Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork ; 16(2): 4-11, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37265538

ABSTRACT

Background: Sleep disturbance is one of the key symptoms of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), which negatively affects the participants' quality of life. Craniosacral therapy (CST) is a gentle manual technique found to have significant effects on pain and function in chronic pain participants. However, limited evidence exists on its effectiveness on sleep quality in FMS participants. Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of CST on sleep quality in FMS participants. Setting: Outpatient physiotherapy department of a hospital in Bangalore. Participants: Participants diagnosed with FMS. Research Design: A pre/post pilot trial. Intervention: Once weekly, 45-minute sessions of CST for 12 weeks. The participants continued the standard medical care prescribed by the physician. Main Outcome Measure: The sleep quality was evaluated using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at baseline and 12 weeks. The data analysis was carried out using paired t test. Results: 9 out of 10 included participants completed the treatment and were included for analysis. The results of the paired t test showed significant improvement in the global PSQI score (p = .001, mean difference = 5.44±3.28, 95% CI = 2.92-7.97), as well as the 5 components of PSQI (p < .05). Conclusion: CST was feasible to deliver with high retention, acceptability, and minimal adverse events. It significantly improved sleep quality in FMS participants along with standard medical care. However, future studies with larger sample sizes and appropriate control groups are required to confirm the findings.

2.
J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect ; 12(1): 15, 2022 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35476156

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in the pediatric population and anterior uveitis is its commonest extra-articular manifestation. Typically the uveitis presents as chronic anterior uveitis and there is limited literature of the posterior segment manifestations of the disease. Similar to other vaccines, anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination that began as an urgent measure to control the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has not been without adverse events. We are reporting a 19-year-old Asian Indian female who was diagnosed and treated for JIA associated anterior uveitis that was unilateral and was under anti-inflammatory control but showed worsening of uveitis with posterior segment inflammation in both eyes following anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. CASE REPORT: A 19-year-old Asian Indian female with a history of juvenile idiopathic arthritis on treatment with methotrexate, presented with right eye chronic anterior uveitis with peripheral subclinical retinal vasculitis and macular edema which was brought under control following administration of adalimumab. She was inflammation free for 6 months until she received anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and developed new onset floaters in both eyes that were initially noted after the first dose and increased after the second dose. Clinical examination revealed presence of keratic precipitates and grade 1+ anterior chamber inflammation along with vitiritis in both eyes. Fundus fluorescein angiography revealed angiographically active retinal vasculitis without the presence of macular edema in both eyes. This was managed with a short course of topical difluprednate and continuation of systemic immunosuppressive therapy with adalimumab and methotrexate. CONCLUSION: JIA associated uveitis results from an autoimmune process which can be controlled with timely immunosuppressive treatment. It is important to be aware of the potential risk of flare up of uveitis with posterior segment manifestations following anti- SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

3.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 22(7): 1216-1225, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30977300

ABSTRACT

AIM: The use of healthcare resources by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients can be related to the presence of disease, comorbid conditions, use of steroids, and the combined use of immunosuppressants. This study evaluated the risk factors associated with infection and hospitalization in RA. METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional study enrolled 3247 RA subjects fulfilling the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria to examine the prevalence of hospitalization and episodes of documentable non-tubercular infections as a part of the "Karnataka rheumatoid arthritis comorbidity" study (KRAC). The study included 2081 subjects and 1166 were excluded due to incomplete data. Demographic, clinical and treatment variables were collected, and the events related to infections and hospitalization were extracted from the medical records. Comparative analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed. RESULTS: Around 22% of the subjects had hospitalizations and 2.9% had infections. Infections were pertaining to dental (1.3%), urinary tract (1.6%) and candidiasis (0.2%). Skin- and soft tissue-related infections were found in 1.8% and 0.3% of patients, respectively. Increased need of hospitalization in RA patients was associated with advanced age (≥60 years), lower education, family income, and longer duration of RA. Presence of comorbidity, usage of three or more disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and family income influenced the likelihood of infection. Dental infections were less likely in working subjects and more likely in patients with increased disease duration, higher family income, comorbidities and those between the age group 40-59 years. Urinary tract infection was associated with DMARD usage. CONCLUSION: Patient-specific risk factors should be considered to improve treatment strategies and to reduce the risk of infection and hospitalization in RA patients.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Hospitalization , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Opportunistic Infections/therapy , Social Determinants of Health , Socioeconomic Factors , Steroids/adverse effects , Adult , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , Opportunistic Infections/immunology , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors
4.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 22(2): 280-287, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30168281

ABSTRACT

AIM: Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major adverse events of concern associated with the use of biologics for managing autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). The study presents the data on incidence of TB in relation to biologic used, screening test and TB prophylaxis in a real-world setting. METHODS: The cross-sectional, observational, retrospective study was conducted across 12 centres in Karnataka, India. The study included patients receiving biologics therapy for AIRDs, established based on the respective diagnostic criteria. The development of TB after receiving biologic therapy and other clinical variables and the predictability of the test performed for latent TB were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-five AIRDs patients with an average age of 41 years were initiated on biologic therapy. Twenty-one patients were latent TB positive and were given antitubercular prophylaxis, prior to biologics treatment. During follow-up, seven patients belonging to the negative test group (n = 174) developed TB. The negative predictive values noted for Mantoux test (n = 120) and quantiFERON TB gold test (n = 178) were 96.52% and 96.25%, respectively. Patients on anti-tumor necrosis factor were more likely to develop TB. Presence of comorbidities and steroid use increased the likelihood of developing TB by 1.5 and 4.6 times, respectively. CONCLUSION: Close monitoring of patients receiving biologics is essential for early identification of adverse events, especially in test negative patients. Prophylaxis can effectively reduce the risk of developing TB in patients positive for screening.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Biological Products/adverse effects , Latent Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Autoimmune Diseases/epidemiology , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Incidence , India/epidemiology , Latent Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Latent Tuberculosis/immunology , Latent Tuberculosis/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Opportunistic Infections/diagnosis , Opportunistic Infections/immunology , Opportunistic Infections/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Rheumatic Diseases/diagnosis , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Rheumatic Diseases/immunology , Risk Factors , Steroids/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/immunology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...