Simulation-guided auscultatory training before graduation is associated with better auscultatory skills in residents.

INTRODUCTION: A growing body of scientific evidence shows that simulation-guided auscultatory training can significantly improve the skills of medical students. Nevertheless, it remains to be elucidated if this training has any long-term impact on auscultatory skills. We sought to ascertain whether there were differences in heart and lung auscultation among residents who received simulation-guided auscultatory training before graduation vs. those who did not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 43 residents were included in the study; 20 of them entered into Cardiology specialty school (C) and 23 of them entered into Internal and Occupational Medicine specialty schools (M) at the University of Trieste. Based on the history of simulation-guided auscultatory training before graduation (yes = Y; no = N), four groups were formed: CY, CN, MY, and MN. Residents were evaluated in terms of their ability to recognize six heart and five lung sounds, which were reproduced in a random order with the Kyoto-Kagaku patient simulator. Associations between history of simulation training, specialty choice and auscultatory skills were evaluated with Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Auscultatory skills of residents were associated with simulation-guided training before graduation, regardless of the specialty chosen. Simulation-guided training had a higher impact on residents in Medicine. Overall, heart and lung sounds were correctly recognized in 41% of cases. Logistic regression analysis showed that simulation-guided training was associated with recognition of aortic stenosis, S2 wide split, fine crackles, and pleural rubs. Specialty choice was associated with recognition of aortic stenosis as well as aortic and mitral regurgitation. DISCUSSION: History of simulation-guided auscultatory training was associated with better auscultatory performance in residents, regardless of the medical specialty chosen. Choice of Cardiology was associated with better scores in aortic stenosis as well as aortic and mitral regurgitation. Nevertheless, overall auscultatory proficiency was quite poor, which suggests that simulation-guided training may help but is probably still too short.

Preliminary Study on Pulse Wave Changes in Patients with Inflammatory Arthropathies Treated with bDMARDs.

Background: Patients with inflammatory arthropathies exhibit an increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk as compared to the general population, which is not fully quantified by the conventional CVD risk scores. Biotechnological disease-modifying drugs (bDMARDs) have proved beneficial to reduce the overall CVD risk in these patients, although CVD remains a major cause of increased mortality. Since it has been shown that pulse wave parameters and in particular carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) are predictors of CVD risk, the aim of this study was to evaluate their changes in patients with inflammatory arthropathies before and after bDMARD therapy. Methods: Pulse wave parameters were evaluated with applanation tonometry in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), before and after two years of bDMARD therapy. Results: At baseline, cfPWV was significantly associated with age (p < 0.001) and, among pulse wave parameters, the subendocardial viability ratio was negatively associated with C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.04) and the HAQ-disability index (p = 0.03). At baseline, PsA patients showed a higher percentage of male subjects, higher CRP, and the highest cfPWV values (p = 0.048). After two years, pulse wave parameters improved in the AS and RA groups, but not in the PsA group. Conclusions: Our data confirm that pulse wave parameters are potentially reversible after bDMARD therapy, as they improved in AS and RA patients. In PsA patients, there were no changes, which may be due to the higher percentage of male subjects and higher baseline cfPWV values.