[Evaluation of the appropriateness of public hospital use using AEP, Disease Staging, and other DRG-based criteria (essential levels of care--Italian LEA): results and degree of agreement among the different methodologies]. / Valutazione dell'appropriatezza organizzativa degli ospe- dali pubblici abruzzesi tramite PRUO, Disease Staging, e mediante il calcolo dei DRG ad alto rischio di inappropria- tezza secondo i "nuovi" e "vecchi" LEA: risultati e grado di concordanza tra le diverse metodiche.

Currently, more than one instrument has been found to be reliable and valid for the assessment of hospital admission appropriateness. However; data on the level of agreement among these methodologies are extremely scarce. The study was aimed at evaluating whether the percentages of organizational (in)appropriateness resulting from some of the most diffused instruments (Italian Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol--AEP/PRUO; Disease Staging; Essential Levels of Care--LEA, version 2001 and 2008) are substantially concordant, or they largely depend upon the methodology. For each public hospital of Abruzzo, Italy, the amount of inappropriateness has been computed using six indicators: inappropriate days of care (PRUO1); totally inappropriate admissions (PRU02); early admissions DRGs according to the first Law on Italian LEA (LEA01); admissions assigned to one of the 108 potentially inappropriate DRGs according to the second Law on Italian LEA, currently inactive (LEA08). The sample was composed by all ordinary admissions made in 2006 in the Region, with the exception of PRUO indicators, which were based upon the manual revision of 2% of all admissions that could be assessed using PRUO methodology. We found a good correlation among most indicators based upon administrative discharge data (DS1, DS2 and LEA01), whereas the results obtained using PRUO and new LEA (LEA08) were discordant, and marked differences were observed also between the two PRUO indicators. Although the limitations of the study permit only preliminary conclusions, in future appropriateness evaluations it may be reasonable to use more than one indicator--allowing the creation of combined scores--and rank hospitals in large categories--avoiding excessively precise scores--as such rankings might relevantly differ depending upon the used instrument.

[Different use/abuse patterns (overweight/obesity, alcohol, smoking, drugs, cannabis, opiates, cocaine) according to job category. Results of a survey on 4024 young workers from Abruzzo, Italy: the Valentino Study]. / Gli abusi farmacologici, alimentari, da alcool, fumo e droga nelle diverse categorie professionali. Risultati di un'indagine conoscitiva su 4024 giovani lavoratori abruzzesi: il Progetto Valentino.

Using a multidisciplinary questionnaire containing items from previously validated instruments (i.e. CAGE), during the year 2007 a survey (Valentino Project) was carried out on 4024 young workers (18-35 y) from Abruzzo, Italy to investigate the prevalence of use/abuse of alcohol, food, smoking, and drugs in different types of job categories, and to evaluate the potential association between occupational class and type of use/abuse. With the exception of cannabis use/abuse (13.5%), the prevalence of incorrect behaviours was higher than the young-adult general population (workers and non-workers) from Central-South Italy: overweight/obesity = 30.8%; current smoking = 45.7%; alcohol addiction = 17.3%; use/abuse of psychotropic legal drugs = 4.7%; cocaine = 4.5%; opiates = 1.0%; > 1 illegal drug (multiple abuse) = 3.9%. This negative scenario is accentuated by a probable > or = 25% underestimation of illegal drug use/abuse, and because drug use/abuse is inversely associated with age. Using logistic regression analyses (controlling for age, gender marital status, education, job-strain, self-reported health, and all other types of use/abuse), a significant independent association was found for the first time between specific types of use/abuse and some job categories (i.e. cocaine for traders/consultants; legal psychoactive drugs and cannabis for unqualified professions such as itinerants or precarious workers; smoking for Call-Center operators; overweight/obesity for farmers/artisans). These findings should be used to maximize the efficacy of substance use/abuse preventive strategies, which could be more precisely targeted to different professions, and raise the need to control for job category in future multivariate analyses investigating substance use/abuse predictors.

[Evaluation of the appropriateness of public hospital use using AEP in the Abruzzo Region of Italy: results by hospital and ward, main predictors and potential implications]. / Valutazione dell'appropriatezza dei ricoveri ospedalieri pubblici nella regione abruzzo tramite PRuo: risultati per presidio e disciplina, principali predittori e potenziali implicazioni.

In the context of a wide healthcare system reorganization, the Abruzzo Region of Italy used the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) to carry out a systematic evaluation of the appropriateness of the admissions performed during 2006 in all public hospitals. After specific training courses, a sample representative of all ordinary admissions was assessed twice: first by regional investigators (external assessment) then by the local personnel (internal assessment). Random-effect logistic regression was used to evaluate potential inappropriateness predictors. On a total of 13081 hospital days (2393 hospitalizations), 39.7% (95% Confidence interval: 38.9%-40.6%) were inappropriate at the regional assessment; 39.5% at the internal assessment, with high correlation between the two controls (K = 0.73). Another 10.4% of admissions, excluded by the evaluation, was assigned to DRGs at high risk of inappropriateness and should be considered. In single hospitals, the inappropriateness ranged between 17.9% and 57.9%, with large variation across wards. Additional significant predictors of inappropriateness were the day and hour of admission and hospital size, with lower inappropriateness in bigger ones. In 2006, there was a large degree of hospital misuse in public hospitals in the Abruzzo Region. The approach used in the survey may have contributed to the drastic reduction of the number of ordinary admissions observed in the Region between 2006 and 2007.

[Regional epidemiology of chronic nephropathies: referral to nephrologist and initiation of dialysis]. / Epidemiologia regionale/locale delle nefropatie croniche: profili di "referral" ambulatoriale e inizio dialisi.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of pre-dialysis chronic nephropathies (CN) in well-defined contexts is essential to prevent delays in delivering appropriate care. METHODS: The registration of consecutive patients in seven out-patient and four in-patient dialysis centers of Basilicata (2001) formed a retrospective study on clinical charts and dialysis registers integrated with ad hoc data. RESULTS: Newly observed outpatients (I) numbered 328; prevalent patients (P) numbered 343. The age and gender of both I and P patients was similar (males: 60%, age media: 67 yr). In 316 I patients with creatinine (mean Cr: 2.3 mg/dL), the mean filtration rate (GFR) was 40.9 mL/min/1.73 m2: 13.6% were in advanced stage (S5) of GFR (<15 mL/min), 23.4% in S4/severe (15-29), 45.6% in S3/moderate (30-59), 10.8% in S2/mild (60-89), and 6.6% in S1 (>90). When compared to I patients, P patients had a mean GFR of 35.0 mL/min; S4+S5 was 48% (vs. 37%); hypertension 68% (vs. 58%); vasculopathies 15% (vs. 10%); coronary disease 10% (vs. 4%); erythropoietin 13% (vs. 7%); and low-protein diet 34% (vs. 20%) (p<0.01). Of 316 I patients, 117 in S5+S4 ('late referral' 37%) had a (mean) GFR of 18.4 mL/min, Cr 3.7 mg/dL, and were aged 70 yrs (vs. 64 yrs for 'early referral'). Of 53 new patients on dialysis, 26 (49%) were seen for the first time <6 months prior to starting (mean age: 71 yr vs. 62; female 58% vs. 26%; complications 50% vs. 17%). CONCLUSIONS: In this population, age-related factors are associated with late referral. Although sociodemographic variables depend on local contexts, these results are consistent with similar international studies. Social and cultural factors may influence physicians to postpone referring patients to a nephrologist, independently of clinical conditions.

[The need for integrated care of patients with chronic nephropathies: the epidemiology of 'late referral']. / Epidemiologia dei bisogni di gestione integrata: il "late referral" in Nefrologia.

BACKGROUND: The recent need for information has prompted this collaboration between health system epidemiologists (Basilicata) and clinicians to compare models of 'local' epidemiology in the management of diseases. The referral of patients to a nephrologist represents a working hypothesis of research- intervention. METHODS: Analysis of renal registry (RR) and administrative databases (hospital discharge abstracts/HDA, ambulatory);ad hoc surveys. RESULTS: Patients on dialysis between 1994 and 1998 are 594, cumulative deaths are 190 (32%). Males and the elderly (age = 65 years) are associated with more than 50% and threefold increase in relative risk of death, and with a diabetic nephropathy of 60% vs other renal diseases. Of 570 patients alive in 1996, 442 are linked with 2,628 HAD. Comorbid conditions are underreported in the RR (the Charlson index has been computed using HDA). Of 66 new dialysis cases, 31 are referred to a nephrologist only 6 months before the start of dialysis (47%) (22% diabetics). Patients discharged with chronic nephropathies (CN) and diabetes are 21% of CN patients (5% of diabetics). Of 100 patients with pre-end stage renal disease and diabetes, only 11-14 are discharged from the nephrology ward. At the local level, 3 out of 4 patients with serum creatinine higher than 1.5 mg/dl are not referred to a nephrologist. The prevalence of CN may vary from 0.4% to more than 1%. CONCLUSIONS: While an improvement in health databases in the regions is underway, collaboration studies are essential for planning specific interventions for prevention and management of diabetic nephropathy to improve the use of resources in nephrology.