Health-related quality of life measures in routine clinical care: can FACT-fatigue help to assess the management of fatigue in cancer patients?

OBJECTIVES: Fatigue is the most common symptom reported by cancer patients. The inclusion of health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures in routine clinical care of cancer patients may improve the management of fatigue. The primary objective of this study is to provide evidence on the magnitude of change in fatigue subscale scores using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) that is clinically important. METHODS: Consecutive patients with advanced primary lung cancer attending a Canadian tertiary care cancer and, prior to undergoing palliative chemotherapy, were enrolled in the study. Patients completed a battery of questionnaires [FACT-F, Qualitative Patients Self-report of Fatigue Level (QPSRF)] at baseline, follow-up and 2 weeks after their final cycle of chemotherapy. Clinicians assessed the patients using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale at baseline and each follow-up visit. FACT-F change scores were computed as the mean change in score (end of study score minus baseline score). RESULTS: A total of 43 patients with mean age of 59 years were enrolled in the study. Results revealed a mean change in FACT-F subscale score of 5.0 (SE 1.06) for those who rated themselves as more tired, 1.28 (SE 1.00) for those who rated themselves as the same (no change), and -1.52 (SE 0.84) for those patients who rated themselves as less tired. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence on the magnitude of change in FACT-F score that is associated with the perception by patients of improvement in fatigue and magnitude of change in score that is associated with worsening in fatigue.

Hospital-to-community transitions. A bridge program for adolescent mental health patients.

Making the transition from the hospital to a community setting can be extremely challenging for patients with acute mental health conditions. Transitional services have been created to help patients overcome difficulties associated with this transition. Nurses frequently play an integral role in the success of these services. By providing patients with individualized support during such transitions, nurses act as clinical liaisons and directly contribute to an increase in positive patient and system-level outcomes. This article describes a transitional service called the Bridge Program, designed to help adolescents make a successful transition from the hospital to the community. An overview of the Bridge Program is provided, and the results of an evaluation of this program are presented. Results suggest that the Bridge Program contributes to a decrease in the length of hospital stays and improves continuity of care for patients and their families.

Ageism in rectal carcinoma? Treatment and outcome variations.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapies are associated with improved survival and local control rates. Concerns regarding adverse treatment effects tend to reduce administration in the elderly-the very population this disease affects. PURPOSE: To determine the extent to which age alters rectal cancer treatment and its outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using the population based provincial cancer registry, patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum diagnosed between 1991 and 1998 were identified. From this cohort, a random subsample of patients seen at the regional cancer center were selected for detailed analysis. Demographic and clinical data between the provincial cohort and the subsample were compared for homogeneity. Log rank tests and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were carried out on the subsample. RESULTS: The population cohort (n = 1979) and the subsample (n = 259) were similar in age, sex, and treatment distributions. Elderly patients (>/=75 yr) made up 23% of the rectal cancer population in Alberta. Age had a highly significant (p = 0.001) impact on whether patients received surgery alone or had surgery plus chemoradiotherapy. This corresponded to a considerable survival advantage for those elderly patients who did receive multimodality therapy (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The advantage of multimodality therapy in rectal cancer is confirmed in this populationbased study. Although a significant number of elderly patients are fit enough to tolerate major surgery they are being denied adjuvant therapies, presumably on the basis of potentially high treatment-related complication rates, with a subsequent reduction in survival. Strategies must be developed to ensure that maximum treatment benefit is obtained without increased harm in the elderly rectal cancer patient.