Public Workshop Summary Report on Fiscal Year 2021 Generic Drug Regulatory Science Initiatives: Data Analysis and Model-Based Bioequivalence.

On May 4, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) hosted an online public workshop titled "FY 2020 Generic Drug Regulatory Science Initiatives Public Workshop" to provide an overview of the status of the science and research priorities and to solicit input on the development of Generic Drug User Fee Amendments fiscal year 2021 priorities. This report summarizes the podium presentations and the outcome of discussions along with innovative ways to overcome challenges and significant opportunities related to model-based approaches in bioequivalence assessment for breakout session 4 titled, "Data analysis and model-based bioequivalence (BE)." This session focused on the application of model-based approaches in the generic drug development, with a vision of accelerating regulatory decision making for abbreviated new drug application assessments. The session included both podium presentations and panel discussions with three topics of interest: (i) in vitro study evaluation methods and their clinical relevance, (ii) challenges in model-based BE, (iii) emerging expertise and tools in implementing new BE approaches.

Model-Informed Drug Development and Review for Generic Products: Summary of FDA Public Workshop.

On October 2nd and 3rd , 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) hosted a public workshop titled "Leveraging Quantitative Methods and Modeling to Modernize Generic Drug Development and Review."1 This report summarizes Session 2 of the public workshop: "Model Informed Drug Development and Review for Generic Products." The session focused on the application of quantitative methods and modeling in modernizing the generic drug development and review.

Optimal adaptive sequential designs for crossover bioequivalence studies.

In prior works, this group demonstrated the feasibility of valid adaptive sequential designs for crossover bioequivalence studies. In this paper, we extend the prior work to optimize adaptive sequential designs over a range of geometric mean test/reference ratios (GMRs) of 70-143% within each of two ranges of intra-subject coefficient of variation (10-30% and 30-55%). These designs also introduce a futility decision for stopping the study after the first stage if there is sufficiently low likelihood of meeting bioequivalence criteria if the second stage were completed, as well as an upper limit on total study size. The optimized designs exhibited substantially improved performance characteristics over our previous adaptive sequential designs. Even though the optimized designs avoided undue inflation of type I error and maintained power at ≥ 80%, their average sample sizes were similar to or less than those of conventional single stage designs.

Additional results for 'Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs'.

In 2008, this group published a paper on approaches for two-stage crossover bioequivalence (BE) studies that allowed for the reestimation of the second-stage sample size based on the variance estimated from the first-stage results. The sequential methods considered used an assumed GMR of 0.95 as part of the method for determining power and sample size. This note adds results for an assumed GMR = 0.90. Two of the methods recommended for GMR = 0.95 in the earlier paper have some unacceptable increases in Type I error rate when the GMR is changed to 0.90. If a sponsor wants to assume 0.90 for the GMR, Method D is recommended. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of an extended-regimen oral contraceptive with continuous estrogen.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the steady-state blood concentrations and potential accumulation of levonorgestrel (LNG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) administered for up to 84 days and EE alone for 7 additional days as an extended-regimen 91-day oral contraceptive (OC). STUDY DESIGN: An open-label, single-site study was conducted in 30 healthy female volunteers. Subjects received daily doses of 0.15 mg LNG/0.03 mg EE for 84 consecutive days followed by 0.03 mg EE alone for 7 days. Pharmacokinetic (PK) monitoring was conducted on Days 1, 21, 84 and 91. RESULTS: The observed plasma concentrations of LNG after 84 days and of EE after 84 and 91 days were comparable to the steady-state concentrations observed at 21 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters over the 24-h dosing period were similar at all time points measured after achieving steady-state plasma concentrations. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that an extended-regimen OC providing 84 days of LNG/EE and 7 days of EE alone has a PK profile similar to a 28-day conventional OC regimen and does not result in any additional accumulation of these hormones.

A randomized, multiple-dose parallel study to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of synthetic conjugated estrogens, A, administered as oral tablet or vaginal cream.

OBJECTIVE: A randomized, parallel-design study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetic profile of synthetic conjugated estrogens A (SCE-A) vaginal cream (0.625 mg SCE-A/g) when administered at intervals (1 g once daily for 7 d, then twice weekly) over a 27-day period as compared with the pharmacokinetic profile of 0.3 mg SCE-A tablets administered once daily orally for 27 days. METHODS: Blood samples were collected 48 hours before initial dosing for baseline levels and at multiple occasions during the study until 48 hours after final study dosing (day 29). Maximum plasma concentration, time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax), and area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours were calculated at days 1, 7, and 27; in addition, area under the curve from 0 to 48 hours was calculated at days 7 and 27, and area under the curve weekly (AUCweekly) values were calculated for both groups. For purposes of comparison, ratios of AUCweekly values for vaginal cream and oral tablets were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with an oral daily dose of 0.3 mg SCE-A, the steady-state systemic exposure from vaginal cream application was considerably less, with the cream-to-oral ratio being 0.45 for baseline-adjusted (BA) unconjugated estradiol, 0.30 for BA unconjugated estrone, and 0.04 for unconjugated equilin (AUCweekly). At steady-state, the systemic blood levels of BA unconjugated estrone, BA unconjugated estradiol and unconjugated equilin were significantly lower in women who received biweekly application of 1 gm vaginal cream compared to women who took an oral daily dose of 0.3 mg SCE-A tablet. CONCLUSIONS: After intravaginal application of SCE-A vaginal cream, absorption of estrogens was lower compared with absorption after oral administration. At steady state, the systemic exposure of equilin, estradiol, and estrone was significantly lower after twice-weekly administration of 1 g SCE-A vaginal cream compared with that achieved with an oral daily dose of a 0.3 mg SCE-A tablet.

Effects on serum hormone levels of low-dose estrogen in place of placebo during the hormone-free interval of an oral contraceptive.

BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to evaluate the effects of low-dose estrogen compared to placebo on ovarian activity during the traditional 7-day hormone-free interval (HFI) of an oral contraceptive (OC). STUDY DESIGN: Women were randomized to placebo or low-dose estrogen for 7 days during the HFI. Serum levels of estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone and inhibin B were obtained before, during and after treatment. RESULTS: Mean hormone levels remained constant or only increased slightly for the low-dose estrogen group compared to greater more sustained increases observed for the placebo group. Estradiol, FSH and inhibin B levels were substantially higher for those on placebo. Differences were most noticeable by the end of the HFI and persisted into the subsequent cycle. CONCLUSION: Subjects receiving low-dose estrogen for 7 days during the HFI demonstrated more pronounced ovarian suppression compared to placebo as evidenced by attenuation of increases in serum inhibin B, FSH and estradiol levels.

Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs.

The planning of bioequivalence (BE) studies, as for any clinical trial, requires a priori specification of an effect size for the determination of power and an assumption about the variance. The specified effect size may be overly optimistic, leading to an underpowered study. The assumed variance can be either too small or too large, leading, respectively, to studies that are underpowered or overly large. There has been much work in the clinical trials field on various types of sequential designs that include sample size reestimation after the trial is started, but these have seen only little use in BE studies. The purpose of this work was to validate at least one such method for crossover design BE studies. Specifically, we considered sample size reestimation for a two-stage trial based on the variance estimated from the first stage. We identified two methods based on Pocock's method for group sequential trials that met our requirement for at most negligible increase in type I error rate.