Reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 with patient-collected swabs and saline gargles: A three-headed comparison on multiple molecular platforms.

With increasing demands for SARS-CoV-2 testing, as well as the shortages for testing supplies, collection devices, and trained healthcare workers (HCWs) to collect specimens, self-collection is an attractive prospect to reduce the need for HCWs and expenditure of personal protective equipment. Apart from the traditional nasopharyngeal swab used for SARS-CoV-2 detection, alternative specimens have been validated such as a combined swabs of the oropharynx and anterior nares (OP/N), or throat samples using saline gargles. Both the alternative specimen types are amenable to self-collection. Objectives. This study aimed to compare the sensitivity of HCW-collected (OP/N) swabs, self-collected OP/N swabs, and self-collected saline gargles. Among 38 individuals previously testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (or their close contacts), two self-collected specimen types (OP/N and saline gargles) were compared to HCW-collected OP/N swabs. SARS-CoV-2 testing was performed on three molecular assays: a laboratory-developed test (LDT), and two commercial assays on automated platforms: Cobas 6800 (Roche Diagnostics) and Panther (Hologic). The sensitivity of self-collected OP/N swabs was equivalent to healthcare worker (HCW)-collected OP/N swabs at 100.0 % [92.6%-100.0%] for all three molecular tests. The sensitivity of saline gargles was not significantly different than HCW-collected OP/N swabs, but varied slightly between instruments at 93.8 % [85.9%-93.8%] for the LDT, 96.8 % [88.6%-96.8%] for the Cobas assay, and 96.7 % [89.2%-96.9%] for the Panther assay. Overall, self-collection using OP/N swabs or saline gargles are reasonable alternatives to HCW-based collections for SARS-CoV-2 detection, and could facilitate broader surveillance strategies.

Family physician visits and early recognition of melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Malignant melanoma is a deadly skin cancer with a rapidly-increasing incidence, mortality and public health burden. Thin melanomas are easily treated with good prognosis, while the thicker lesions have relatively poor survival. To broaden strategies for early recognition of melanoma, we investigated the relationship between primary care service and melanoma thickness at diagnosis. METHODS: All 714 patients diagnosed with a primary malignant melanoma between January 1995 and December 1999 in Nova Scotia were included in the present study and linked to provincial physician billing databases to reveal the patients' use of family physician services prior to the diagnosis of melanoma. We examined the importance of physician use of services for tumour thickness using logistic regression while adjusting for potential confounders. Tumour thickness was dichotomized to thin and thick using 0.75 mm as a cutoff. RESULTS: Patients who regularly visited their family physician (2 to 5 times during a two-year interval prior to diagnosis) were 66% (95% CI, 31-84) less likely to be diagnosed with thick melanoma as compared to patients who consulted their family physician less or not at all. Progression to thick tumours could have been reduced by 11.70% (95% CI, -1.33-25.77) if all patients had consulted their family physician at least once a year. DISCUSSION: Increased awareness of the need for regular medical check-ups could reduce the public health burden of melanoma.