Impact of treated effluent discharges on fish communities: Evaluating the effects of pollution on fish distribution, abundance and environmental integrity.

Domestic effluent discharges change water quality and habitat conditions in urban watersheds, though less known about how these impact fish communities. This work assessed the impact of chronic wastewater pollution on biotic and abiotic factors in six urban streams in Patagonia. Stream hydrological features, water quality conditions and fish communities were analyzed during a one-year period. The oxygen saturation and water velocity showed significant differences between up- and downstream locations of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Chemical parameters revealed an eutrophication process downstream of the WWTP input, with increased biological oxygen demanding (BOD), nitrogen, ammonium, soluble reactive phosphorus, and chlorophyll a concentrations, indicating nutrient enrichment that can lead to a potential for algal growth. The study highlighted significant differences in fish abundance, density, and biomass between reaches upstream (Control) and downstream (Impacted) of the WWTP discharges, suggesting a detrimental impact on fish communities. While juveniles, females and males of the native Catfish (Hatcheria macraei) preferred pristine zones, juveniles and males of the native Perch (Percichthys spp.) displayed preferences for areas with higher nutrient levels. Exotic species like Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) (juveniles, females and males) preferred low-nutrient, high-quality habitats, while juveniles, females and males of Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) were found near the WWTP facilities. Although some previous studies have suggested that nutrient enrichment might benefit fish, our findings highlight the negative impacts on fish abundance and distribution due to WWTPs. Fish species appear to demonstrate certain degrees of tolerance to pollution, with larger individuals displaying greater tolerance. Although the pollution levels may did not result in an irreversible collapse of the system, the absence of fish in the stream with the highest pollution level would indicate an ongoing environmental deterioration. Anthropogenic activities, especially municipal effluent discharge, exacerbate environmental degradation and demand specific management actions to maintain ecosystem integrity.

Impact of Chaitén Volcano ashfall on native and exotic fish recovery, recolonization, and abundance.

The effects of volcanic disturbance on aquatic communities and their recovery are poorly studied. To fill this gap, we explored the effects on fish communities in rivers in Argentina of the 2008 eruption of Chaitén Volcano in southern Chile (42.8° lat. S). The eruption produced volcanic plumes of ash that persisted in the atmosphere for several months. Borne on westerly winds, deposits of tephra crossed the Andes Mountains, reaching the Atlantic coast (Argentina). We compared the pre- and post-eruption abundances of a native catfish Hatcheria macraei, and two introduced trout from rivers covered by the volcanic plumes (Argentina) using Before-After-Control-Impact analysis to explore fish recovery. Total suspended solids from volcanic ashfall, macroinvertebrate abundance and richness, and species ecological attributes influenced the spatial arrangement of fish in rivers. Twenty-one months after the eruption, Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, had not returned to pre-eruption abundances in the sampled rivers, and only four rivers had regained pre-eruption species composition, suggesting that disturbance is still ongoing. The abundance of introduced fishes was strongly, negatively correlated with TSS, suggesting that ashfall affected these fish probably by clogging and abrasion of the gills. Fish recolonized previously occupied habitats 4 days to 9 months after the disturbance. Hatcheria macraei was the slowest to recolonize, whereas O. mykiss were the pioneer fish in 4 rivers following the eruption and recolonized all 5 rivers where they were present prior to the eruption. In one river, the catfish and the Brown Trout, Salmo trutta, were still absent 21 months post-eruption, potentially owing to the lack of riparian cover that would have deflected the entry of ash. Rainbow Trout suffered significant declines in abundance, whereas Brown Trout and catfish generally did not, owing to their ecological attributes. Total fish abundance was negatively correlated with ash thickness, but positively related to prey availability.

Selective foraging by non-native rainbow trout on invertebrates in Patagonian streams in Argentina.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that fish predation alters ecosystem processes by top-down effects. Salmonids are described as aggressive, visually and size-selective predators. Thus, prey selection by the non-native rainbow trout was examined on a seasonal basis at two streams: Nant y Fall (NyF) and Cabeza de Vaca (CVA) at Patagonia, a region where this kind of information is lacking. RESULTS: The benthos density at NyF was higher than that at CVA, and at both streams, riffles supported higher macroinvertebrate densities than pools. The diet of trouts from both streams was dominated by aquatic macroinvertebrates, was diverse, and was varied seasonally. The individuals represented in the stomachcontents were among the largest available at the streams. Diet diversity peaked during spring at NyF and during summer at CVA, whereas at both streams, the niche width peaked during spring. Preyselectivity varied seasonally. The selected preys included both aquatic (Gasteropoda, Crustacea, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, and Odonata) and terrestrial organisms (adult dipterans, Oligochaeta, Araneae, Homoptera, Hymenoptera, Orthoptera, and Hemiptera). Some infaunal invertebrates like oligochaetes and some small Coleoptera and Diptera larvae (mainly Chironomidae) were not selected by trouts. CONCLUSIONS: Despite of the overall dominance of trichopteran species, the composition of the diet of the rainbow trout varied seasonally. This fish positively selected both aquatic and terrestrial organisms. We observed that in both streams, trouts consumed the larger individuals available in those environments.

Assessing land-use effects on water quality, in-stream habitat, riparian ecosystems and biodiversity in Patagonian northwest streams.

Changes in land-use practices have affected the integrity and quality of water resources worldwide. In Patagonia there is a strong concern about the ecological status of surface waters because these changes are rapidly occurring in the region. To test the hypothesis that greater intensity of land-use will have negative effects on water quality, stream habitat and biodiversity we assessed benthic macroinvertebrates, riparian/littoral invertebrates, fish and birds from the riparian corridor and environmental variables of 15 rivers (Patagonia) subjected to a gradient of land-use practices (non-managed native forest, managed native forest, pine plantations, pasture, urbanization). A total of 158 macroinvertebrate taxa, 105 riparian/littoral invertebrate taxa, 5 fish species, 34 bird species, and 15 aquatic plant species, were recorded considering all sites. Urban land-use produced the most significant changes in streams including physical features, conductivity, nutrients, habitat condition, riparian quality and invertebrate metrics. Pasture and managed native forest sites appeared in an intermediate situation. The highest values of fish and bird abundance and diversity were observed at disturbed sites; this might be explained by the opportunistic behavior displayed by these communities which let them take advantage of increased trophic resources in these environments. As expected, non-managed native forest sites showed the highest integrity of ecological conditions and also great biodiversity of benthic communities. Macroinvertebrate metrics that reflected good water quality were positively related to forest land cover and negatively related to urban and pasture land cover. However, by offering stream edge areas, pasture sites still supported rich communities of riparian/littoral invertebrates, increasing overall biodiversity. Macroinvertebrates were good indicators of land-use impact and water quality conditions and resulted useful tools to early alert of disturbances in streams. Fish and birds having a greater ability of dispersion and capacity to move quickly from disturbances would reflect changes at a higher scale.