Diagnostic Performance and Cell Count of EBUS-TBNA Needle Gauges: A Prospective Trial.

BACKGROUND: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a well-established diagnostic procedure for evaluating hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathies and is the gold standard for lung cancer diagnosis and staging. Recent studies assessed the effectiveness of the 19-G flex needle in obtaining larger EBUS-TBNA samples, and prospective small series gave similar results in terms of diagnostic yield when testing different gauge needles. The lack of homogeneity between series and the small sample size of some prospective cohorts poses a limit to the validity of those results. This prospective controlled study compared the 19-G flex and 22-G needles in terms of diagnostic yield. An objective laboratory method was used to count cells and compare the two needles' cytologic yields. MATERIAL: A prospective controlled study was conducted on 90 patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA for the diagnosis of hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathies. The institutional ethic committee (IEO573) approved the study, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were enrolled in this study, 84.4% of whom were diagnosed with malignancy and 15.6% with non-neoplastic disease. Sensitivity for malignancy was 93.4% (CI: 87.4-97.1%) for the 19-G needle and 92.6% (CI: 86.3-96.5%) for the 22-G needle (p = 0.80). The percentage of malignant cells in the cell block was 63.9% and 61.5% for the 22-G and 19-G needles, respectively. The cell count assessed by flow cytometry was 2071 cells/µL (IQR: 600,2265) with the 22-G needle and 2761 cells/µL (IQR: 505,3250) with the 19-G needle (p = 0.79). The malignant cell count was 0.05 × 103 cells/µL with the 22-G and 0.08 × 103 cells/µL with the 19-G needle (p = 0.70). There was no difference in the presence of tissue cores in the samples, and rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) cellularity was comparable between the two needles. CONCLUSIONS: The 19-G flex EBUS-TBNA needle is comparable to the 22-G needle in terms of diagnostic yield for cyto-histological evaluation of hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathies. There is no difference between the 19-G and 22-G needle cell counts evaluated by flow cytometry.

Changes in thyroid fine needle aspiration practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a different sample preparation protocol for fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of thyroid nodules established during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: From April 2020, conventional smears during FNAC were ceased according to World Health Organization recommendations due to the increased infection risk for operators, and a new protocol using only liquid-based cytology (LBC) was adopted. FNACs performed between April and July 2020 (COVID-19 group) were retrospectively compared with those from December 2019 through March 2020 (Pre-COVID-19 group). The distribution of diagnoses based on SIAPEC-IAP categories and the concordance between cytological and histological results were compared using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: Categories based on FNAC for 90 and 82 thyroid nodules in the Pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 groups showed no significant difference in distribution (P = .081), with the following respective cases (and percentages): TIR1, 7 (8%) and 8 (10%); TIR1C, 0 (0%) and 6 (7%); TIR2, 59 (66%) and 55 (67%); TIR3A, 8 (9%) and 5 (6%); TIR3B, 1 (1%) and 2 (3%); TIR4, 5 (6%) and 1 (1%); and TIR5, 10 (12%) and 5 (7%). Among patients with potentially malignant lesions, surgery was performed for 12/16 (75%) nodules in the Pre-COVID-19 and 7/8 (88%) nodules in the COVID-19 groups, with no significant differences between cytological and histological diagnoses (P = .931). CONCLUSION: The new LBC-only protocol provided similar diagnostic accuracy in comparison with conventional smears, and can be effectively applied during a viral pandemic improving operator safety.

COVID-19 and breast fine needle aspiration cytology method: What should we change?

INTRODUCTION: Air-dried slide preparation for fine needle aspiration cytology procedures is currently considered unsafe because of the risk of infectious aerosols of coronavirus 19. This study compares the safety and accuracy of two different protocols, one with and one without air-dried slides. METHODS: Starting from 3 March 2020, we discontinued the use of air-dried slides during breast fine needle aspiration procedures. We selected cases collected during two periods: 2 months before and 2 months after 3 March. In both groups, the number of procedures was recorded together with the distribution of the diagnostic categories and the concordance between cytological and histological results on surgical specimens for lesions suggestive of malignancy, using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: Of the 100 procedures performed during the pre-COVID-19 period, 55% were negative (C2), 3% were non-diagnostic (C1) and 40% were positive (C4 or C5). Of the 75 procedures obtained during the COVID-19 period, 44% were negative (C2), 2.7% were non-diagnostic (C1) and 52% were positive (C4 or C5). Despite the use of a new protocol during the COVID-19 period, we observed concordance between cytological and histological results for lesions suggestive of malignancy. There was no statistically significant difference concerning the distribution of the diagnostic categories in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Taking into account the slightly lower number of procedures being analysed during the COVID-19 period, the introduction of a new protocol that does not include air-dried slides is safe and reliable.

EBUS-TBNA in PET-positive lymphadenopathies in treated cancer patients.

Mediastinal lymph node enlargement is common in the follow-up of patients with previously treated malignancies. The aim of this study is to assess the role of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) for cyto-histological evaluation of positron emission tomography with 18fluorodeoxyglucose (PET) positive mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes developed in patients with previous malignancies. All EBUS-TBNA cases performed from January 2012 to May 2016 were retrospective reviewed. Results of EBUS-TBNA in patients with mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathies were analysed. Non-malignant cytopathologies were confirmed with surgical procedures or clinical and radiological follow-up. Among 1780 patients, 176 were included in the analysis. 103 of these (58.5%) had a diagnosis of tumour recurrence whereas 73 (41.5%) had a different diagnosis: 63 (35.8%) had a non-neoplastic diagnosis and 8 patients (4.6%) had a different cell type malignancy. Samples were false-negative in 5 (2.8%) out of 176 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, negative predicted value and diagnostic accuracy were 95.7% (95% CI 90.2-98.6%), 100% (95% CI 94.0-100%), 92.3% (95% CI 83.2-96.7%) and 97.2% (95% CI 93.5-98.8%), respectively. EBUS-TBNA demonstrated a pathological diagnosis different from the previous tumour in a large percentage of patients, confirming its strategic role in the management of patients with previously treated malignancies.

Molecular Testing for Targeted Therapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Suitability of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration.

OBJECTIVES: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a minimally invasive procedure that has revolutionized the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. The goal of the present study was to investigate the yield and applicability of molecular testing in the specimens obtained by EBUS-TBNA from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), comparing the results with a series of patients who underwent diagnostic surgical procedures in the same institution. METHODS: The study followed 306 consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed primary lung cancer who had the EBUS-TBNA procedure. EGFR and KRAS mutations were evaluated on cytologic specimens by Sanger sequencing and Cobas real-time polymerase chain reaction, whereas ALK rearrangement was tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The results were compared with those obtained from a series of 1,000 NSCLC surgical samples routinely analyzed. RESULTS: Molecular testing was possible in 96.9% of the samples obtained by EBUS-TBNA. EGFR (exons 18-21) mutations were found in 16.9%, KRAS mutation (exons 2-3) in 31.6%, and ALK rearrangement in 3.9% of the cases. In the surgical series, the mutations' distribution were 14.8%, 29.0%, and 3.4%, respectively. There were no statistical differences between the two series. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that EBUS-TBNA can be effectively used not just for diagnosis but also for complete mutational testing.