Thyroid cancer and insulin resistance.

Thyroid cancer has shown a parallel increase with diabetes in the last few years. This narrative review aims to explain the association between these two entities, focusing on insulin resistance as the mediator and exploring the effects of antidiabetic agents on thyroid cancer incidence and progression.We searched Pubmed for English-written articles on insulin resistance, diabetes, antidiabetic treatments, and thyroid cancer reported from January 2019 to April 2023. Exclusion criteria were preclinical and clinical studies involving a population with thyroid dysfunction, benign nodular goiter, or those that only analyzed thyroid cancer's association with obesity.The results of the narrative literature review revealed 96 articles. Additionally, four studies from a manual search were retrieved. After the exclusion criteria were applied, we included 20 studies. Out of 8 studies on insulin-resistant or Metabolic Syndrome patients, all suggest a positive association with thyroid cancer. At the same time, for diabetes, four out of five publications support a link with thyroid cancer. The seven remaining studies on antidiabetics suggest that metformin might benefit thyroid cancer. In contrast, the evidence for an association between Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and increased thyroid cancer findings is limited.In conclusion, the association between thyroid cancer and diabetes may be explained by insulin resistance, as shown in observational studies. However, the causal role is yet to be defined. Although the wide use of different antidiabetic agents has been related to thyroid cancer prevalence and progression, future research with drugs such as metformin or GLP-1 RA is still needed.

Comparison of different systems of ultrasound (US) risk stratification for malignancy in elderly patients with thyroid nodules. Real world experience.

PURPOSE: To comparatively assess the performance of three sonographic classification systems, American Thyroid Association (ATA), the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS), and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE)/American College of Endocrinology (ACE)/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi (AME) in identifying malignant nodules in an elderly population. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of patients referred for fine needle aspiration biopsy in an academic center for the elderly. One nodule/patient was considered. Nodules classified Bethesda V/VI were considered malignant. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were established and compared to evaluate diagnostic performance. Malignancy among biopsies below the size cutoff for each ultrasound classification was also compared. RESULTS: One thousand, eight hundred sixty-seven patients (92% females); median (Q1-Q3), age 71 (67-76) years, were studied showing 82.8% benign (Bethesda II) and 2.6% malignant cytology. The three classifications correctly identified malignancy (P < 0.01). Nonetheless, in the ATA and AACE/ACE/AME 16 and 2 malignant nodules, respectively, were unclassifiable. Including unclassified malignant nodules (n = 1234, malignant = 50), comparison of the ROC curves showed lower performance of ATA [area under the curve (AUC) = ATA (0.49) vs. ACR TI-RADS (0.62), p = 0.008 and ATA vs. AACE/ACE/AME (0.59), p = 0.022]. Proportion of below size cutoff biopsies for ATA, ACR TI-RADS, and AACE/ACE/AME was different [16, 42, and 29% (all p < 0.001)], but no differences in malignancy rate were observed in these nodules. CONCLUSION: The present study is the first to validate in elderly patients these classifications showing that AACE/ACE/AME and ACR TI-RADS can predict thyroid malignancy more accurately than the ATA when unclassifiable malignant nodules are considered. Moreover, in this aged segment of the population, the use of ACR TI-RADS avoided more invasive procedures.