The national COVID-19 vaccination campaign targeting the extremely vulnerable: the Florence Medical Oncology Unit experience in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: International and national oncology societies had released recommendations in favor of COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients. In the context of the national vaccination campaign targeting the so called extremely vulnerable, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the mRNA vaccines in a cohort of 623 patients. METHODS: Between March 26 and April 04, 2021, the Pfizer and BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA and the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines were given as a two-dose prime-boost regimen. Starting on September 25th 2021 a third dose was offered to patients in whom a suboptimal immunogenicity with COVID-19 vaccination could be expected. Safety assessments were performed by phone call 7 days after each dose. Electronic health records were accessed to review demographic information, disease history, treatment detail, and outcome events of participants patients'. FINDINGS: No toxicities were reported in 63.7%, 54%, and in 48.7% patients with cancer after each dose. Mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site was the most commonly adverse event. After the second dose, 46% of the 610 patients reported toxicity, with more systemic side-effects observed. Fever was reported in 45% of patients, with a temperature ≥ 38 °C in 21.4% of them. Of the 335 patients receiving a third vaccine dose, 51% reported toxicity, with 13% of patients reporting more than one effect. Logistic regression analysis reported mixed results, with limited variables or categories reporting a significant odd ratio. The type of vaccine reported a significant value at first dose (OR = 0.12; CI 0.52, 0.26; p = 0.00). Thirty-four cases of COVID-19 infection were reported with only one patient requiring a short-term hospitalization for monitoring. INTERPRETATION: The safety profile of the mRNA vaccines does not raise any specific concerns and support prioritization of vaccination for cancer patients.

Protracted Inhibition of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Signaling Improves Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Clinical data suggest that beyond-progression, the blockade of angiogenesis is associated with improved survivals in colorectal cancer. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the therapeutic effects of antiangiogenic drugs administered as later lines of treatment in patients already progressed to a previous anti-VEGF based treatment. An extensive literature search was conducted. Hazard ratios (HR) for progression (PFS) and death (OS) were extracted. An inverse-variance meta-analysis model was implemented. 6 randomized controlled trials were retrieved, including 3407 patients, treated with different antiangiogenic drugs. All of them had progressed during or after a previous line of treatment with bevacizumab. Overall, both PFS (HR=0.63, P <0.001) and OS (HR=0.81, P < 0.001) were significantly increased with the use of antiangiogenic drug. No heterogeneity was observed despite different drugs. Protracted inhibition of the VEGF pathway is associated with a significant improvement of both PFS and OS, independently from the antiangiogenic agent used.

Progression-free Survival as a Surrogate End-point in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Treated with Antiangiogenic Therapies.

BACKGROUND: It is not clear if progression-free survival (PFS) is a good surrogate end-point for overall survival (OS) for metastatic colorectal cancer if antiangiogenic therapies are used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated randomized controlled trials testing antiangiogenic agents against chemotherapy. Log hazard ratios (HR) for PFS and OS were used to construct linear regression models. The surrogate threshold effect (STE) was calculated. RESULTS: Thirteen studies and 24 comparison arms were available, including 7,179 patients. This model returned a significant correlation between PFS and OS (R(2)=0.68, p<0.001) with an STE of 0.83. Analysis restricted to first-line gave similar results (R(2)=0.68, p<0.001, STE=0.75). CONCLUSION: There is a significant correlation between the effect of treatment on PFS and OS. PFS remains a good surrogate end-point for OS even if anti-angiogenic agents are used.