ABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Conocer la percepción de informantes clave pertenecientes a la red de Atención Primaria de Salud en Chile, respecto al proceso de gestión asistencial y el impacto del programa nacional de Garantías Explícitas en Salud (GES) sobre la entrega de ayudas técnicas a personas mayores. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Un estudio cualitativo basado en análisis de casos múltiples, en el cual se realizó entrevistas semi-estructuradas a 8 informantes clave de la red asistencial, fue desarrollado en 2015 en tres comunas de Santiago, Chile. El análisis de la información recogida se realizó mediante análisis de contenido, y se finalizó el muestreo de máxima variación al saturar la información. Se resguardaron los criterios de rigor científico y el protocolo fue aprobado por un Comité de Ética. RESULTADOS: Hay una percepción de cobertura y detección de necesidad como adecuada en pacientes bajo control, aunque desde la perspectiva de los informantes, hay desconocimiento de esta garantía en la población. La necesidad es detectada por cualquier profesional de salud, pero la indicación es exclusivamente médica, lo que genera barreras de acceso. Hay una entrega oportuna; sin embargo, no se realiza seguimiento ni se aprecia como parte de una atención integral. Se percibe que la ayuda técnica es de calidad y la articulación de la red es adecuada, aunque no hay retroalimentación a Atención Primaria de Salud. El impacto lo consideran positivo en pacientes y familiares: mejora la ejecución de actividades diarias y genera mayor autonomía y capacidad de desplazamiento. CONCLUSIONES: Existe una percepción positiva de este programa GES y su impacto en la mejoría en la calidad de vida de vida de los pacientes. Pero, la entrega de ayudas técnicas se encuentra desvinculada de una atención integral, por ende, este programa prioriza sólo la garantía de oportunidad.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the perception of key informants working in Primary Health Care in Chile, regarding the administration and impact of the national Explicit Health Guarantees (GES) program which provides technical aids to vulnerable elderly adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A qualitative study, based on multiple case analysis of semi--structured interviews with 8 key informants of the healthcare network, was conducted in 2015 in three municipalities of Santiago, Chile. The collected information was analyzed by means of content analysis, and máximum variation sampling was carried out until the data saturation point was reached. Rigorous scientific criteria were safeguarded, and the study protocol was approved by an Ethics Committee. RESULTS: Patients deemed the program's coverage and detection of needs to be adequate, although informants conveyed that the general population is largely unaware of the program. While any health professional can detect a patient's need for technical aids, only physicians can prescribe the devices, which generates access barriers. Technical aid delivery is timely; however, it is not monitored or considered to form part of a comprehensive care system. Assistive devices are perceived to be high quality, and the delivery network coordination is seen as adequate, although there is no feedback to Primary Health Care. The program's impact is considered positive among patients and family members, as it improves the performance of daily activities and generates greater autonomy and mobility. CONCLUSIONS: This GES program is positively perceived and viewed to improve patients' quality of life. However, the delivery of technical aids is disconnected from an integral care approach, and thus the program only prioritizes the guarantee of opportunity.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Primary Health Care , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Services for the Aged , National Health Programs , Perception , Quality of Health Care , Health Services Coverage , Chile , Interviews as Topic , Qualitative Research , Health Services Needs and DemandABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine profiles of urban runners based on socio-demographic, health, motivational, training characteristics and running-related beliefs and behaviours. METHODS: Mixed, exploratory, sequential study with two stages: 1) quantitative, using an online survey; and 2) qualitative, using semi-structured interviews with runners from the previous stage. Participants were recruited via: running routes commonly attended by runners, eight races, previous databases and social media networks. The survey collected information on six dimensions: (1) socio-demographic; (2) health; (3) motivations; (4) training characteristics; (5) running-related behaviour; and (6) beliefs and perceptions about health. Profiles were identified using a two-step hierarchical clustering analysis. Subsequently, 15 interviews were conducted with participating runners across each of the identified profiles. Qualitative analysis complemented the profiles characterization, explaining motivations to start and continue running, beliefs about risk factors and injury prevention, and the physical therapist's role in rehabilitation. Statistical analysis from stage one was conducted using SPSS 22 with a confidence level of 5%. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic and content analyses. RESULTS: A total of 821 surveys were analysed (46% female), mean aged 36.6±10.0 years. Cluster analysis delineated four profiles (n = 752) according to years of running experience, weekly running volume and hours of weekly training. Profiles were named "Beginner" (n = 163); "Basic" (n = 164); "Middle" (n = 160) and "Advanced" (n = 265). Profiles were statistically different according to sex, age, years of running experience, training characteristics, previous injuries and use of technological devices (p<0.05). There were identified motivations to start and continue running. Beliefs about risk factors vary among stretching, footwear, training surface and overload. Runners identified the physical therapist as a specialist, involved in the rehabilitation process and showing empathy towards the patient. The identification of these profiles allows the generation of future prospective studies and clinical trials to evaluate risk and prognostic factors targeting specific populations of runners, with the ultimate aim of reducing running-related injury.
