A pharmacokinetic study comparing the biosimilar HEC14028 and Dulaglutide (Trulicity®) in healthy Chinese subjects.

This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety, and immunogenicity of the biosimilar HEC14028 compared to reference Trulicity® (dulaglutide) in healthy male Chinese subjects. This study was a single-center, randomized, open, single-dose, parallel-controlled comparative Phase I clinical trial, including a screening period of up to 14 days, a 17-day observation period after administration, and a 7-day safety follow-up period. A total of 68 healthy male subjects were randomly assigned (1:1) to the test group (HEC14028) and the reference group (dulaglutide) (single 0.75 mg abdominal subcutaneous dose). The primary objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of HEC14028 and compare the pharmacokinetic similarities between HEC14028 and dulaglutide. The primary PK endpoints were maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the blood concentration-time curve from zero time to the estimated infinite time (AUC0-∞). The study results showed that HEC14028 and dulaglutide were pharmacokinetically equivalent: 90% confidence interval (CI) of Cmax and AUC0-∞ geometric mean ratios were 102.9%-122.0% and 97.1%-116.9%, respectively, which were both within the range of 80.00%-125.00%. No grade 3 or above treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), TEAEs leading to withdrawal from the trial, or TEAEs leading to death were reported in this study. Both HEC14028 and dulaglutide showed good and similar safety profiles, and no incremental immunogenicity was observed in subjects receiving HEC14028 and dulaglutide.

A Bioequivalence Study of Ezetimibe/Rosuvastatin Fixed Dose Combination (10 mg/10 mg) Versus the Individual Formulations Taken Concomitantly.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the bioequivalence of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin fixed dose combination compared to the concomitant administration of individual formulations (ezetimibe and rosuvastatin) in Chinese healthy subjects under fasting conditions. METHODS: This was a phase I, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, crossover study conducted in healthy Chinese participants under fasting conditions. Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ from test and individual reference formulations were evaluated to assess bioequivalence. The safety assessments included adverse events (AEs)/treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), potential clinically significant abnormalities (PCSAs) in vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram (12-ECG), and clinical laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Of the 68 subjects enrolled, 67 were treated. Systemic exposure to rosuvastatin based on Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ was similar in both treatments, with respective arithmetic values 12.4 ng/ml, 117 ng·h/mL, and 120 ng·h/mL for test formulation and 12.7 ng/ml, 120 ng·h/mL, and 123 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. Similarly, systemic exposure to unconjugated ezetimibe was 4.14 ng/ml, 89.7 ng·h/mL, and 102 ng·h/mL for the test formulation and 3.80 ng/ml, 89.7 ng·h/mL, and 102 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. Systemic exposure to total ezetimibe was 70.5 ng/ml, 664 ng·h/mL, and 718 ng·h/mL for test formulation and 60.2 ng/ml, 648 ng·h/mL, and 702 ng·h/mL for reference formulations. The point estimates for rosuvastatin unconjugated ezetimibe and total ezetimibe were in the acceptable range of 0.80-1.25. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Fixed dose combination of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin (10 mg/10 mg) achieved bioequivalence with reference to commercial tablets. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTR20202108.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of recombinant, fully human anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody (MW031) versus denosumab in Chinese healthy subjects: a single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: MW031 is a biosimilar candidate of denosumab (Prolia®). This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of MW031 to denosumab in healthy Chinese participants. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled, single-dose trial, participants were given 60 mg MW031 (N = 58) or denosumab (N = 61) by subcutaneous injection and observed for 140 days. The primary endpoint was the bioequivalence of PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-∞), and secondary endpoints including PD parameter, safety, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: A comparison of main PK parameters showed that the geometric mean ratios (GMR) (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) of AUC0-∞ and Cmax for MW031 over denosumab were 105.48% (98.96%, 112.43%) and 98.58% (92.78%, 104.75%), respectively. The inter-CV values of AUC0-∞ and Cmax for MW031 ranged from 19.9% to 23.1%. PD parameter (sCTX) in the MW031 and denosumab groups were similar, and the positivity rates of immunogenicity were 0% in both groups. This study also showed similar safety profiles in both groups, and there were no drug-related, high-incidence and previously unreported adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: This trial confirmed similar pharmacokinetic profiles of MW031 and denosumab in healthy male participants, and pharmacodynamic profile, immunogenicity and safety were comparable for both drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04798313; CTR20201149.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety Study of HN0037, a Novel Anti-Human Herpes Simplex Virus Inhibitor, in Healthy Volunteers.

HN0037 is a helicase-primase inhibitor developed to treat herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of HN0037, following oral administration in healthy volunteers. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 study comprised two parts. In part 1, a single escalating dose of 10, 30, 60, 120, 200, 300, and 400 mg was assessed, and the food effect was evaluated in the 200-mg cohort. In part 2, a multiple dose evaluation involving 30 and 100 mg once a day was conducted for 14 days. Following single oral doses, the systemic exposure of HN0037 increased in a proportional manner over the lower dose range (10-120 mg) and in a subproportional manner over the higher dose range (200-400 mg). Following multiple oral doses, significant drug accumulation of systemic exposure was found at steady state, and the half-life ranged 50.4-61.0 h. The food effect study results indicated that a high-fat meal had a marginal impact on HN0037's pharmacokinetics. No differences were observed in the incidence of adverse events between HN0037 and placebo groups in either study. These results demonstrate that HN0037 is safe and well-tolerated, supporting further clinical development.

The similarity of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity between recombinant fully human anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody injection (MW032) and denosumab (Xgeva®) in healthy Chinese subjects: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-controlled clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and immunogenicity between MW032 (denosumab biosimilar) and Xgeva® (denosumab) in healthy Chinese subjects. STUDY DESIGN: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-controlled design study, 120 healthy male subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive a single dose subcutaneous injection of 120 mg MW032 or Xgeva®, with an observation period of 161 days. The primary endpoint was the bioequivalence of PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t), and secondary endpoints including PD parameters, safety, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve subjects completed the study, including 56 subjects in each group. The geometric mean ratio and 90% CI for AUC0-t and Cmax were 1.117 (1.034, 1.205) and 1.060 (0.984, 1.142), respectively, which were both within the equivalence interval (0.8, 1.25). The inter-subject variation ranged from 21.37% to 27.37%. The PD parameters between MW032 and Xgeva® were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in the positive incidence of anti-drug antibody test between the two groups. Both MW032 and Xgeva® appeared to be well-tolerated and no Grade 3 or above serious adverse reactions occurred. The adverse reactions observed in the study were reported for denosumab generally. Moreover, there were no high-incidence or previously unreported adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: This study evidenced that the PK profiles of MW032, a denosumab biosimilar, and Xgeva® were bioequivalent. We also found that the PDs, safety, and immunogenicity were similar between the two drugs. Therefore, our results supported the next confirmatory studies for the development of MW032.

Implementation of a Reference-Scaled Average Bioequivalence Approach for Highly Variable Acetylsalicylic Acid in Fixed-Dose Combination with Clopidogrel Versus Enteric Aspirin in Chinese Subjects Under Fasting Conditions: A Phase 1, Open-Label, Randomized, Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: Dual antiplatelet therapy, aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor, is recommended to prevent thrombotic complications of acute coronary syndrome. Clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid combination is the most commonly used dual antiplatelet therapy recommended by international guidelines and in Chinese clinical practice. Poor adherence to dual antiplatelet therapy or premature interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy is an important contributor to cardiovascular mortality and lethal cardiovascular events. Clopidogrel + acetylsalicylic acid fixed-dose combination enhances adherence to dual antiplatelet therapy. Herein, we aimed to evaluate bioequivalence of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel in fixed-dose combination compared with simultaneous administration of their individual formulations in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions. METHODS: This was a randomized, single-center, open-label, three-sequence, three-period, two-treatment, crossover study with a washout period of 10 days conducted in healthy Chinese volunteers. Subjects were randomized to receive Co-Plavix® (test formulation- fixed-dose combination of 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid and 75 mg clopidogrel) once and reference formulations (coadministration of individual formulations of 100 mg acetylsalicylic acid and 75 mg clopidogrel) twice during the study period. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed for acetylsalicylic acid, its metabolite salicylic acid, clopidogrel, and its metabolite SR26334. As acetylsalicylic acid shows high intrasubject variability, the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach was implemented for acetylsalicylic acid analysis, while bioequivalence of clopidogrel was assessed using the average bioequivalence method. Point ratios and confidence intervals (CIs) for AUC, AUClast, and Cmax for acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel were calculated. RESULTS: In total, 171 healthy subjects were enrolled in this study. Subjects were randomized and 170 subjects were treated with test or reference formulation; 164 subjects completed the study. Regarding acetylsalicylic acid exposure, as reference within-subject standard deviation (SDW) was at least 0.294 for acetylsalicylic acid Cmax, AUClast, and AUC, the RSABE analysis method was used to assess bioequivalence for all three parameters. The point estimates were within the 0.80-1.25 range (1.19, 1.09, and 1.04, respectively), and upper one-sided 95% CIs of scaled average bioequivalence metric were at most 0 (- 0.30, - 0.14, and - 0.10, respectively). Thus, bioequivalence was demonstrated with acetylsalicylic acid. Bioequivalence was also achieved with clopidogrel as the 90% CIs for geometric mean ratios of clopidogrel Cmax, AUClast, and AUC were within the bioequivalence range (0.80-1.25). CONCLUSION: Application of the reference-scaled average bioequivalence approach to evaluate bioequivalence of acetylsalicylic acid in Chinese male and female healthy volunteers under fasting conditions demonstrated bioequivalence of test and reference formulations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTR20181695.