Pre-dialysis levels of inflammation and endotoxin in people receiving hemodialysis are not associated with blood pressure variability.

There are multiple risk factors for inflammation in dialysis. One potential cause is the presence of circulating levels of Gram-negative bacteria-derived endotoxin which is a strong inducer of inflammation. Gut-associated endotoxin may enter the circulation via a defective blood-gut barrier during episodes of hypotension or reduced perfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 165 patients receiving outpatient-based hemodialysis in a facility (FHD) or at home (HHD), were studied. Levels of inflammation were quantified by developing an inflammatory score derived from the measurement of pro-inflammatory cytokines, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6). Intradialytic blood pressure (BP) variability and hypotension events were recorded. This included the final session of dialysis, at the commencement of which the blood samples were drawn, as well as the five preceding sessions. RESULTS: The median inflammatory score was 2 (range 0 - 3), and 30% of patients had an inflammatory score of three suggesting significant levels of inflammation. Only 8.5% had an inflammatory score of 0. Endotoxin was measured in all participants and was only positive in N = 3. The mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 134 ± 20 mmHg and the BP variability was 11.7 ± 3.5. In a multivariable ordinal regression model, a higher inflammatory score was significantly associated with younger age (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.95 - 0.99, p = 0.03), higher ultrafiltration volume (OR 1.62, CI 1.04 - 2.54, p = 0.03) and lower body mass index (OR 0.9, CI 0.86 - 0.96, p = 0.01). There was no association between inflammatory score and dialysis modality, access type, kidney replacement therapy (KRT), BP variability, or endotoxin. Endotoxin was detected in only 3 of 165 patients and was not associated with inflammation. CONCLUSION: Pre-dialysis levels of inflammation are prevalent in the hemodialysis population after the long break but are not related to intradialytic BP variability or hypotension in the preceding 2 weeks. However, endotoxemia is uncommon and unlikely to be a significant driver of inflammation.

Effect of a Hemodialysis Session on Markers of Inflammation and Endotoxin.

Background: People receiving hemodialysis (HD) treatment have higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, ascribed to an increased prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. However, the role of nontraditional risk factors, such as inflammation, has become increasingly recognized. The origin of this inflammation remains elusive and one putative cause is elevated levels of circulating bacterial endotoxin. Methods: In this study, serum concentrations of endotoxin and inflammatory biomarkers, including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1ß (IL1ß), ferritin and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), were measured in 30 adults receiving HD and 10 healthy individuals without kidney disease. In people receiving HD, samples were collected immediately before dialysis (preHD), after dialysis (postHD), and 48 hours after (postHD48hrs). Results: Endotoxin was detectable in only 1 of 90 samples analyzed. There were no significant differences in serum hsCRP, IL1ß, and IL6 levels, before and after dialysis. Serum TNF levels decreased significantly from 30.9 (8.0, 39.5) pg/mL preHD to 13.9 (8.5, 17.3) pg/mL post-HD (p=0.002) and then increased back to 27.37 (14.5, 35) pg/mL 2 days later (p < 0.001). Ferritin increased from 1153 ng/mL (782, 1458) preHD to 1313 ng/mL (657, 1638) post HD (p < 0.001) and then decreased back to 1186 ng/mL (754, 1597) (p=0.66) postHD48hrs. Compared to controls, people receiving HD had significantly elevated levels of hsCRP [6.16 mg/L (2.1, 16.8) vs. 1.1 mg/L (0.81, 3.63) p=0.015], IL1ß [1.5 pg/mL (0.05, 2.51) vs. 0.5 pg/mL (1.81, 2.95) p ≤ 0.001], and ferritin [1153 (782, 1458) vs. 132.9 (111, 257) ng/mL p ≤ 0.001], but comparable levels of in IL6 [6.15 pg/mL (4.82, 9.12) vs. 7.49 pg/mL (4.56, 10.39), p=0.77] and TNF [27.35 pg/mL ± 17.48 vs. 17.87 pg/mL ± 12.28, p < 0.12]. In conclusion, people on HD have elevated levels of inflammatory biomarkers, which are not associated with endotoxemia (which is rare) or the dialysis procedure.

Azathioprine hypersensitivity syndrome: report of two cases.

Azathioprine hypersensitivity syndrome is a rare but potentially severe side effect of azathioprine use. It has a variable and non-specific presentation making it difficult to distinguish from sepsis or disease relapse. High clinical suspicion is therefore required for recognition and prompt cessation of azathioprine for symptom resolution. Herewith two cases of severe azathioprine hypersensitivity syndrome are described, one in association with Sweet syndrome. Both presented with vague symptoms 2 weeks after commencing azathioprine for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis. The differentials of sepsis and disease relapse were considered prior to cessation of azathioprine which resulted in a dramatic improvement in both cases. These cases highlight the diagnostic challenge azathioprine hypersensitivity syndrome presents. It should be suspected when there is a temporal relationship to drug initiation, with absence of infection or serological evidence of disease relapse.

Establishing a stable platform for the measurement of blood endotoxin levels in the dialysis population.

BACKGROUND: Gram-negative lipopolysaccharides are potent inducers of inflammation and have been shown to be present in patients with end-stage kidney disease. There are a variety of different manufacturers and assay types to quantify endotoxin levels; however, there is no standard methodology to demonstrate its presence in plasma. METHODS: A control group consisting of haemodialysis and non-kidney disease was selected. Five sets of experiments were conducted to try and ascertain the best platform for plasma endotoxin testing. This included: testing of blank tubes; the effects of freezing, thawing and storage on recovery; the effect of different buffers; use of an endpoint assay and comparison of turbidimetric vs. chromogenic kinetic assays. RESULTS: No endotoxin was detected in the blood collection tubes. Freezing and thawing per se did not affect spike recovery rates. However, the sequencing of sample dilution relative to freezing had a significant effect on endotoxin recovery. Buffers increased spike recovery at all levels of dilution. No endotoxin was demonstrated with either the turbidimetric or chromogenic kinetic assay at two different dilutions in the haemodialysis controls. The endpoint assay at a 1:5 dilution did not achieve a valid standard curve. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study suggest that, when testing plasma samples, either a turbidimetric or chromogenic assay may be used and should be diluted with appropriate buffers to achieve optimal recovery. Studies looking to quantify the presence of plasma endotoxin need to internally validate their assays and specify their validation findings in their results.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Melioidosis in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis in the Tropics? One Size Does Not Fit All.

Melioidosis has a high case fatality rate and is more common in patients with chronic kidney disease. Some authors recommended trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) prophylaxis for all hemodialysis (HD) patients during the wet season in melioidosis-endemic regions. Historical data were reviewed to determine if TMP/SMX prophylaxis was warranted in the HD population of Far North Queensland, Australia. Between 1997 and 2017, there were 242 culture-confirmed cases of melioidosis in the region, three (1.2%) occurred in HD patients; all survived without intensive care support. During the study period, there were 843 HD patients in the region with 3,024 cumulative patient years of risk. Even assuming 100% efficacy, it would have been necessary to prescribe TMP/SMX for 1,008 patient years to prevent one case of melioidosis. Given the significant additional cost and potentially life-threatening side effects of TMP/SMX therapy, clinicians should review the local epidemiology of melioidosis before the implementation of universal TMP/SMX prophylaxis in their HD population.

Mini review: A unique case of crescentic C3 glomerulonephritis.

Kidney involvement is an under-recognized complication of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. They occur in a variety of mechanisms and differ widely in their clinical presentation. We take this opportunity to report a case of a 65 year-old man who developed a rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis within days after completing his first cycle of R-CHOP (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisolone) chemotherapy for newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. He was odematous, hypertensive, oliguric with nephrotic range proteinuria and an active urine sediment. A renal biopsy showed a crescentic C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) with no evidence endocapillary or mesangial hypercellularity. He was promptly treated with immunosuppression and dialysis, with resumption of his chemotherapy. Genetic testing on complement proteins revealed a homozygous deletion spanning the CFHR1 and CFHR3 genes. Crescentic C3GN is a rare form of kidney injury, and this is the first known case of lymphoma-associated kidney involvement manifesting as C3GN. This article explores the possible mechanism of disease and reviews the literature of lymphoma-related kidney disease.

Acute irreversible oxalate nephropathy in a lung transplant recipient treated successfully with a renal transplant.

We report a 29 year old male cystic fibrosis patient with end stage lung disease and normal renal function who underwent a sequential double lung transplant. Medical history included: an ileal resection and pancreatic exocrine dysfunction. The postoperative period was complicated with haemorrhage and repeat surgery, requiring multiple blood transfusions and extensive antibiotic cover. Pancreatic supplements were interrupted. Acute renal failure attributed to haemodynamically-mediated acute tubular necrosis was managed expectantly. He remained dialysis dependent 8 weeks post surgery and was maintained on triple immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate and prednisolone. A DTPA study was consistent with ATN. Renal biopsy revealed features consistent with tubular injury due to acute oxalate nephropathy (AON). Further biochemical characterization excluded primary hyperoxaluria but confirmed increased 24 hour urinary oxalate. He was maintained on enhanced frequency HDF and subsequently received an uncomplicated live related renal transplant 10 months post lung transplant with only additional basiliximab. Calcium carbonate was continued to manage post transplant hyperoxaluria and an early renal biopsy excluded recurrent oxalate injury. Enteric hyperoxaluria due to malabsorption in patients with CF especially with ileal resection, in addition to loss of gut Oxalobacter formigenes due to prolonged antimicrobials, increases the risk of AON. Increased awareness of this condition and screening prior to lung transplant is recommended.

Serum iron markers are inadequate for guiding iron repletion in chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Iron (Fe) overload may complicate parenteral Fe therapy used to enhance the efficacy of erythropoietic-stimulating agents in the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease. However, serum Fe markers are influenced by inflammation or malignancy and may not accurately reflect the amount of body Fe. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We studied the relationship between parenteral Fe therapy, conventional serum Fe markers, and liver iron concentration (LIC) measured using magnetic resonance R2 relaxometry (FerriScan) in 25 Fe-deficient predialysis chronic kidney disease patients before and 2 and 12 weeks after single high-dose intravenous Fe and in 15 chronic hemodialysis patients with elevated serum ferritin (>500 µg/L). RESULTS: In predialysis patients, there was strong dose dependency between the administered Fe dose and changes in LIC at weeks 2 and 12; however, no dose dependency between Fe dose and changes in ferritin or transferrin saturation (TSAT) were observed. In hemodialysis patients, LIC correlated with the cumulative Fe dose and duration of dialysis but not with current ferritin or TSAT. The cumulative Fe dose remained a significant independent predictor of LIC in a multiple regression model. Two dialysis patients who received >6 g parenteral Fe had substantially elevated LIC >130 µmol/g, which is associated with hemochromatosis. CONCLUSIONS: In Fe-deficient predialysis patients, intravenous Fe therapy is associated with increases in LIC unrelated to changes in conventional Fe markers. In hemodialysis patients, TSAT and ferritin are poor indicators of body Fe load, and some patients have LICs similar to those found in hemochromatosis.