The use of a prosthetic inlay resurfacing as a salvage procedure for a failed cartilage repair.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to describe the clinical and radiographical outcome of the HemiCAP(®) resurfacing system as a salvage treatment for a failed index cartilage procedure. METHODS: Fourteen patients were treated consecutively and clinically prospectively followed for a mean period of 26.1 ± 12.8 months. All patients were previously treated for their cartilage lesion. Radiographical data were analysed based on the Kellgren and Lawrence system. RESULTS: The patients involved in this study demonstrated a gradual clinical improvement in time. However, radiographically significant osteoarthritic changes were observed during the follow-up period. The position of the HemiCAP(®) resurfacing system was adequate in all cases, and no signs of loosening were observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The HemiCAP(®) resurfacing system is feasible as a salvage treatment for a failed index cartilage procedure and resulted in a gradual clinical improvement. However, the favourable clinical outcome was not confirmed by the radiographical findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Patellar tilt and thickness do not influence postoperative flexion in a high-flex design total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this short-term study was to determine whether patellar thickness and tilt influence the postoperative flexion in a high-flex design total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Between 2007 and 2009, 106 patients underwent surgery for TKA using rotating platform flex prosthesis (DePuy, Warsaw, Ind). All of them were suffering from end-stage osteoarthritis. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 12 months of follow-up. Maximum active, non-weight-bearing flexion was the primary outcome parameter. Standard standing antero-posterior and lateral weight-bearing radiographs were made. The patellofemoral joints were evaluated in skyline views taken with the knees at approximately 60° of flexion. Patellar thickness, patellar tilt, Caton-Deschamps indices and lower limb alignment were measured. RESULTS: The mean flexion observed before surgery was 125° ± 15° and after 1 year was 128° ± 13°. The mean patellar thickness preoperatively was 24.5 ± 2.9 and 25.8 ± 3.2 mm at 12 months after surgery. The mean patellar tilt before the procedure was 2.9° ± 4.1° and after 12 months of follow-up was -0.8° ± 5.0°. The mean preoperative hip-knee-ankle was 2.6° ± 6.2°. No significant correlation was found between postoperative patellar tilt and thickness and postoperative flexion (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Patellar tilt and thickness after TKA are factors that depend on the surgery. The resection of the patella can influence both patellar thickness and patellar tilt. By developing adequate surgical instruments, it would be possible to avoid the occurrence of an exaggerated patellar tilt or a major difference in patellar thickness. However, these two factors did not seem to influence the postoperative flexion in a high-flex design TKA, which can be seen as one of the most important outcome factors after TKA.