Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842039

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sedation, ranging from minimal, moderate and deep sedation to general anesthesia, improves patient comfort and procedure quality in gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE). There are currently no comprehensive recommendations on sedation practice in diagnostic and therapeutic GIE. We aimed to investigate real-life sedation practice in elective GIE. METHODS: We performed a multicentric observational study across 14 Endoscopy Units in Italy. We recorded consecutive data on all diagnostic procedures performed with Anesthesiologist-directed care (ADC) and all therapeutic procedures performed with ADC or non-Anesthesiologist sedation (NAS) over a three-month period. RESULTS: Dedicated ADC is available five days/week in 28.6% (4/14), four days/week in 21.5% (3/14), three days/week in 35.7% (5/14), two days/week in 7.1% (1/14) and one day/week in 7.1% (1/14) of participating Centers. ADC use for elective diagnostic GIE varied from 18.2% to 75.1% of the total number of procedures performed with ADC among different Centers. ADC use for elective therapeutic GIE varied from 10.8% to 98.9% of the total number of elective therapeutic procedures performed among different Centers. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the lack of standardization and consequent great variability in sedation practice for elective GIE, with ADC being potentially overused for diagnostic procedures and underused for complex therapeutic procedures. A collaborative effort involving Endoscopists, Anesthesiologist and Institutions is needed to optimize sedation practice in GIE.

3.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 73(9): 1275-1281, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32475031

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe early prosthesis implantations in a cohort of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) followed in a tertiary referral hospital and to analyze possible factors influencing implant survival. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Charts of all patients with JIA who underwent total joint replacement at Gaetano Pini Hospital, Milan, Italy from January 1992 to June 2019 were retrieved, and relevant data were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients met the inclusion criteria for this study, with a median follow-up period of 17.2 years. The median age at first prosthesis was 22.7 years. The total number of replaced joints was 198 over a period of 27 years. The hip was the most frequently replaced joint, accounting for almost two-thirds of the total number of implants; the other one-third refers mostly to knee implants. Polyarticular JIA and systemic JIA were the most represented JIA categories in the study cohort. A significant upward trend of the age at arthroplasty and of disease duration before arthroplasty over decades was found. The rates of implant survival at 5, 10, and 15 years were comparable (from 84% to 89%); 50% of implants lasted ≥20 years. CONCLUSION: We reported retrospective data on early joint replacement in a cohort of patients with JIA. We observed a progressive and significant upward trend of both age at arthroplasty and disease duration before the first arthroplasty over time. The JIA category, year of implant, and presence of complications significantly affected implant survivorship.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile/surgery , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle/instrumentation , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation , Hip Prosthesis , Joints/surgery , Knee Prosthesis , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Arthritis, Juvenile/diagnosis , Arthritis, Juvenile/physiopathology , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Italy , Joints/diagnostic imaging , Joints/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Failure , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Tertiary Care Centers , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
4.
PLoS One ; 15(7): e0235038, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32609729

ABSTRACT

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by pathogenic variants in mismatch repair (MMR) genes that predispose individuals to different malignancies, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer. Current guidelines recommended testing for LS in individuals with newly diagnosed CRC to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality in relatives. Economic evaluations in support of such approach, however, are not available in Italy. We developed a decision-analytic model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of LS screening from the perspective of the Italian National Health System. Three testing strategies: the sequencing of all MMR genes without prior tumor analysis (Strategy 1), a sequential IHC and MS-MLPA analysis (Strategy 2), and an age-targeted strategy with a revised Bethesda criteria assessment before IHC and methylation-specific MLPA for patients ≥ than 70 years old (Strategy 3) were analyzed and compared to the "no testing" strategy. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) in relatives after colonoscopy, aspirin prophylaxis and an intensive gynecological surveillance were estimated through a Markov model. Assuming a CRC incidence rate of 0.09% and a share of patients affected by LS equal to 2.81%, the number of detected pathogenic variants among CRC cases ranges, in a given year, between 910 and 1167 depending on the testing strategy employed. The testing strategies investigated, provided one-time to the entire eligible population (CRC patients), were associated with an overall cost ranging between €1,753,059.93-€10,388,000.00. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of the Markov model ranged from €941.24 /QALY to €1,681.93 /QALY, thus supporting that "universal testing" versus "no testing" is cost-effective, but not necessarily in comparison with age-targeted strategies. This is the first economic evaluation on different testing strategies for LS in Italy. The results might support the introduction of cost-effective recommendations for LS screening in Italy.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Genetic Testing/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , DNA Mismatch Repair , Genetic Testing/methods , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , MutL Protein Homolog 1/genetics , Pedigree , Probability , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
5.
PLoS One ; 15(4): e0230749, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32240206

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The international public health (PH) community is debating the opportunity to incorporate genomic technologies into PH practice. A survey was conducted to assess attitudes of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA) members towards their role in the implementation of public health genomics (PHG), and their knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing and the delivery of genetic services. METHODS: EUPHA members were invited via monthly newsletter and e-mail to take part in an online survey from February 2017 to January 2018. A descriptive analysis of knowledge and attitudes was conducted, along with a univariate and multivariate analysis of their determinants. RESULTS: Five hundred and two people completed the questionnaire, 17.9% were involved in PHG activities. Only 28.9% correctly identified all medical conditions for which there is (or not) evidence for implementing genetic testing; over 60% thought that investing in genomics may divert economic resources from social and environmental determinants of health. The majority agreed that PH professionals may play different roles in incorporating genomics into their activities. Better knowledge was associated with positive attitudes towards the use of genetic testing and the delivery of genetic services in PH (OR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.01-2.18). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed quite positive attitudes, but also a need to increase awareness on genomics among European PH professionals. Those directly involved in PHG activities tend to have a more positive attitude and better knowledge; however, gaps are also evident in this group, suggesting the need to harmonize practice and encourage greater exchange of knowledge among professionals.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Genetic Testing/methods , Genomics/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/psychology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Public Health/standards , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Education, Public Health Professional/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Professional Competence , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
Genet Med ; 20(10): 1131-1144, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29300371

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Lynch syndrome (LS) screening can significantly reduce cancer morbidity and mortality in mutation carriers. Our aim was to identify cost-effective LS screening programs that can be implemented in the "real world." METHODS: We performed a systematic review of full economic evaluations of genetic screening for LS in different target populations; health outcomes were estimated in life-years gained or quality-adjusted life-years. RESULTS: Overall, 20 studies were included in the systematic review. Based on the study populations, we identified six categories of LS screening program: colorectal cancer (CRC)-based, endometrial cancer-based, general population-based, LS family registry-based, cascade testing-based, and genetics clinic-based screening programs. We performed an in-depth analysis of CRC-based LS programs, classifying them into three additional subcategories: universal, age-targeted, and selective. In five studies, universal programs based on immunohistochemistry, either alone or in combination with the BRAF test, were cost-effective compared with no screening, while in two studies age-targeted programs with a cutoff of 70 years were cost-effective when compared with age-targeted programs with lower age thresholds. CONCLUSION: Universal or <70 years-age-targeted CRC-based LS screening programs are cost-effective and should be implemented in the "real world."


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Genetic Testing/economics , Age Factors , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics , Early Detection of Cancer/economics , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics
8.
Front Public Health ; 5: 243, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28955708

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colon cancer syndrome, accounting for 3-5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, and it is associated with the development of other cancers. Early detection of individuals with LS is relevant, since they can take advantage of life-saving intensive care surveillance. The debate regarding the best screening policy, however, is far from being concluded. This prompted us to conduct a systematic review of the existing screening pathways for LS. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS online databases for the existing screening pathways for LS. The eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review required that the studies evaluated a structured and permanent screening pathway for the identification of LS carriers. The effectiveness of the pathways was analyzed in terms of LS detection rate. RESULTS: We identified five eligible studies. All the LS screening pathways started from CRC cases, of which three followed a universal screening approach. Concerning the laboratory procedures, the pathways used immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability testing. If the responses of the tests indicated a risk for LS, the genetic counseling, performed by a geneticist or a genetic counselor, was mandatory to undergo DNA genetic testing. The overall LS detection rate ranged from 0 to 5.2%. CONCLUSION: This systematic review reported different existing pathways for the identification of LS patients. Although current clinical guidelines suggest to test all the CRC cases to identify LS cases, the actual implementation of pathways for LS identification has not been realized. Large-scale screening programs for LS have the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality for CRC, but coordinated efforts in educating all key stakeholders and addressing public needs are still required.

9.
Genet Med ; 18(12): 1171-1180, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27906166

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There is considerable evidence regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of BRCA genetic testing programs, but whether they represent good use of financial resources is not clear. Therefore, we aimed to identify the main health-care programs for BRCA testing and to evaluate their cost-effectiveness. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of full economic evaluations of health-care programs involving BRCA testing. RESULTS: Nine economic evaluations were included, and four main categories of BRCA testing programs were identified: (i) population-based genetic screening of individuals without cancer, either comprehensive or targeted based on ancestry; (ii) family history (FH)-based genetic screening, i.e., testing individuals without cancer but with FH suggestive of BRCA mutation; (iii) familial mutation (FM)-based genetic screening, i.e., testing individuals without cancer but with known familial BRCA mutation; and (iv) cancer-based genetic screening, i.e., testing individuals with BRCA-related cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Currently BRCA1/2 population-based screening represents good value for the money among Ashkenazi Jews only. FH-based screening is potentially very cost-effective, although further studies that include costs of identifying high-risk women are needed. There is no evidence of cost-effectiveness for BRCA screening of all newly diagnosed cases of breast/ovarian cancers followed by cascade testing of relatives, but programs that include tools for identifying affected women at higher risk for inherited forms are promising. Cost-effectiveness is highly sensitive to the cost of BRCA1/2 testing.Genet Med 18 12, 1171-1180.


Subject(s)
BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Ovarian Neoplasms/economics , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing/economics , Humans , Jews/genetics , Mass Screening/economics , Mutation , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Risk Assessment
10.
Ig Sanita Pubbl ; 69(6): 639-56, 2013.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24548905

ABSTRACT

With cutbacks being implemented across a wide range of social and government programs throughout Europe and the rest of the world, preventive services have become more vulnerable. In this context, it is essential to properly focus the debate on public healthcare expenditure, stressing that financing preventive services is not merely a cost, but an investment in citizen well-being as well as economic stability and development. In Italy indeed all seem to agree on three priorities: i) strengthening prevention activities; ii) reorganization of hospital care; and iii) reinforcement of primary care. A plenty of data are available in Italy from some recently published authoritative reports. Given that health policies should be driven by a solid evidence base, it is important to look at the available data to understand if these priorities are justified. The Lazio Region, which is particularly under pressure since it is one of the regions with a formal regional recovery plan (Piano di Rientro), was chosen as a case-study. In the Lazio Region public health care expenditure is particularly high, but the health care expenditure for prevention activities is among the lowest of the Italian Regions. Major weakness points documented by the essential levels of care indicators included recommended vaccinations coverage, oncological screening programs, residential beds for the elderly and persons with disability and hospital care efficiency. Avoidable mortality is higher in the Lazio than in the rest of the country, as well as the prevalence of some major behavioral risk factors. Even if all data available support the choice to consider prevention activities as a priority, it is essential to increasing the value of prevention, investing money in preventive interventions of proven effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and promoting synergies with institutions outside the health care sector, implementing in a more efficient way the principle of Health in All Policies.


Subject(s)
Economic Recession , Health Expenditures , Preventive Health Services/economics , Humans , Italy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...