ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: To report a case of hyphema after a bleb needling revision in a PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation. CASE DESCRIPTION: An 87-year-old man suffering from bilateral open angle glaucoma was referred to our hospital with a diagnosis of unsatisfactory intraocular pressure (IOP) control in the right eye, despite the maximally tolerated medical therapy. The patient underwent PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation in his right eye. About 2 months after the surgical procedure, the IOP was raised because of bleb failure for subconjunctival scarring. A needling revision was performed at the slit lamp. During the procedure blood reflux through a PreserFlo MicroShunt device from a filtering bleb to the anterior chamber was observed, causing an IOP rise. Treatment with oral acetazolamide, topical steroid, and antibiotic resulted in the complete resolution of the hyphema in 2 weeks and a significant lowering in IOP. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported case of blood reflux to the anterior chamber through a PreserFlo MicroShunt implant after a needling procedure.
Subject(s)
Glaucoma, Open-Angle , Trabeculectomy , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Male , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/surgery , Hyphema , Intraocular Pressure , Tonometry, Ocular , Trabeculectomy/methodsABSTRACT
Purpose: To investigate the demographic and corneal factors associated with the occurrence of delayed reepithelialization (DRE) after epithelium-off crosslinking (epi-off CXL). Design:Retrospective case series. Methods:A chart review was performed to identify patients treated with epi-off CXL. DRE was defined as a corneal epithelial defect detected by fluorescein staining that persisted for more than 10 days. Slit-lamp examination, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, corneal topography, and corneal in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) were always performed preoperatively and at each follow-up visit (1, 3, 6, 12 months). A generalized estimating equation was used to assess the baseline factors associated with DRE. Results:Data from 153 eyes were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 24.9 ± 8.5 years, and 47 (30.7%) were women. The average reepithelization time was 4.7 ± 1.8 days. Six eyes (3.9%) experienced DRE. In the multivariate model, both the age of the patient (OR = 1.30; p = 0.02) and the corneal steepest meridian (OR = 0.44, p = 0.047) were associated with DRE. Baseline nerve count was also associated with DRE (0.87, p = 0.03). Male gender was associated with a slower early nerve regrowth (1-6 months) (p = 0.048), but not with the occurrence of DRE (p = 0.27). Preoperative central corneal thickness was not related to DRE (p = 0.16). DRE was not associated with keratoconus progression after epi-off CXL (p = 0.520). Conclusions:The association between DRE and age may reflect the age-related decrease in the corneal healing response. Also, low baseline corneal nerve count is associated with DRE. Gender seems to affect reinnervation measured by IVCM but not the reepithelization time. DRE does not seem to affect the efficacy of epi-off CXL.
ABSTRACT
Background: Blue blocking (BB) lenses, including spectacles and intraocular lenses, work by attenuating short-wavelength light. BB glasses are being marketed with the aim to reduce eye fatigue symptoms when using digital devices, improve sleep quality and potentially confer protection from retinal phototoxicity. BB intraocular lenses following cataract surgery may be implanted because they are thought to prevent age-related macular degeneration (AMD) progression.Methods: The present study is a systematic review aiming to analyze BB lenses clinical efficacy in preventing blue light-related ocular disorders, including AMD progression, eye fatigue, and their impact on sleep quality. We searched Medline, PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library until May 2020.Results:Although several studies have been performed investigating BB lenses, clinical efficacy for preventing or attenuating the above-mentioned ocular disorders is often theorical or based on laboratory or animal experiments. Conclusions: To date, there is a lack of consistent evidence for a larger-sclale introduction of BB lenses in the routine clinical practice.
