brown J, Kerawala C, et al. Our specialty. The future. Is the writing on the wall? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020 (online ahead of print).

The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) has been at the centre of the transition of our specialty in the UK from a branch of dentistry to one of the 10 UK surgical specialties. In this role it has, at different times, pushed boundaries against resistance from other specialties, and redirected the ambitions of the deputy chair of the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board (PMETB) review to produce recommendations that were exactly what OMFS needed. The editorial Our specialty. The future. Is the writing on the wall? is just the most recent iteration of half a century of internal debate. Whilst there are some issues with how the authors have presented recruitment data (their figures omit ST1 run-through and do not recognise that the same single, unfilled post may be present for two or more national selection rounds) their first paragraph A debate that we feel is long overdue presents the greatest concern. In this short communication, we illustrate that in the last 20 years the specialty has not been short of debate. In the absence of new and specific evidence that any other route forward would be supported by our national training committee (OMFS SAC), our regulator (GMC), the breadth of our specialty (including our current specialists and our current and future trainees) and, most importantly, would actually address our problems, we should avoid putting energy into an empty debate. Our focus should be on delivering the PMETB recommendations and inspiring our future trainees.

Infection and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), although initially believed to be exclusively associated with bisphosphonates, has been implicated in recent reports with additional drugs, especially the bone antiresorptive denosumab. The pathophysiology has not been fully elucidated, and no causal association between bone antiresorptive regimens and MRONJ has yet been established. However, reduced bone turnover and infection, an almost universal finding, are thought to be central to the pathogenesis of MRONJ. Both bisphosphonates and denosumab, through different pathways of action, significantly reduce the rate of bone turnover and potentially reduce the efficacy of the host defense against infection. Recent evidence questions the simplified etiology of low bone turnover causing MRONJ and offers evidence on the prominent role of infection instead. The management of MRONJ remains a significant clinical challenge, with little progress having been made on treatment. The aim of this article is to explore the current theories on the etiology of MRONJ and to emphasize the importance of infection in the development of this devastating pathology.

Simulation training for dental foundation in oral and maxillofacial surgery - a new benchmark.

Simulation training involves reproducing the management of real patients in a risk-free environment. This study aims to assess the use of simulation training in the management of acutely ill patients for those in second year oral and maxillofacial surgery dental foundation training (DF2s). DF2s attended four full day courses on the recognition and treatment of acutely ill patients. These incorporated an acute life-threatening events: recognition and treatment (ALERT(™)) course, simulations of medical emergencies and case-based discussions on management of surgical inpatients. Pre- and post-course questionnaires were completed by all candidates. A maximum of 11 DF2s attended the course. The questionnaires comprised 1-10 rating scales and Likert scores. All trainees strongly agreed that they would recommend this course to colleagues and all agreed or strongly agreed that it met their learning requirements. All DF2s perceived an improvement in personal limitations, recognition of critical illness, communication, assessing acutely ill patients and initiating treatment. All participants felt their basic resuscitation skills had improved and that they had learned new skills to improve delivery of safety-critical messages. These techniques could be implemented nationwide to address the more complex educational needs for DF2s in secondary care. A new benchmark for simulation training for DF2 has been established.

Use of interventional radiology in the management of mediastinitis of odontogenic origin.

Descending necrotising mediastinitis is a rare complication of odontogenic infection. The key to diagnosis is to maintain a high index of suspicion when antibiotics and adequate surgical drainage do not lead to resolution of symptoms. Open thoracic operation to drain mediastinal collections is potentially lethal and interventional radiological techniques are thought to reduce mortality. We report the use of interventional radiology in the diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of this condition and illustrate our experience with three case reports.

A form for referral of injured patients between maxillofacial and ophthalmology units.

We have designed a form to facilitate referral of injured patients between maxillofacial and ophthalmology units. This form improves communication, gives a written record of referral, and can be used for audit.

The CRABEL score--setting standards in maxillofacial medical note-keeping.

The CRABEL score (developed by Crawford, Beresford and Lafferty) was introduced for auditing medical note-keeping at Morriston Hospital in June 2001. Guidelines detailing the scoring system were issued to all clinicians in the maxillofacial unit. An auditor selected two sets of medical notes from each consultant's firm, giving an initial allocation of 100points/firm (50 points for each set of notes). The notes of the most recent in-patient admission were analysed using the CRABEL marking sheet to give a score out of 100 for each firm. The audit was repeated at 3-month-intervals. CRABEL scores within the maxillofacial unit improved from 70 to 97. The CRABEL score is simple, reliable and repeatable. It is a successful and objective measure for audit and for improvement in the quality of note-keeping. We propose that it be adopted in maxillofacial units throughout the United Kingdom.

Blood transfusion requirements in bimaxillary osteotomies.

The over-ordering of cross-matched blood to cover operations can result in blood shortages and is costly; it can never be free of risk. Current published guidelines recommend cross-matching 2 units of blood for bimaxillary orthognathic procedures with an additional 2 units if combined with a genioplasty. We reviewed the records of 115 consecutive cases of simultaneous bimaxillary osteotomies at Morriston Hospital over a 5-year period (January 1996 to December 2000). Ordering and use of blood were investigated and the cost analysed. Blood loss was minimised using a strategy of controlled moderate hypotension and meticulous haemostasis. Nine patients were given transfusions of blood but five of these were deemed inappropriate. No predisposing factors for transfusion were identified. We recommend that the tariff for ordering blood for bimaxillary osteotomies should be revised to a "group and save" with antibody screen, providing that a 30-min indirect antibody cross-match is available.

Titanium plate reconstruction of the osseous defect after harvest of a composite free flap using the deep circumflex iliac artery.

Hernia formation following harvest of bicortical iliac crest bone occurs infrequently as a late complication and may lead to chronic pain at the donor site and rarely to obstruction and strangulation of bowel. We describe the use of a custom-made titanium plate used to reconstruct the iliac donor site following harvest of a DCIA composite free flap. A pre-operative 3D CT and stereolithography model of the ilium are used to fabricate a titanium plate of the desired shape and size. This plate is used to reconstruct the donor site defect at the time of primary surgery. This technique may reduce late complications following DCIA composite free flap harvest.

A drill-free bone screw for intermaxillary fixation in military casualties.

Drill-free bone screws are a simple and quick method of establishing intermaxillary fixation requiring a minimum amount of specialist training or equipment. These screws offer significant advantages over other methods of intermaxillary fixation and are well suited for use in military casualties.

Ecstasy related periodontitis and mucosal ulceration -- a case report.

Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) more commonly known as 'Ecstasy' is a widely used recreational drug. The oral and systemic effects associated with its use have been well documented. This paper highlights a previously unreported complication of MDMA use on the oral mucosa. MDMA periodontitis is illustrated with a case report and the local oral and systemic effects of MDMA use outlined.