A pharmacoeconomic analysis of phosphate binders cost-effectiveness in the RISCAVID study.

BACKGROUND: A pharmacoeconomic analysis of the RISCAVID database aimed at assessing the cost effectiveness of phosphate binders in preventing CV mortality and morbidity over 7 years was performed. METHODS: Morbid or fatal events occurring in 750 chronic HD patients were recorded. Statistical analysis evaluated the distribution of variables and the effect of sevelamer on survival. A cost-effectiveness evaluation was performed using a probabilistic model based on a Markov chain. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that treatment with sevelamer was associated with a reduced stroke incidence by 52% (p = 0.04) and reduced levels of C-reactive protein (p < 0.01). Cost-effectiveness evaluation evidenced a 33% decrease in hospital-days for patients treated with sevelamer, with and without comorbidities compared to patients undergoing calcium binders treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with sevelamer was associated with a reduced risk of stroke in HD patients, with a clear saving on disease-related costs for the Italian National Healthcare System.

Geriatric nutritional risk index is a strong predictor of mortality in hemodialysis patients: data from the Riscavid cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition is a common complication in hemodialysis (HD) patients and it is related to morbidity and mortality. Although a gold standard method for diagnosis of malnutrition is not available, serum albumin, body weight and height are commonly used and are included in the calculation of the Geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI). Recently the association between GNRI and mortality in chronic HD patients has been documented in Asian populations. Our aim was to examine the relative reliability of the GNRI as a mortality and morbidity predictor in an Italian HD cohort. METHODS: We prospectively examined the GNRI of 753 maintenance HD patients aged 65.7 ± 14.1 years, 457 males, included in the Riscavid cohort, and followed them up for 84 months. Predictors for all-cause death were examined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazards analyses. RESULTS: Low GNRI was significantly associated with signs of wasting, i.e. low Body mass index, hypoalbuminemia, low normalized protein catabolic rate. Patients within the lowest GNRI quartile had a significantly lower survival rate than those in the 2nd to 4th quartile (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis demonstrated that the lowest quartile of GNRI was a significant predictor of case mix adjusted all-cause mortality (HR 1.72; CI 1.35-2.18, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that low GNRI (<92) is associated with malnutrition and is a strong predictor of overall mortality in HD patients. However, cardiovascular events did not differ among the GNRI quartiles. A low GNRI score can be considered a simple and reliable marker of malnutrition and predictor for mortality risk in Caucasian HD patients.

Nutritional knowledge in hemodialysis patients and nurses: focus on phosphorus.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge of adult hemodialysis patients and nurses working in dialysis units, specifically with regard to knowledge of phosphorus and other nutrients related to dietary management of end-stage renal disease. DESIGN: Cross-sectional cohort study. SETTING: Hemodialysis unit. SUBJECTS: One hundred ninety-one hemodialysis patients and 105 dialysis nurses, as well as 86 control hospital employees who are not health professionals. INTERVENTION: Nutritional knowledge was assessed by a 25-item chronic kidney disease knowledge assessment tool for nutrition, which includes 15 questions on phosphorus and 10 questions on protein, sodium, and potassium knowledge. RESULTS: The scores obtained by patients were much lower than those of nurses (11.6 ± 3.9 vs. 16.0 ± 2.2, P < .001) but slightly higher than those of controls (10.6 ± 3.2, P < .05). Patients with phosphorus serum level >5.5 mg/dL showed chronic kidney disease knowledge assessment tool for nutrition scores similar to those of patients with a serum phosphorus level <5.5 mg/dL. The prevalence of right answers to questions regarding knowledge of phosphorus was lower than that regarding knowledge of the other nutrients, both for patients (38.4% ± 17.8% vs. 57.3% ± 19.9%, P < .001) and nurses (55.6% ± 11.1% vs. 74.8% ± 11.7%, P < .001) as well as for controls (30.7% ± 14.5% vs. 60.1% ± 17.4%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that nutritional knowledge of hemodialysis patients, although higher than the general population, is lower for phosphorus with respect to the other nutrients, such as protein, sodium, and potassium. This occurs even in patients with hyperphosphatemia or those taking phosphate binder medications. Nurses showed the best scores; however, improvement is necessary, especially with regard to knowledge of phosphorus. Training programs on nutrition for nurses and on information for patients should be implemented. They can contribute to achievement of a more effective control of phosphate balance, reduction of costs, and improvement of the quality of care for hemodialysis patients.