Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in cancer patients: An Italian multicenter survey.

INTRODUCTION: Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) include a wide range of products (herbs, vitamins, minerals, and probiotics) and medical practices, developed outside of the mainstream Western medicine. Patients with cancer are more likely to resort to CAM first or then in their disease history; the potential side effects as well as the costs of such practices are largely underestimated. PATIENTS AND METHOD: We conducted a descriptive survey in five Italian hospitals involving 468 patients with different malignancies. The survey consisted of a forty-two question questionnaire, patients were eligible if they were Italian-speaking and receiving an anticancer treatment at the time of the survey or had received an anticancer treatment no more than three years before participating in the survey. RESULTS: Of our patients, 48.9% said they use or have recently used CAM. The univariate analysis showed that female gender, high education, receiving treatment in a highly specialized institute and receiving chemotherapy are associated with CAM use; at the multivariate analysis high education (Odds Ratio, (OR): 1.96 95% Confidence Interval, CI, 1.27-3.05) and receiving treatment in a specialized cancer center (OR: 2.75 95% CI, 1.53-4.94) were confirmed as risk factors for CAM use. CONCLUSION: Roughly half of our patients receiving treatment for cancer use CAM. It is necessary that health professional explore the use of CAM with their cancer patients, educate them about potentially beneficial therapies in light of the limited available evidence of effectiveness, and work towards an integrated model of health-care provision.

Safety of long-term administration of bisphosphonates in elderly cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of the long-term treatment bone metastases with pamidronate in older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two ambulatory patients aged 70 or older were included in the study. The median age was 73 (range 70-77). Ten patients (46%) were affected by breast carcinoma, 7 (32%) by prostate carcinoma and 5 (22%) by multiple myeloma. Nine (40%) patients presented co-morbidity. All of the patients presented at least one metastatic lytic bone lesion measuring 1 cm or more in diameter; the median lesion number was 2 (range 1-4). Hormonal therapy or chemotherapy regimen, were allowed as clinically required. Patients were treated with a fixed dose of sodium pamidronate, 90 mg in 3 h infusion every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Partial response was shown in 6 (28%) patients, stable disease in 11 (50%), and progression (PD) in 5 (22%). 2 out of 5 patients with PD presented skeletal-related events (SREs) such as bone fracture. The median treatment duration was 19 months. The treatment was well tolerated; in 5 patients (23%) a GI fever was observed, in 3 patients (18%) G1 nausea, and in 3 patients (14) G1 diarrhea. Two cases (9%) of acute renal insufficiency (creatinine 1.7 and 1.6 mg/dl), and 3 cases (14%) of hypocalcemia (7.6, 7.5 and 7.8 mg/dl) were also registered. The renal dysfunction was reversible and without consequence. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that the bisphosphonates long-term administration is useful and did not cause significant side effects in elderly subjects. Low-grade pyrexia, nausea/vomiting, acute/reversible renal dysfunction and hypo-calcemia were the most frequent side effects reported. However, they were of low grade and in most cases, did not require dose modifications and/or hospitalization.

Vinorelbine and prednisone in older cancer patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. A phase II study.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a common disease in older men. Since it is hormone resistant, no treatment may improve survival. In patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, clinical benefit is an important treatment end point. STUDY DESIGN: This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a vinorelbine and prednisone combination in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. Vinorelbine was administered at the dose of 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every three weeks; prednisone was administered orally at the dose of 12 mg/day. Thirty consecutive patients, 65 years or older, with progressive (PSA increase or increase in bidimensionally measurable lesion) metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Four patients (13%) had a partial response and 14 (46%) stable disease. Time to progression for the entire group was 4.5 months (range, 2-13) and 7.5 months for the group of responders (range, 3-13). A PSA decrease >50% was registered in 36% of the patients. Pain reduction was recorded in 44.4% of the patients and stability in 14.8%. RESULTS: The treatment was well tolerated and grade 3 toxicity was found in 2 cases of anemia and 2 cases of leukopenia without fever. CONCLUSIONS: The schedule is able to control the evolution of hormone-refractory prostate cancer and to give a clinical benefit. These results provide information for further clinical trials in a large series of elderly cancer patients.