Is laparoscopic fiberoptic choledochoscopy for common bile duct stones a fine option or a mandatory step?

BACKGROUND: Because choledochoscopy often is a challenging maneuver, it would be advantageous to define the real utility of its use. This study aimed to compare blind exploration of the common bile duct (CBD) with choledochoscopy-assisted CBD stone removal in terms of patient outcome and complication rate. METHODS: Two groups of patients were prospectively evaluated in a 4-year period. The study participants were 36 men and 27 women randomized to group A (n = 32) for a blind basket procedure or group B (n = 31) for a choledochoscopy-assisted procedure as the first step of laparoscopic CBD stone removal. Patients with preoperatively suspected CBD stones (n = 51) and those with unsuspected stones (n = 12) were included. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of anagraphics, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, or previous surgery. All the procedures were performed by surgeons skilled in this surgical field. Choledochoscopy, when used, was always performed with the instrument connected to a camera monitor that had a wide vision, whether in a single-monitor, in a picture-in-picture manner, or with the use of an additional monitor. RESULTS: From March 2004 to April 2008, 63 patients undergoing CBD exploration for stone removal were enrolled in the study. Five of these patients had undergone previous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). The mean operative time was 107 min for group A and 122 min for group B. The mean hospital stay was 3 days for group A and 3.6 days for group B. Clearance of CBD stones was achieved laparoscopically in 62 cases. One patient required open combined transduodenal papilloplasty and transcholedochotomy. In seven cases, blind basket exploration was unable to remove the stones according to the cholangiogram, so choledochoscopy was required. Six patients underwent a transversal coledocothomy for stone removal. A Kehr T-tube was placed in four of these patients. In four group A cases, the papilla was inadvertently passed during the procedure. In six group A cases, including the four aforementioned cases, a high level of amylases was found on postoperative day 1. At this writing, no late complications or stone recurrences have been observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic basket blind technique and choledochoscopy are safe and effective for CBD stone removal. However, the latter seems to be better in terms of a higher stone removal rate and fewer minor complications despite its longer operation time. In the authors' opinion, it may be preferable to reserve ERCP for very high-risk patients, taking into account that in addition to the related complications, it results in an approximate 10% rate of recurrent or persistent stones.

Hepatic resections by means of electrothermal bipolar vessel device (EBVS) LigaSure V: early experience.

BACKGROUND: Many techniques and devices are available for performing liver resection, such as clamp crushing, Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA), Hydrojet and dissecting sealer, ultrasonic shears, and, more recently, electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (EBVS). In this prospective trial we sought to evaluate the impact of EBVS on hepatic resections. METHODS: From March 2004 to December 2005, 24 patients from our consecutive liver resection series were enrolled in the present study. There were 17 males and 7 females with a mean age of 59.6 years (range = 41-80) who had colonic cancer metastases (18), hepatocarcinoma (3), angioma (2), and intrahepatic lithisasis (1). Patients were prospectively randomized to undergo liver resection via EBVS LigaSure V (12 patients, group A) or ultrasonic shears harmonic scalpel (HS) (12 patients, group B). Hepatic procedures did not differ significantly between the two groups and were as follows: right hepatectomy (2), left hepatectomy (1), bisegmentectomy (14), and segmentectomy (7). RESULTS: There was no mortality in either group. The mean operative time was 136.7 min (range = 90-210) in group A and 187.9 min (range = 130-360) in group B. The Pringle maneuver was done in five patients in group A [mean time = 11.4 min (range = 6-12)] and in four patients in group B [mean time = 16 min (range = 9-26)]. The mean blood loss, total bile salts, and hemoglobin concentration from drained fluid on the second postoperative day were 205.8 vs. 506.7 ml, 0.6 vs. 1.1 mmol/L, and 1.0 vs. 2.1 g/L (p < 0.05) for groups A and B, respectively. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.1 vs. 7.8 days. In group B a patient who underwent right hepatectomy for colon cancer metastases had transient hepatic failure. No patients received blood transfusions in group A, while two or more blood units were administered in two cases in group B. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study EBVS proved to be safe and effective for liver resection. By means of this device, statistically significant benefits concerning blood loss, total bile salts, and hemoglobin postoperative leakage were found.