Characterization of water sorption, solubility, and roughness of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite resins.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness (SR), water sorption (WS), and solubility (SO) of four composite resins after finishing/polishing and after one year of water storage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two low-shrinkage composites (Filtek Silorane [3M ESPE] and Aelite LS [Bisco Inc]) and two composites of conventional formulations (Heliomolar and Tetric N-Ceram [Ivoclar Vivadent]) were tested. Their respective finishing and polishing systems (Sof-Lex Discs, 3M ESPE; Finishing Discs Kit, Bisco Inc; and Astropol F, P, HP, Ivoclar Vivadent) were used according to the manufacturers' instructions. Ten disc-shaped specimens of each composite resin were made for each evaluation. Polished surfaces were analyzed using a profilometer after 24 hours and one year. For the WS and SO, the discs were stored in desiccators until constant mass was achieved. Specimens were then stored in water for seven days or one year, at which time the mass of each specimen was measured. The specimens were dried again and dried specimen mass determined. The WS and SO were calculated from these measurements. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test (α=0.05). RESULTS: Filtek Silorane showed the lowest SR, WS, and SO means. Water storage for one year increased the WS means for all composite resins tested. CONCLUSIONS: The silorane-based composite resin results were better than those obtained for methacrylate-based resins. One-year water storage did not change the SR and SO properties in any of the composite resins.

Effect of curing mode on bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cements to dentin.

In this study, the in vitro bond strength of dual-curing resin cements to indirect composite restorations when the cement was either light polymerized or allowed to only autopolymerize was evaluated. Occlusal dentin surfaces of 56 extracted human third molars were flattened to expose coronal dentin. Teeth were assigned to eight groups (n = 7) according to resin cement products and polymerization modes: conventional cement (Panavia F 2.0; Kuraray Medical) and self-adhesive cements [RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE), BisCem (Bisco), and G-Cem (GC Corp.)]. Cements were applied to prepolymerized resin discs (2-mm-thick Sinfony; 3M ESPE), which were subsequently bonded to the prepared dentin surfaces. The restored teeth were either light-polymerized through the overlying composite according to manufacturers' instructions or were allowed to only self-cure. After 24 h, the teeth and restorations were sectioned to obtain multiple bonded beams (1.0 mm(2)) and tested in tension at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until failure. Data (MPa) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (alpha = 0.05). Light activation of some cement systems (G-Cem and Panavia F 2.0) increased the bond strength, while the curing mode did not affect the bond strength for some (RelyX Unicem and BisCem). The bond strength in the autopolymerized mode varied among products. In general, the use of self-adhesive resin cements did not provide significantly higher bond strengths than that of a conventional material, and two self-adhesive cements yielded significantly lower bond values (regardless of cure mode) than the other products.