Enhancing diabetes therapy adherence: a comprehensive study on glucometer usability for type 2 diabetes patients.

Background: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is a vital practice for type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and glucometers have the potential to improve therapy adherence. However, characteristics of glucometers improving their usability are underexplored. A knowledge gap exists regarding patients under 65, warranting further research for diabetes care improvement. Thus, this study aims to gather insights on glucometer accessibility, by analyzing the case of the Accu-Chek® Instant glucometer by Roche Diabetes Care GmbH. Methods: Starting from a previous study having the objective of investigating devices' features able to improve SMBG in over 65 T2DM patients, using the same device, we enlarged the scale, designing a survey that collected answers from 1145 patients of the Center and South of Italy, both under and over 65. 957 answers were analyzed, according to a threshold of 50% completion of the answers. Results: Our results show the major characteristics presented in Accu-Chek® Instant are appreciated differently between patients under 65 and over 65, and between patients with or without previous experience with a glucometer. Discussions and conclusions: It emerged how Accu-Chek® was perceived as more user-friendly among individuals under 65 compared to those aged 65 and over, where more people had prior experience, indicating how such a glucometer can be particularly helpful for naive patients. The study provides valuable insights to the academic discourse on glucometer features and their influence on therapy adherence.

Effectiveness, Simplification and Persistence of IDegLira in Poorly Controlled People with Type 2 Diabetes: A 4-Year Follow-Up Real-World Study.

INTRODUCTION: Efficacy and safety of the fixed ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) has been largely documented. However, long-term data are limited. This study aimed at describing persistence in therapy and the effectiveness at 48 months of IDegLira. METHODS: We conducted an observational study based on retrospective chart review. All patients treated with IDegLira during 2018-2022 were included. Data on treatment approaches and clinical outcomes were collected at the first prescription of IDegLira (T0) and after 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months. RESULTS: Overall, 156 patients (mean age 68 years, 64.1% men) started IDegLira, of whom 88 (56.4%) were previously treated with basal-oral therapy (BOT) and 68 (43.6%) with basal-bolus schemes (BB). Before starting IDegLira, 23.8% were treated with ≥ 2 oral antihyperglycemic agents in association with insulin; at T0, the proportion decreased to 3.2%. Short-acting insulin was discontinued after the first week. After 48 months, levels of HbA1c were significantly reduced by 1.34% in the BOT group and 1.07% in the BB group (p < 0.0001 in both groups). In the BOT group, FBG levels decreased by about 50 mg/dl and body weight was unchanged. In the BB group, FBG levels decreased by about 40 mg/dl and body weight was significantly reduced by an average of 7.7 kg. Five patients (3.2%) interrupted therapy with IDegLira during 48 months, and no severe hypoglycemia occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our study emphasizes the important role of IDegLira in maintaining a good metabolic control while minimizing the risk of major hypoglycemia and weight gain in the long term. The substantial simplification of treatment schemes can increase adherence.

Once-weekly semaglutide use in patients with type 2 diabetes: Real-world data from the SURE Italy observational study.

AIMS: SURE Italy, a multicentre, prospective, open-label, observational, real-world study, investigated once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with T2D and ≥1 documented glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level within 12 weeks of semaglutide initiation were enrolled. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to end of study (EOS; ~30 weeks). Other endpoints included changes in body weight, waist circumference and patient-reported outcomes, and the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% or <6.5%, weight loss ≥5% and a post-hoc composite endpoint (HbA1c reduction of ≥1%-point and weight loss ≥5%). These endpoints were reported for patients on semaglutide at EOS [effectiveness analysis set (EAS)]. Safety data were reported in the full analysis set. RESULTS: Of 579 patients who initiated semaglutide (full analysis set), 491 completed the study on treatment (EAS). Mean baseline HbA1c was 8.0%, and 20.7% (120 of 579) of patients had HbA1c <7.0%. Mean semaglutide dose at EOS was 0.66 ± 0.28 mg. In the EAS, mean HbA1c and body weight decreased by 1.1%-point (95% confidence interval 1.20, 1.05; P < .0001) and 4.2 kg (95% confidence interval 4.63, 3.67; P < .0001), respectively. At EOS, 61.7% and 40.8% of patients achieved HbA1c <7.0% and <6.5%, respectively, 40.5% achieved weight loss ≥5% and 25.3% achieved the post-hoc composite endpoint. Patient-reported outcomes improved from baseline to EOS. No new safety concerns were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice in Italy, patients with T2D treated with once-weekly semaglutide for 30 weeks achieved clinically significant improvements in HbA1c, body weight and other outcomes.

Effectiveness in Real World of Once Weekly Semaglutide in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonist Naïve or Switchers from Other Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists: Results from a Retrospective Observational Study in Umbria.

INTRODUCTION: To complement results of the SUSTAIN program, this study assessed effectiveness and safety of once weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) managed under routine care. METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational, retrospective study including all patients treated with semaglutide. Changes in clinical outcomes from baseline to 6 and 12 months were assessed in patients who were glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) naïve or switching from another GLP-1RA. Discontinuation rate was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 216 patients (mean age 64 years, 65.7% men) were evaluated: 135 (61.5%) naïve and 81 (38.5%) switchers from another GLP-1RA. In the naïve cohort, after 6 months from semaglutide initiation, levels of HbA1c significantly decreased by - 1.31% (p < 0.0001). All obesity indices improved, with mean reductions in body weight of - 3.92 kg, in BMI of - 1.43 kg/m2, and in waist circumference of - 5.03 cm. In the switcher cohort, statistically significant improvements in HbA1c (- 0.78%), body weight (- 2.64 kg), and waist circumference (- 3.03 cm) were obtained after 6 months. Reductions were sustained after 12 months in both cohorts (mean semaglutide dose: 0.86 mg in naïve and 0.96 mg in switcher cohort). Blood pressure and lipid profile mean levels decreased after 12 months from semaglutide initiation in both cohorts. No severe hypoglycemia occurred; 6.5% of patients discontinued semaglutide (2.8% due to gastrointestinal side effects). CONCLUSION: Effectiveness and tolerability of semaglutide have been confirmed in the real world irrespective of diabetes duration and severity. As expected, more marked reductions in HbA1c and obesity indices were obtained in naïve patients, but it is noteworthy that relevant improvements were also obtained in patients already treated with GLP-1RAs.

Switching Patients with Type 1 Diabetes to Insulin Degludec from Other Basal Insulins: Real-World Data of Effectiveness and Safety.

INTRODUCTION: Real-world evidence on the effectiveness and safety of insulin degludec (IDeg) in patients with diabetes is a priority. We have therefore evaluated the effectiveness and safety of IDeg, including impact on metabolic control, glycemic variability, weight gain and hypoglycemia, in patients with type 1 diabetes under routine clinical practice conditions. METHODS: This was an observational longitudinal multicenter study. A retrospective chart review of all patients with type 1 diabetes who were switched from basal insulin to IDeg was performed, and temporal trends in clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Data obtained from 195 patients, with a median age of 42.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 24.6-56.4] years and a median diabetes duration of 16 (IQR 10.0-28) years, were analyzed. Median follow-up was 9.5 (IQR 7.7-11.3) months. Improvements were found in glycated hemoglobin (- 0.34%; p < 0.0001), fasting blood glucose (- 24.82 mg/dL; p < 0.0001), post-prandial glucose (- 17.23 mg/dL; p = 0.0009), glycemic variability as indicated by standard deviation of blood glucose (- 5.67 mg/dL; p < 0.0001) and high blood glucose index (- 3.77; p < 0.0001). Body weight and body mass index remained substantially stable during the follow-up (- 0.18 kg; p = 0.56 and - 0.12; p = 0.42, respectively). Risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia decreased by 52% [incidence rate ratio 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.77] and risk of total hypoglycemic episodes by 41% (incidence ratio 0.59; 95% CI 0.45-0.83). Basal and short-acting insulin doses decreased by - 1.4 and - 3.1 IU, respectively. CONCLUSION: Switching patients with type 1 diabetes to IDeg from other basal insulins was associated with relevant improvements in metabolic control and glycemic variability without weight gain; the risk of hypoglycemic episodes also significantly declined. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk S.p.A. unconditional grant.

Impact of Insulin Degludec in Type 2 Diabetes: Real-World Data on Effectiveness and Safety.

INTRODUCTION: Real-world evidence on effectiveness and safety of insulin degludec (IDeg) in patients with diabetes is a priority. The aim of the study was to evaluate patterns of use and the long-term effectiveness and safety of IDeg in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This was an observational longitudinal study. A retrospective chart review of all patients with type 2 diabetes treated with IDeg was performed and temporal trends in clinical outcomes were assessed. All data was stratified by treatment modality: the switch group consisted of patients already treated with another basal insulin before initiating IDeg; the add-on group consisted of basal insulin-naïve patients. RESULTS: Overall, 247 patients were analyzed (55 in the add-on group and 192 in the switch group), mean age 67.0 ± 10.9 years ,and diabetes duration 16.3 ± 8.9 years. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 9.7 (8.0-11.9) months. In the add-on group, improvements were found in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (- 1.68%; p < 0.0001), fasting blood glucose (FBG) (- 64.7 mg/dL; p < 0.0001), post-prandial glucose (PPG) (- 81.1 mg/dl; p < 0.0001), and glycemic variability (i.e., standard deviation of blood glucose) (- 11.6 mg/dl; p = 0.04). Even in the switch group, improvements were found in HbA1c (- 0.57%; p < 0.0001), FBG (- 28.1 mg/dL; p < 0.0001), and PPG (- 22.6 mg/dl; p = 0.001). Body weight increase during the follow-up was not statistically significant vs. baseline in both groups. Benefits on overall, nocturnal, and severe hypoglycemia were found in the switch group. CONCLUSION: These real-world data documented that initiating IDeg or switching to IDeg from other basal insulins in type 2 diabetes was associated with significant improvement in metabolic control without significant weight gain; a decrease in the risk of hypoglycemia was observed when switching to IDeg from another basal insulin.

Fine needle aspiration coupled with real-time PCR: a painless methodology to study adaptive functional changes in skeletal muscle.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In this study we developed a new methodology for obtaining human skeletal muscle samples to evaluate gene expression. This approach is based on a fine needle aspiration technique, which allows us to extract a small tissue sample in a significantly less invasive manner than with classic biopsy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Multiplex tandem RT-PCR was used to determine the mRNA levels of genes involved in ATP production and mitochondrial biogenesis in muscle tissue. Samples of vastus lateralis muscle were obtained from 21 healthy subjects with different fitness levels. The principal findings in our study show a strong correlation between PGC-1alpha and COX5B (p<0.001) and between PGC-1alpha and MT-CO2 (p=0.017) expression. Furthermore, a significant positive correlation between mtDNA content and the percentage of MHCI present in the aspired samples were found (p=0.028). These data are in agreement with current knowledge on skeletal muscle physiology and show the reliability of the proposed method. CONCLUSION: This painless methodology can be used to investigate, in vivo, human muscle RNA and DNA adaptations in response to either physiological and/or pharmacological stimuli. This method has major clinical relevance, such as its application in clarifying the mechanisms underling metabolic and systemic disorders.

Exercise and diabetes.

Physical activity activates has acute and chronic effects on glucose, lipid and protein metabolism. In type 1 diabetic subjects, the lack of the physiological inhibition of insulin secretion during exercise results in a potential risk of hypoglycemia. On the other hand, exercise-induced activation of counterregulatory hormones might trigger an acute metabolic derangement in severe insulin-deficient subjects. Thus, diabetic patients, before starting exercise sessions, must be carefully educated about the consequences of physical activity on their blood glucose and the appropriate modifications of diet and insulin therapy. Long-term effects of regular exercise are particularly advantageous for type 2 diabetic patients. Regular aerobic exercise reduces of visceral fat mass and body weight without decreasing lean body mass, ameliorates insulin sensitivity, glucose and blood pressure control, lipid profile and reduces the cardiovascular risk. For these reasons, regular aerobic physical activity must be considered an essential component of the cure of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this regard, individual behavioral strategies have been documented to be effective in motivating sedentary type 2 diabetic subjects to the adoption and the maintenance of regular physical activity.

Metabolic and endocrine effects of physiological increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence indicates that the administration of large amounts of ghrelin to humans increases circulating concentrations of several pituitary and adrenal hormones, induces hyperglycemia and reduces serum insulin concentrations. At present, it is not known whether physiological increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations affect glucose kinetics or hormone concentrations in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the effects of two- and three-fold increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations in eight healthy subjects during a 2 h intravenous infusion of 7.5 (GHRE7.5), 15 (GHRE15) pmol kg(-1) min(-1) acylated human ghrelin or placebo (PL), in a randomized double-blind study. Compared with PL (146 +/- 24 pM) plasma ghrelin concentrations increased at 120 min (p<0.001) about two-fold after GHRE7.5 (300 +/- 35 pM) and three-fold after GHRE15 (494 +/- 30 pM). GHRE15 significantly increased circulating concentrations of NEFA, GH, ACTH, epinephrine, and prolactin (p<0.01). GHRELIN7.5 significantly (p<0.01) increased only serum GH concentrations. Neither ghrelin infusions changed glucose flux or circulating concentrations of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, IGF-1, cortisol and norepinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: GH secretion is the only response that is stimulated by physiological increments in plasma ghrelin concentrations; about three-fold increases in plasma ghrelin concentrations are required to elicit the responses of epinephrine, prolactin, ACTH and NEFA.

Make your diabetic patients walk: long-term impact of different amounts of physical activity on type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the impact of different amounts of increased energy expenditure on type 2 diabetes care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Post hoc analysis of long-term effects of different amounts of increased energy expenditure (metabolic equivalents [METS] per hour per week) through voluntary aerobic physical activity was performed in 179 type 2 diabetic subjects (age 62 +/- 1 years [mean +/- SE]) randomized to a physical activity counseling intervention. Subjects were followed for 2 years and divided into six groups based on their increments in METs per hour per week: group 0 (no activity, n = 28), group 1-10 (6.8 +/- 0.3, n = 27), group 11-20 (17.1 +/- 0.4, n = 31), group 21-30 (27.0 +/- 0.5, n = 27), group 31-40 (37.5 +/- 0.5, n = 32), and group >40 (58.3 +/- 1.8, n = 34). RESULTS: At baseline, the six groups did not differ for energy expenditure, age, sex, diabetes duration, and all parameters measured. After 2 years, in group 0 and in group 1-10, no parameter changed; in groups 11-20, 21-30, 31-40, and >40, HbA(1c), blood pressure, total serum cholesterol, triglycerides, and estimated percent of 10-year coronary heart disease risk improved (P < 0.05). In group 21-30, 31-40, and >40, body weight, waist circumference, heart rate, fasting plasma glucose, serum LDL and HDL cholesterol also improved (P < 0.05). METs per hour per week correlated positively with changes of HDL cholesterol and negatively with those of other parameters (P < 0.001). After 2 years, per capita yearly costs of medications increased (P = 0.008) by USD393 in group 0, did not significantly change in group 1-10 (USD 206, P = 0.09), and decreased in group 11-20 (USD -196, P = 0.01), group 21-30 (USD -593, P = 0.009), group 31-40 (USD -660, P = 0.003), and group >40 (USD -579, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Energy expenditure >10 METs . h(-1) . week(-1) obtained through aerobic leisure time physical activity is sufficient to achieve health and financial advantages, but full benefits are achieved with energy expenditure >20 METs . h(-1) . week(-1).

Insulin is required for prandial ghrelin suppression in humans.

Accumulating evidence indicates that ghrelin plays a role in regulating food intake and energy homeostasis. In normal subjects, circulating ghrelin concentrations decrease after meal ingestion and increase progressively before meals. At present, it is not clear whether nutrients suppress the plasma ghrelin concentration directly or indirectly by stimulating insulin secretion. To test the hypothesis that insulin regulates postprandial plasma ghrelin concentrations in humans, we compared the effects of meal ingestion on plasma ghrelin levels in six C-peptide-negative subjects with type 1 diabetes and in six healthy subjects matched for age, sex, and BMI. Diabetic subjects were studied during absence of insulin (insulin withdrawal study), with intravenous infusion of basal insulin (basal insulin study) and subcutaneous administration of a prandial insulin dose (prandial insulin study). Meal intake suppressed plasma ghrelin concentrations (nadir at 105 min) by 32 +/- 4% in normal control subjects, 57 +/- 3% in diabetic patients during the prandial insulin study (P < 0.002 vs. control subjects), and 38 +/- 8% during basal insulin study (P = 0.0016 vs. hyperinsulinemia; P = NS vs. control subjects) but did not have any effect in the insulin withdrawal study (P < 0.001 vs. other studies). In conclusion, 1). insulin is essential for meal-induced plasma ghrelin suppression, 2). basal insulin availability is sufficient for postprandial ghrelin suppression in type 1 diabetic subjects, and 3). lack of meal-induced ghrelin suppression caused by severe insulin deficiency may explain hyperphagia of uncontrolled type 1 diabetic subjects.

Validation of a counseling strategy to promote the adoption and the maintenance of physical activity by type 2 diabetic subjects.

OBJECTIVE: There is enough evidence that physical activity is an effective therapeutic tool in the management of type 2 diabetes. The present study was designed to validate a counseling strategy that could be used by physicians in their daily outpatient practice to promote the adoption and maintenance of physical activity by type 2 diabetic subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The long-term (2-year) efficacy of the behavioral approach (n = 182) was compared with usual care treatment (n = 158) in two matched, randomized groups of patients with type 2 diabetes who had been referred to our Outpatient Diabetes Center. The outcome of the intervention was consistent patient achievement of an energy expenditure of >10 metabolic equivalents (METs)-h/week through voluntary physical activity. RESULTS: After 2 years, 69% of the patients in the intervention group (27.1 +/- 2.0 METs x h/week) and 18% of the control group (4.1 +/- 0.8 METs x h/week) achieved the target (P < 0.001) with significant (P < 0.001) improvements in BMI (intervention group 28.9 +/- 0.2 versus control group 30.4 +/- 0.3 kg/m(2)) and HbA(1c) (intervention group 7.0 +/- 0.1 versus control group 7.6 +/- 0.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized, controlled study shows that physicians can motivate most patients with type 2 diabetes to exercise long-term and emphasizes the value of individual behavioral approaches in daily practice.

Ghrelin is not necessary for adequate hormonal counterregulation of insulin-induced hypoglycemia.

Ghrelin is a novel enteric hormone that stimulates growth hormone (GH), ACTH, and epinephrine; augments plasma glucose; and increases food intake by inducing the feeling of hunger. These characteristics make ghrelin a potential counterregulatory hormone. At present, it is not known whether ghrelin increases in response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia. To answer this question, we compared plasma ghrelin concentrations after a short-term insulin infusion that was allowed or not (euglycemic clamp) to cause hypoglycemia (2.7 +/- 0.2 mmol/l at 30 min) in five healthy volunteers. In both studies, plasma ghrelin concentrations decreased (P < 0.01) after insulin infusion (hypoglycemia by 14%, euglycemia by 22%), reached a nadir at 30 min, and returned to baseline at 60 min, without differences between the hypoglycemia and the euglycemia studies. Glucagon, cortisol, and GH increased in response to hypoglycemia despite the decreased ghrelin. There was a strong correlation (R(2) = 0.91, P < 0.002) between the insulin sensitivity of the subjects and the percentage suppression of ghrelin from baseline. These data demonstrate that ghrelin is not required for the hormonal defenses against insulin-induced hypoglycemia and that insulin can suppress ghrelin levels in healthy humans. These results raise the possibility that postprandial hyperinsulinemia is responsible for the reduction of plasma ghrelin that occurs during meal intake.