Odds of COVID-19-associated asthma exacerbations in children higher during Omicron wave.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the association of COVID-19 variant wave with asthma exacerbations in children with asthma. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of children in the Western Pennsylvania COVID-19 Registry (WPACR). We extracted data for all children in the WPACR with asthma and compared their acute clinical presentation and outcomes during the Pre-Delta (7/1/20-6/30/21), Delta (8/1/21-12/14/21), and Omicron (12/15/21-8/30/22) waves. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses of SARS-CoV-2-associated asthma exacerbations, adjusting for characteristics that have been associated with COVID-19 outcomes in prior studies. RESULTS: Among 573 children with asthma in the WPACR during the study period, the proportion of children with COVID-19 who had an asthma exacerbation was higher during the Omicron wave than during the prior two variant waves (40.2% vs. 22.6% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.002; unadjusted OR = 2.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.39-3.22], p < 0.001). In our multivariable regression models, the odds of an asthma exacerbation were 2.8 times higher during the Omicron wave than during prior waves (adjusted OR = 2.80 [95% CI = 1.70-4.61]). Results were similar after additionally adjusting for asthma severity but were no longer significant after additionally adjusting for poor asthma control. CONCLUSION: The proportion of children with asthma experiencing an asthma exacerbation during SARS-CoV-2 infection was higher during Omicron than prior variant waves, adding to the body of evidence that COVID-19-associated respiratory symptoms vary by variant. These findings provide additional support for vaccination and prevention.

The Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Symptom Control and Lung Function in Children with Asthma.

Rationale: Little is known about the long-term impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on children with asthma. Objectives: To determine whether SARS-CoV-2 infection affects symptom control and lung function in children with asthma. Methods: Using data from clinical registries and the electronic health record, we conducted a prospective case-control study of children with asthma aged 6-21 years who had (cases) or did not have (control subjects) SARS-CoV-2 infection, comparing baseline and follow-up asthma symptom control and spirometry within an ∼18-month time frame and, for cases, within 18 months of acute coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Results: A total of 171 cases had baseline and follow-up asthma symptom data, and 114 cases had baseline and follow-up spirometry measurements. There were no significant differences in asthma symptom control (P = 0.50), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P = 0.47), forced vital capacity (P = 0.43), forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (P = 0.43), or forced expiratory flow, midexpiratory phase (P = 0.62), after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Compared with control subjects (113 with symptom data and 237 with spirometry data), there were no significant differences in follow-up asthma symptom control or lung function. A similar proportion of cases and control subjects had poorer asthma symptom control (17.5% vs. 9.7%; P = 0.07) or worse lung function (29.0% vs. 32.5%; P = 0.50) at follow-up. Patients whose asthma control worsened after COVID-19 had a shorter time to follow-up (3.5 [1.5-7.5] vs. 6.1 [3.1-9.8] mo; P = 0.007) and were more likely to have presented with an asthma exacerbation during COVID-19 (46% vs. 26%; P = 0.04) than those without worse control. Conclusions: We found no significant differences in asthma symptom control or lung function in youth with asthma up to 18 months after acute COVID-19, suggesting that COVID-19 does not affect long-term asthma severity or control in the pediatric population.

Asthma as a risk factor for hospitalization in children with COVID-19: A nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Most pediatric studies of asthma and COVID-19 to date have been ecological, which offer limited insight. We evaluated the association between asthma and COVID-19 at an individual level. METHODS: Using data from prospective clinical registries, we conducted a nested case-control study comparing three groups: children with COVID-19 and underlying asthma ("A+C" cases); children with COVID-19 without underlying disease ("C+" controls); and children with asthma without COVID-19 ("A+" controls). RESULTS: The cohort included 142 A+C cases, 1110 C+ controls, and 140 A+ controls. A+C cases were more likely than C+ controls to present with dyspnea and wheezing, to receive pharmacologic treatment including systemic steroids (all p < .01), and to be hospitalized (4.9% vs. 1.7%, p = .01). In the adjusted analysis, A+C cases were nearly 4 times more likely to be hospitalized than C+ controls (adjusted OR = 3.95 [95%CI = 1.4-10.9]); however, length of stay and respiratory support level did not differ between groups. Among A+C cases, 8.5% presented with an asthma exacerbation and another 6.3% developed acute exacerbation symptoms shortly after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. Compared to historic A+ controls, A+C cases had less severe asthma, were less likely to be on controller medications, and had better asthma symptom control (all p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, asthma was a risk factor for hospitalization in children with COVID-19, but not for worse COVID-19 outcomes. SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to be a strong trigger for pediatric asthma exacerbations. Asthma severity was not associated with higher risk of COVID-19.

A Comprehensive Clinical Description of Pediatric SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Western Pennsylvania.

Objective: We sought to characterize clinical presentation and healthcare utilization for pediatric COVID-19 in Western Pennsylvania (PA). Methods: We established and analyzed a registry of pediatric COVID-19 in Western PA that includes cases in patients <22 years of age cared for by the pediatric quaternary medical center in the area and its associated pediatric primary care network from March 11 through August 20, 2020. Results: Our cohort included 424 pediatric COVID-19 cases (mean age 12.5 years, 47.4% female); 65% reported exposure and 79% presented with symptoms. The most common initial healthcare contact was through telehealth (45%). Most cases were followed as outpatients, but twenty-two patients (4.5%) were hospitalized: 19 with acute COVID-19 disease, and three for multisystem inflammatory syndrome of children (MIS-C). Admitted patients were younger (p<0.001) and more likely to have pre-existing conditions (p<0.001). Black/Hispanic patients were 5.8 times more likely to be hospitalized than white patients (p=0.012). Five patients (1.2%) were admitted to the PICU, including all three MIS-C cases; two required BiPAP and one mechanical ventilation. All patients survived. Conclusions: We provide a comprehensive snapshot of pediatric COVID-19 disease in an area with low to moderate incidence. In this cohort, COVID-19 was generally a mild disease; however, ~5% of children were hospitalized. Pediatric patients can be critically ill with this infection, including those presenting with MIS-C.

Review of outcomes of primary liver cancers in children: our institutional experience with resection and transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Operative intervention plays an important role in the management of primary liver cancers in children. Recent improvements in diagnostic modalities, pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, and operative technique have all led to improved survival in these patients. Both hepatic resection and orthotopic liver transplantation are effective operations for pediatric liver tumors; which intervention is pursued is based on preoperative extent of disease. This is a review of our institution's experience with operative management of pediatric liver cancer over an 18-year period. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 1990 to 2007 identified patients who were ≤18 years old who underwent operative intervention for primary liver cancer. Demographics, type of operation, intraoperative details, pre- and postoperative management, as well as outcomes were recorded for all patients. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients underwent 57 operations for primary liver cancer, 30 of whom underwent resection; the remaining 27 underwent orthotopic liver transplantation. The mean age at diagnosis was 41 months. Twenty patients had stage 1 or 2 disease and 34 patients had stage 3 or 4 disease. Forty-eight (89%) patients received preoperative chemotherapy. Postoperative chemotherapy was given to 92% of patients. Mean overall and intensive care unit duration of stay were 18 and 6 days, respectively. About 45% of patients had a postoperative complication, including hepatic artery thrombosis (n = 8), line sepsis (n = 6), mild acute rejection (n = 3), biliary stricture (n = 2), pneumothorax (n = 2), incarcerated omentum (n = 1), Horner's syndrome (n = 1), and urosepsis (n = 1). Only 6 patients had a recurrence of their cancer, 5 after liver resection, 3 of whom later received a transplant. There was only 1 recurrence after liver transplantation. There was 1 perioperative mortality from cardiac arrest. Overall survival was 93%. CONCLUSION: Operative intervention plays a critical role in the management of primary liver cancer in the pediatric population. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be given if the tumor seems unresectable at diagnosis. If chemotherapy is unable to sufficiently downstage the tumor, orthotopic liver transplantation becomes the patient's best option. Our institution has had considerable experience with both resection and liver transplantation in the treatment of pediatric primary liver cancer, with good long-term outcomes.