Different profiles of acute graft pyelonephritis among kidney recipients from standard or elderly donors.

Background: Acute graft pyelonephritis (AGPN) is a relatively common complication in kidney transplants (KTs); however, the effects on allograft function, diagnostic criteria, and risk factors are not well established. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all consecutive adult KTs was performed between 01 January 2011 and 31 December 2018 (follow-up ended on 31 December 2019) to examine the association between the diagnosis of AGPN (confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) during the first post-transplantation year and graft outcomes. Results: Among the 939 consecutive KTs (≈50% with donors ≥60 years), we identified 130 MRI-confirmed AGPN episodes, with a documented association with recurrent and multidrug-resistant bacterial urinary tract infections (UTIs) (p < 0.005). Ureteral stenosis was the only risk factor associated with AGPN (OR 2.9 [95% CI, 1.6 to 5.2]). KTs with AGPN had a decreased allograft function at the first year (ΔeGFR 6 mL/min/1.73 m2 [-2-15] in non-AGPN vs. -0.2 [-6.5-8.5] in AGPN, p < 0.001), with similar and negative profiles in KTs from standard or elderly donors. However, only KTs with AGPN and a donor <60 years showed reduced death-censored graft survival (p = 0.015); most of this subgroup received anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction (40.4% vs. 17.7%), and their MRI presented either a multifocal AGPN pattern (73.9% vs. 56.7%) or abscedation (28.3% vs. 11.7%). No difference was noted in death-censored graft survival between early (<3 months post-KT) or late (3-12 months) AGPN, solitary/recurrent forms, or types of multidrug-resistant pathogens. Linear regression confirmed the independent role of multifocal pattern, abscedation, ATG induction, and donor age on the eGFR at the first year. Conclusion: AGPN, influenced by multifocal presentation, ATG induction, donor age, and abscedation, affects kidney function and significantly impacts allograft survival in KTs with donors <60 years.

Bacterial and Viral Infection and Sepsis in Kidney Transplanted Patients.

Kidney transplanted patients are a unique population with intrinsic susceptibility to viral and bacterial infections, mainly (but not exclusively) due to continuous immunosuppression. In this setting, infectious episodes remain among the most important causes of death, with different risks according to the degree of immunosuppression, time after transplantation, type of infection, and patient conditions. Prevention, early diagnosis, and appropriate therapy are the goals of infective management, taking into account that some specific characteristics of transplanted patients may cause a delay (the absence of fever or inflammatory symptoms, the negativity of serological tests commonly adopted for the general population, or the atypical anatomical presentation depending on the surgical site and graft implantation). This review considers the recent available findings of the most common viral and bacterial infection in kidney transplanted patients and explores risk factors and outcomes in septic evolution.

Recurrent IgA nephropathy after renal transplantation and steroid withdrawal.

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis; the reported recurrence rate of IgAN after renal transplantation is as high as 13%-50%. The impact of immunosuppressive therapy and steroid withdrawal on the risk of recurrence of IgAN is still under debate. We performed a retrospective single-center study, selecting 123 kidney transplants (rtx) in 120 patients, between January 1995 and December 2012, with IgAN on the native kidney. In 51 of 123 transplants, at least one post-transplantation biopsy for clinical indication was performed; in 28 of 51 transplants, IgAN recurrence (IgANr) was demonstrated. This group (G1; N = 28) was compared with a group without IgANr (G2; N = 23). In our study, clinically evident IgANr rate was 54.9% (28/51) on biopsied patients. At discharge, the use of the immunosuppressant drugs (tacrolimus, cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, mTor inhibitors) was not associated with an increased risk of IgANr (P = NS). At discharge, all patients were steroid treated. Neither the use of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, nor mTor inhibitors (mTori) at biopsy time were associated with IgANr. However, IgANr was significantly higher in patients who experienced steroid withdrawal at any post-transplantation time (OR 7.7 P = .03). The median time to recurrence after steroid withdrawal was 59 months (min 4.18, max 113.2).

Treatment protocol with pulse and oral steroids for IgA Nephropathy after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: No specific treatment for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) after kidney transplantation is currently available. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study on 29 patients with biopsy-proven de novo and recurrent IgAN after kidney transplantation, divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 16) received intravenous methylprednisolone 500 mg per day for three consecutive days at the beginning of months 1, 3 and 5, plus oral prednisone 0.5 mg/kg every other day for 6 months. The control group (n = 13, Group 2) received supportive therapies. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable for serum creatinine (sCr) and proteinuria at the time of renal biopsy, but differed significantly at the end of follow-up. sCr was 1.8 ± 0.4 mg/dl in Group 1 vs. 2.7 ± 0.9 in Group 2 (p = 0.002), and proteinuria was 0.9 g/day in Group 1 vs. 1.9 in Group 2 (p = 0.04). The composite outcome of death-censored graft loss or doubling of sCr displayed 2 events in Group 1 (12.5 % of the entire group) and 5 events in Group 2 (38.5 % of the entire group), p = 0.19, odds ratio (OR) 4.4 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.7-27.8]. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of therapeutic guidelines for de novo or recurrent IgAN after kidney transplantation, our study reports that therapy with pulse and oral steroids for 6 months is associated with an improved renal function. Nevertheless, further randomized controlled studies in larger patient cohorts are necessary to establish the gold standard treatment.

["Getting to zero infections" in hemodialysis]. / "Getting to zero infections" in emodialisi: un obiettivo raggiungibile. Ruolo della formazione del personale sanitario e dell'impiego di nuovi presidi nella prevenzione delle infezioni cvc correlate.

INTRODUCTION: We describe two measures adopted in hemodialysis outpatient population in order to reduce Central Venous Catheter (CVC) related infections. The first is a nurse staff training in the field project and the second deals with the employment of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing devices. These actions were performed after high infection rates were observed through a dedicated register. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the limited assistance dialysis center, direct observation (12/2012-02/2013) quantified the gap between the observed and expected health care behaviour. Training needs were defined and a 40 hours nurse staff training in the field was performed on two occasions. In the hospital dialysis center, we introduced alcoholic 2% chlorhexidine solution and chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing devices to the exit site (CHG-Tegaderm and BioPatch). Infections (cumulatively bacteremia/sepsis/skin exit/subcutaneous tunnel) were monitored continuously. RESULTS: Infection rates at the two locations were progressively reduced, reaching a value of zero at the limited assistance center. Nurse staff training in the field produced: two patient reports and three CVC management protocols, Italian language translation of the "The 5 moments of dialysis" WHO poster, alcoholic 2% chlorhexidine adoption to exit-site medication and improvement of environment cleaning/sanitation actions. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that continuously monitoring infection rates represents the first step for timely corrective action. The continuous updating of health personnel, codified prevention measures and an ongoing commitment to raise awareness in a routine practice, allows us to obtain the goal of "getting to zero infections". The staff training produced equal or superior results compared to the isolated use of new chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing devices.